UK Heathrow
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Around
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's true, but there are also two different standards for civil ATS units within the uk. Something I've never been quite able to understand. If it's perfectly safe at Heathrow, why is it suddenly unsafe down the road at Farnborough (for example)?
Guest
Posts: n/a
True rodan, and I've got no answer for that. IIRC LL had approval to do 'land after the departing' and different 'land after' procedures, which were landing clearances when no other airport (perhaps with the exceptions of CC and KK) was permitted to do this. I don't know what the situation is now but the 'big NATS airports' were undoubtedly treated differently by the CAA when the CAA and NATS were a single organisation. What the justifications were I have no idea, no one would say when I asked.
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The UK uses Small as a wake category. Although some others may do likewise (Switzerland) it is unusual.
The UK spacings are
H-H,M,S,L
M-M/S, L
S- S,L
H-4,5,6,8NM
M-3,4,6
S-3,4
To all UK ATCOs, I believe these spacings are different from ICAO and the rest of Europe.
As for cleared to land when one aircraft is still to vacate... well, it does include a certain distance that not many regional aerodromes in the UK could accommodate. I'm out of touch but I think it says the preceeding aircraft must be 2500m further along the runway and in continuous motion? However, remember that this is used elsewhere in Europe... as is the 2.5NM on final approach within the last 10 miles.
The UK spacings are
H-H,M,S,L
M-M/S, L
S- S,L
H-4,5,6,8NM
M-3,4,6
S-3,4
To all UK ATCOs, I believe these spacings are different from ICAO and the rest of Europe.
As for cleared to land when one aircraft is still to vacate... well, it does include a certain distance that not many regional aerodromes in the UK could accommodate. I'm out of touch but I think it says the preceeding aircraft must be 2500m further along the runway and in continuous motion? However, remember that this is used elsewhere in Europe... as is the 2.5NM on final approach within the last 10 miles.
Guest
Posts: n/a
As for cleared to land when one aircraft is still to vacate... well, it does include a certain distance that not many regional aerodromes in the UK could accommodate. I'm out of touch but I think it says the preceeding aircraft must be 2500m further along the runway and in continuous motion? However, remember that this is used elsewhere in Europe... as is the 2.5NM on final approach within the last 10 miles.
BTW, on the wake vortex categories (or wake turbulence as we're now supposed to call it on the RTF), I think that even for the categories that are used by ICAO the weights used as the cut-off point in the UK are different.
More than just an ATCO
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is this "substandard" Heathrow the one refereed to in other threads as the best airfield in the world with the best Air Traffic Control?
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But the principle was that LL was in some way able to use these procedures - and again I think CC was similarly authorised - whilst other airports were not.
Anyway, isn't the difference in vortex spacing down to the increased density of the air mix due to pollution?
Guest
Posts: n/a
I would imagine that given enough time we could find procedures that other airports can use, but others can not.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree Spitoon, and on the 'land after/after the landing, cleared to land' matter I very rarely used them, purely because most crews would not understand the differences.