Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Relocation once Trained

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Relocation once Trained

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Mar 2009, 14:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bradford
Age: 44
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Relocation once Trained

Hi all,

Just a quick question to all experienced and current ATCO's outthere. I am considering on becoming an ATCO. I am aware that for the initial stages on training you will be based in Bournemouth. Also once you start you will either be pushed towards Aerodome or Area Control. I am originally from Yorkshire and do not have an issue with relocating to Bournemouth temporarily to complete initial training at college. However once done I wanted to move back to the Yorkshire area or even Manchester area. I am aware that Manchester Area Control is shutting in 2010 however could one work at Manchester Airport itself. I am not really keen on relocating too far as I have already been living in Warwickshire for the past 6 years and have just moved back to Yorkshire.

Also is the salary the same for Area Control and Aerodome/Radar once validated.

If any one can answer the above questions then it will be great.

I amm attending the first stage on Monday 30th in London and see what happens from there.

Thanks for any help.
Covonia is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2009, 14:46
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Got the radio on.
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't be going into this job hanging my hopes on a posting to Manchester tower, if I were you. The stark reality is that you will go wherever NATS wants you to go. The numbers required dictate that there are far more area controllers trained than aerodrome, so the strong likelihood is that you will end up at one of the two centres: Swanwick, near Southampton; or Prestwick which is just south of Glasgow. Even if you are selected to work at an airport instead of an area centre, Manchester is the most sought after posting within NATS. You could very easily end up in Aberdeen, London, Cardiff etc.

NATS say that they will take your preference into account in terms of the area/aerodrome split, but the harsh reality is that the requirements of the business take priority.

Sorry if the above seems a bit uncompromising, I'm just letting you know what the situation is before you get too far along the process. If Yorkshire/Lancashire is the only place you will be happy then NATS isn't right for you. You'd be better trying for a job at one of the local non-NATS airports like Leeds, Liverpool, Blackpool or Doncaster. Good luck with whatever route you take!

Last edited by Roadrunner Once; 27th Mar 2009 at 16:09.
Roadrunner Once is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2009, 18:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sunny Scotland
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
have to agree 100% with roadrunner

If you are not keen on relocation then you are probably applying for the wrong career. NATS , now more than ever, is less interested in its employee's needs and more in its own. sorry to sound down beat as well, but thats the truth. IF you go approach then you could end up anywhere in the country, including manchester. if you end up in area then its southampton or prestwick.
As for salary, it a contentious issue. The union democratically negotiated varying rates dependant on complexity , level of traffic and a whole range of other reasons. consequently , where you get posted affects how much you can earn. the highest paid are the area people at southampton as well as the two main london airports. then the area people at scottish and manchester then there is a sliding scale .If you need exact figures i'm sure they are available somewhere on t'internet.

best of luck! its an interesting job despite all our moaning
ayrprox is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 00:01
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bradford
Age: 44
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks

Thanks for that. What choice do you have in being on approach instead of area. How do NATS determine what you will be doing.

I know I stated before that I wanted to come back to Yorkshire region. What I meant to say was that, I would like to come to this region however I could settle for gong to London or Birmingham if not manchester. What I dont want to do is live in Swanwick or Prestwick. I know I may not have a choice, but is it possible to once you have been validated and become an ATCO to then apply to a Non-Nats airport like Leeds, Liverpool, Blackpool etc......

Is the salary really worth the job?
Covonia is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 00:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Saffron Walden, UK
Age: 46
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
However once done I wanted to move back to the Yorkshire area or even Manchester area.
When dealing with NATS these plans/aspirations will go straight out of the window I can assure you! These days they will decide where you are sent to meet their requirements and if you dont like it basically you can 'lump' it!
classicwings is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 00:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Down south and up north
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The chances are you'll be put onto Area rather than Aerodrome/Approach. If you do not want to move from your area then I'm afraid being an ATCO with NATS is probably not the route for you.
Avoiding_Action is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 00:31
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bradford
Age: 44
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats fair enough but how is it determined by NATS besides management needs if you will be on area or approach.
Covonia is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 00:35
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In a control room with no radar...
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe they choose which route you take when you start out at the College. They assess where there is a need for controllers and where they feel you will be best suited, then decided if it is Area, Oceanic, Approach only, Tower only, Approach/Tower
Scott Diamond is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 00:40
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bradford
Age: 44
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so its all just names in a hat then. I thought they determined it on skills and abilities.

