NATS - ATCO and the PPL
Thread Starter
NATS - ATCO and the PPL
I am sorry if this has been covered before (I am sure it has) but can somebody enlighten me when the PPL was an integrated part of the ATCO training, and why it was removed? I am sure it used to be mandatory or am I wrong here?
I would have thought the PPL would have been a really useful knowledge base to have in so many ways, and also allow the ATCO to continue to pursue interests in that direction if he/she wished and this could only be beneficial to everybody concerned.
Many thanks.
Flash.
I would have thought the PPL would have been a really useful knowledge base to have in so many ways, and also allow the ATCO to continue to pursue interests in that direction if he/she wished and this could only be beneficial to everybody concerned.
Many thanks.
Flash.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe it was phased-out, (in the UK), in the 1980s, due to monetary reasons. (See the Thatcher Government for details).
Allegedly replaced by some form of 'Outward Bound Course'.
-Students being required to build rafts, rather than fly aeroplanes.
Team-building horsesh1t.
Allegedly replaced by some form of 'Outward Bound Course'.
-Students being required to build rafts, rather than fly aeroplanes.
Team-building horsesh1t.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: bedlam
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was on Course 72..... we got 15 hours training which could be used towards a PPL. As far as I know the last course to get PPLs was 68 or 69... that would have been around 1988 or early 1989.
Probably wrong, memories on the way out due port and old age.
Probably wrong, memories on the way out due port and old age.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Near VTUU or EGPX
Age: 65
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NATS 62 course (April 1986) only got 15 hours flying along with that lovely team-building course at the very beginning.
A couple of previous courses had the full outward-bound nonsense, so I think the last PPLs must have been around 1984, somebody will come up with the answer soon I am sure.
A couple of previous courses had the full outward-bound nonsense, so I think the last PPLs must have been around 1984, somebody will come up with the answer soon I am sure.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having flown in a previous career and now working at a centre as opposed to an approach unit, although I did my 15 hours flight fam, I honestly don't think the 15 hours, or even PPL would be of that much benefit to someone who had never flown before (though it was a good 2 weeks away from college).
Flying a PA28 or C150 from a sleepy airfield is a world away from flying a modern glass cockpit aircraft from a busy commercial airport.
Having said that, at the very few airports that NATS provides a service where light aircraft circuits still happen, I think some sort of famil would be beneficial.
For larger airports and area units, more fam flights would, IMHO, be far more beneficial.
As for the 'team building' week - the company that NATS used to employ was staffed mainly by ex mil bods. The 'team building' exercises where taken straight from the military and were actually more to do with leadership than team building...the real team building happened in the bar of an evening... Easy money for the company that supplied their services, wasted money for NATS.
Flying a PA28 or C150 from a sleepy airfield is a world away from flying a modern glass cockpit aircraft from a busy commercial airport.
Having said that, at the very few airports that NATS provides a service where light aircraft circuits still happen, I think some sort of famil would be beneficial.
For larger airports and area units, more fam flights would, IMHO, be far more beneficial.
As for the 'team building' week - the company that NATS used to employ was staffed mainly by ex mil bods. The 'team building' exercises where taken straight from the military and were actually more to do with leadership than team building...the real team building happened in the bar of an evening... Easy money for the company that supplied their services, wasted money for NATS.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Fife.UK.married,2 kids
Age: 75
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anotherthing, in the days when UK ATCO Cadets got a full PPL course they also got a brief introduction to instrument flying, frasca simulator plus 2 shared cross country trips. On the cross country trips groups of 3 of us each flew one leg with an instrument approach at the end of it, I had the pleasure of a radar approach at Brum and an ILS at Ostend. We also spent time at BEA on the ROT and the Trident simulator plus fam flights. So we did get a small insight into life at the piloting sharp end.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also during the Cadetship, we received local Club membership and the 5 hours for annual currency, along with any required Club CFI acceptance and Type conversion time. Halcyon days indeed.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hyperborean and GBZ
Point taken but I still honestly believe that more fam flights are what is needed today and not bashing circuits.
Regardless of my previous career, the 15 hours wasn't really worth the time - apart from the fact that I was able to teach my 'flying instructor' how to navigate properly!!
Bashing the circuit etc is a great idea for ATCOs at airfields where circuits take place - they can easily equate their trepidation of going solo etc to that of any pilots at the 'fields local flying club and this would hopefully help them provide a better service.
I agree that more cross training/experience should happen, but that nowadays it should take the form of pilots visiting us and vice versa - done on company time.
NATS are supposed to be 'In Tune With Our Customers' as per the destinations... what better way to do so than to recognise that with the dilution of the course at the college, more effort should be made to allow us, especially those at the beginning of their career, to sit with the customers as they do their jobs.
Similarly, slight thread creep, there should be much more famil visits between airports and centres, again because the college course has been so diluted.
We want to be the best in the business - we can't do that is half the ATCOs don't appreciate the problems the other half have on a day to day basis.
Of course, getting released to do this on company time, and getting reimbursed for mileage is not entertained - very shortsighted.
Point taken but I still honestly believe that more fam flights are what is needed today and not bashing circuits.
