ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

ATC History

Old 22nd May 2020, 19:37
  #661 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Somewhere that has beer
Posts: 8
As I remember it the VOR was originally Wisley but at that time Ibsley VOR was also in use. This caused some confusion so it was changed to OCK.
The laconic atco is offline  
Old 23rd May 2020, 05:33
  #662 (permalink)  
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: River Thames & Surrey
Age: 71
Posts: 8,563
Sorry I lied!
Thinking back, I reckon Wisley/Ockham came into use with the big LTMA re-organisation of 1977. At the same time another VOR at Stapleford Tawney was introduced named Ongar; however it was found the reception on some aircraft radios made made this sound too similar to Ockham so Ongar was changed to Lambourne.
chevvron is offline  
Old 23rd May 2020, 07:02
  #663 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 11,580
According to the Piket/Bish book, the Wisley VOR was introduced on 9th December 1971 to replace the Epsom NDB (which was retained as a standby). It was renamed Ockham 20 weeks later, on 27th April 1972.

Four weeks prior to the above, on 30th March 1972, the NDB at Ongar was replaced by a VOR, which in turn was renamed Lambourne on 28th March 1974.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 23rd May 2020, 10:53
  #664 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Surrey, England
Posts: 24
I recall being told the Heathrow “EPSOM” holD was name changed to “OCKAM” to appease the numerous wealthy and politically influential residents of Epsom, who objected to having a holding stack over their manor. They were overjoyed the EPSOM stack was withdrawn, not realising that the introduced OCKAM stack in effect still put holding aircraft over them!
brianj is online now  
Old 27th May 2020, 10:45
  #665 (permalink)  
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North
Posts: 208
Didn't Les also say that if you could get a fag between them they were separated?
airac is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.