Also is the pay really what they say it is?
Covonia is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 00:58
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In a control room with no radar...
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by My previous post
They assess where there is a need for controllers and where they feel you will be best suited,
...
Scott Diamond is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 01:01
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Got the radio on.
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why, what do 'they' say it is? Whatever it is, it's not enough in itself to be the only reason for entering a career like ATC. Especially if you won't be happy in somwhere like Aberdeen, Swanwick or Cardiff. Like I said before, even if you beat the odds and get streamed for aerodrome, a posting to Manchester is very unlikely. If your ambition to be an ATCO isn't strong enough for you to get past that, then you are taking the wrong career path.
Roadrunner Once is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 01:46
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Bradford
Age: 44
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok cool. i get it now. Still interested in the career though, so lets see wot happens with the assessments.

What about the pay? Is it really as high as some web sites have stated. I mean once you have become an atco in 2-3 years are you really on a minimum of about £40k a year?
Covonia is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 10:04
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: EGNT
Age: 39
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think your putting a little too much emphasis on 'money' here

Me personally, id do the job for peanuts and relocate anywhere, because it's what I want to do...
BoeingGTi is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 11:25
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<but is it possible to once you have been validated and become an ATCO to then apply to a Non-Nats airport like Leeds, Liverpool, Blackpool etc......>>

In very basic terms, if you reach that stage you will hold an Air Traffic Control Licence. However, in order to use it you must have the appropriate ratings. To work at an airfield you would need Tower and maybe Approach Radar qualifications which you may not get if NATS decide you are going to a Centre.

<<Is the salary really worth the job?>>

Are you kidding? If you are employed by NATS you will have a damned good job with excellent pay (50-80K depending on where you are posted), plenty of time off and good working conditions. Some of the youngsters out there may not agree because they don't know on which side their bread is buttered!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 11:57
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In a thriving maritime community
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the pay? Is it really as high as some web sites have stated. I mean once you have become an atco in 2-3 years are you really on a minimum of about £40k a year?
It takes 3 years from your start date with Nats to reach that sort of money (in the 45k region including shift allowances etc).
However as a trainee the pay is very low, so it is really a long term investment, especially as an area student, where it takes around 3 years.

At airports there is a chance to reach first validation fairly quickly (even less than 1 year from start of college to valid) and to increase the salary (it goes up to around 30k ish+allowances).

It's been said it's not all about money and that shouldn't be what motivates you, however who says that usually drives a very fancy car .
Also, I don't think ATCOs do AAVA's (very well paid overtime) purely for the love of Air Traffic .
Ivor_Novello is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 15:51
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seaworld
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With regards to the post by HD saying:
Some of the youngsters out there may not agree because they don't know on which side their bread is buttered
If this is meant to refer to 'youngsters' working in NATS, rest assured there are many non-youngsters in NATS who seem to think they have a hard life.
Traffic is... is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 18:33
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: swanwick carp lake
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
people who harp on about other motivation other than money. may i ask why?
If people want to do the job for money then go for it. It's very good money and you get a shedload of time off to spend it in.
If someone can do the job they will. there are enough tests from application to validation to weed out the rubbish. Once people are valid and are sitting down doing the job does it matter what their motivation is?
I work alongside people who like spotting and aviation in general, i also work alongside people who couldnt care less. Neither group is better than the other.
ImnotanERIC is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 19:27
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Traffic is..... I'm sure you are right, but it's incomprehensible to me. They need to try to find work in the real world, if there is any!!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2009, 22:30
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: N/A
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ImnotanERIC
I'm glad you said that, was sort of worried about my lack of plane spotting interest.
jack.raven is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2009, 10:17
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: On a rolling stone
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Covonia

Have you been down to the Swanwick area? It is a nice part of the country. There is a shortage of flat caps, whippets are not common pets, and the chippies don't sell gravy, but other than that it's not three bad.
HigherSights is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.