Regardless of my previous career, the 15 hours wasn't really worth the time - apart from the fact that I was able to teach my 'flying instructor' how to navigate properly!!
Bashing the circuit etc is a great idea for ATCOs at airfields where circuits take place - they can easily equate their trepidation of going solo etc to that of any pilots at the 'fields local flying club and this would hopefully help them provide a better service.
I agree that more cross training/experience should happen, but that nowadays it should take the form of pilots visiting us and vice versa - done on company time.
NATS are supposed to be 'In Tune With Our Customers' as per the destinations... what better way to do so than to recognise that with the dilution of the course at the college, more effort should be made to allow us, especially those at the beginning of their career, to sit with the customers as they do their jobs.
Similarly, slight thread creep, there should be much more famil visits between airports and centres, again because the college course has been so diluted.
We want to be the best in the business - we can't do that is half the ATCOs don't appreciate the problems the other half have on a day to day basis.
Of course, getting released to do this on company time, and getting reimbursed for mileage is not entertained - very shortsighted.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would have thought that flying training to PPL standard is of much more relevance to the personnel who are dedicated FISOs doing London and Scottish Information at the ATC centres.
As a trainee with a PPL, i'm not sure it has helped me as much as I thought it would. Training to be an ATCO wll probably improve my flying more than I imagined possible, however.
The reason I don't think it was of much use (from an ATCO training point of view) is that i managed to obtain a PPL without ever talking to a ATC tower (always A/G or the odd FISO), without ever filing a flight plan, without receiving anything more than a FIS. So when I started training I had no cockpit experience of GMC, or even Air Control really. The only CAS I had ever been in was Solent CTA, and that was a rarity.
I've never flown in bad weather (unless you count rain showers) either. The PPL meant that I was already comfortable with broadcasting my voice, and with a lot of the basic phraseology, but I don't think that was a big problem for others anyway.
I enjoy flying immensely, don't get me wrong. I'm sure that flying training specifically targeted at ATCO familiarisation would be beneficial, I just don't think the training I did put me in any better position than my peers.
Ginger
The reason I don't think it was of much use (from an ATCO training point of view) is that i managed to obtain a PPL without ever talking to a ATC tower (always A/G or the odd FISO), without ever filing a flight plan, without receiving anything more than a FIS. So when I started training I had no cockpit experience of GMC, or even Air Control really. The only CAS I had ever been in was Solent CTA, and that was a rarity.
I've never flown in bad weather (unless you count rain showers) either. The PPL meant that I was already comfortable with broadcasting my voice, and with a lot of the basic phraseology, but I don't think that was a big problem for others anyway.
I enjoy flying immensely, don't get me wrong. I'm sure that flying training specifically targeted at ATCO familiarisation would be beneficial, I just don't think the training I did put me in any better position than my peers.
Ginger
Thread Starter
Sorry, yes I was refering to the UK... and many thanks for the replies. I knew even though my memory is rusty that the PPL used to be part of the training.
I agree however with the poster that time in a (clockwork) 152 is far from the reality of todays glass cockpits. As another poster points out, time was had on a Trident Sim in addition.
Perhaps today, the 15 hours (to Solo) coupled with a few hours on a FTD (or FFS) would be a great core intro. Cost wouldn't be prohibitive either.
Not surprised Thatcher phased out the PPL though...
Flash.
I agree however with the poster that time in a (clockwork) 152 is far from the reality of todays glass cockpits. As another poster points out, time was had on a Trident Sim in addition.
Perhaps today, the 15 hours (to Solo) coupled with a few hours on a FTD (or FFS) would be a great core intro. Cost wouldn't be prohibitive either.
Not surprised Thatcher phased out the PPL though...
Flash.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Scotland
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The last CAA (now NATS) course to get the full PPL was 57 ATCO Cadet course (in late 1983). Number 58 course (commenced in May 1984) was the first of the "new style" cadetships, which comprised training in Aerodrome, Approach, Approach Radar, Area and Area Radar ratings. The training also included an Outward Bound course and 15 hours flying in lieu of the PPL.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apt as I am to let my mind wander...... a single individual must have had the clever(?) idea of stopping PPL training for ATCOs. I wonder who that was and what benefit he saw in such an idea?
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gingerbread man
The idea of giving ATCOs some flight time wasn't to do so much with helping them through ATCO training but more to do with giving them an appreciation of what pilots do.
As stated though, I think in todays environment the money could and should be spent more efficiently with flight deck famils and visits to units that you interact with.
The idea of giving ATCOs some flight time wasn't to do so much with helping them through ATCO training but more to do with giving them an appreciation of what pilots do.
As stated though, I think in todays environment the money could and should be spent more efficiently with flight deck famils and visits to units that you interact with.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Abroad
Posts: 1,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FWIW, in France it's still the case the ATCOs receive (if they so choose, I believe) a Brevet de Base as part of their training. Coincidentally or not, an awful number of them are active PPLs.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Apt as I am to let my mind wander...... a single individual must have had the clever(?) idea of stopping PPL training for ATCOs. I wonder who that was and what benefit he saw in such an idea?