Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Separation in London City CTR at night

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Separation in London City CTR at night

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Nov 2008, 09:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Separation in London City CTR at night

How is separation managed in the City CTR at night? During the day, lots of helicopters and fixed wing do their stuff over the city VFR using visual separation with the usual excellent support of the Thames controller. But do different separation rules apply when it becomes SVFR? There's not a lot of space for 1000 ft and/or several miles horizontal.
bookworm is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2008, 12:59
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hampshire UK
Age: 70
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Bookworm,

As you state, at night only IFR and SVFR clearances can be issued in the London City CTR (Class D). Therefore standard separation of 3nm horizontally and/or 1000ft vertically must be applied. However, City Tower can apply reduced separation in the vicinity of the aerodrome when appropriate, and the Metropolitan Police and Helimed helicopters can separate themselves visually, provided that certain criteria are met.
ATCO Two is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2008, 13:13
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks ATCO Two.

So my usual detail for a daytime sightseeing flight is a VFR transit from Ally Pally to Crystal Palace and then back again. Presumably then, that's much more difficult to accommodate at night, even when City is closed on Saturday afternoon?
bookworm is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2008, 17:14
  #4 (permalink)  
BarbiesBoyfriend
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just in case any 132.7 (or LCY tower) controllers are looking at this thread, as a BA Cityflyer chap, I'd like to say Good Job.

Very effective ATC at this airport.
 
Old 8th Nov 2008, 22:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hampshire UK
Age: 70
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Bookworm,

If you arrive outside the peak traffic times, then you stand a fair chance at night on a SVFR clearance. Ally Pally to Crystal Palace on Westerlies is not a huge problem, but on Easterlies it can be much more difficult. When City is closed on saturday afternoons/evenings, you stand an even better chance, depending of course on higher priority traffic in the zone.

Hi BBF,

Thank you for your kind comments. Several Thames and City Controllers read PPRuNe, so I am sure they will appreciate your words as much as I do. Now how about some fam flights with Cityflyer?
ATCO Two is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2008, 00:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Horsham, West Sussex
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll second BBF's comments. LCY ATC and Thames do a great job and give a high quality service to all in a very stressful and busy piece of airspace. The regular postion reports on VFR traffic is very informative and helps with SA.

And credit to the rotary drivers who excercise such discipline in such an enviroment and always excercise the upmost proffesionalism in assisting ATC and the departing/arriving traffic with separation.

Supramkiv (Cityjet FO)
supramkiv is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2008, 10:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ישראל
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
anyone know the reason why rwy 28 is not a 3 degree slope?
No_Speed_Restriction is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2008, 11:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
Runway 28 needs the steep approach to clear the East London River Crossing, to the east of the runway and just where the flightpath crosses the Thames. Now this bridge has not been built yet, despite having been planned since long before LCY opened 20 years ago, and is subject to constant yes-no decisions by politicians, but the steep approach is to clear its location if/when it is built. One of the original planning conditions on the airport when first built was it should not compromise this planned bridge.

The bridge will be quite high to allow seagoing ships (still quite a few come up the Thames ths far) to get underneath. For example the sugar refinery to the immediate south of LCY has ocean-going freighters delivering raw sugar cane from the Caribbean. However unlike the bridge on the M25 at Dartford it will not have piers above the bridge deck. If you look to the north as you cross the river approaching 28 (when pax-ing only of course !) you will see some initial signs of construction of approach roads, which have laid unused for many years.
WHBM is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2008, 15:04
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ישראל
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you learn something new every day
No_Speed_Restriction is offline  
Old 11th Nov 2008, 23:40
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: down south
Age: 43
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't Boris axe the Thames Gateway Bridge last week?
Taffy1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.