Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

EGLL Dover Departures

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

EGLL Dover Departures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Nov 2008, 11:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question EGLL Dover Departures

Spent the last few days doing Dover departures out of Heathrow. Each departure was subject to Start-up delays as well as long times spent on taxiways awaiting departure.

The controller mentioned 3 minute spacing and at one point it was raised to 4 minute spacing.

What are the issues here? Why does this departure seem more prone to disruption than others.

Just curious..........


T'bug
Thunderbug is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2008, 14:09
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UAE
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MDI's sounds a likely cause. A frequently used ATFM tool to avoid a regulation and the associated NATS attributable delays. Dover sector is a narrow piece of airspace being fed by not just LL deps but GW,SS,KK,LC etc. plus traffic inbound to Brussels TMA dropping through London TMA climbers. MDI's and ADI's are not overly popular with tower controllers as it increases their (already busy) workload and as you experienced, extra time fo a/c sitting on the ground.
But as I wasn't there this is just an educated guess to aid your query
thinkofdolphins is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2008, 14:16
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From my dim and distant memory of such things Dover's on Westerlies have a standard 3 min between them due to the raking left turn after departure. There are so many interpretations of this turn that 2 minutes can sometimes put consecutive Dovers embarrasingly close together if the second one is a bit quicker and a bit tighter in the turn. The classic used to be an A340 followed by a 747. The A340 gets airborne and used to be told "no atc speed restriction" at which point they would gleefully come back to 210kts and be eaten alive by the Jumbo 2 minutes (that is a tower 2 minutes which in my experience is somewhere between 61 and 80 seconds) behind. Anything longer than 3 minutes is indeed to due flow regulation which could be due to a number of things. The most likely cause is simply too much traffic forecast in the DVR sector at the same time but it could be due to Weather or there is also an enormous danger area owned by the belgians (they use it for exercises in their attack gliders) I think which can have some severe restrictions on the use of the old greenway.
Vlad the Impaler is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2008, 20:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Thunderbug.
The word I hear round my way is that those 3/4 minute MDI's (Minimum Departure Intervals) are gonna have a bit less of the "Minimum" part applied, thanks to the encouraging forthcoming conditions about to be provided by the employer.

So I'd get used to sitting on stand a bit longer and eating biscuits!
expediteoff is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 12:25
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The classic used to be an A340 followed by a 747. The A340 gets airborne and used to be told "no atc speed restriction" at which point they would gleefully come back to 210kts and be eaten alive by the Jumbo 2 minutes
Not quite correct Vlad. The A340 would get airborne and fly at 210/220Kts as was their right (the no speed restriction is a removal of the 'not above 250kts below FL100').

It was the subsequent taking off of the speed restriction on the aircraft behind (76/74 etc) that caused the problems!

It also didn't help that the bus drivers didn't inform the ATCO of the fact they would not be climbing at 250Kts, this was remedied when controllers were quickly brought up to speed with the facts of the A340 climb characteristics (basically, crap)
anotherthing is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 13:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Somewhere on a RWY
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

Can be a lot...

If you PM or post the CALLSIGN i'll see what I can find (+ day and approx hour)
Could be restrictions into MAASTRICHT AIRSPACE or EBBU WEST(KOKSY sector)...
Let me know and I'll try to find out ...

grtz
BravoMike is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 16:03
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hants
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DVR deps from the TMA airfields funnel through a narrow piece of airspace, made worse a lot recently by CB156 French military use of airspace that infringes the airway.

Sensible tactical use of an MDI can avoid the need for a flow regulation by delaying a small number of departures, rather than giving everyone flying into the sector a CFMU slot delay. Less overall delay is a good thing, no?

Edited due to reply appearing grumpier than intended. Apologies.

Last edited by beaver liquor; 3rd Nov 2008 at 16:37.
beaver liquor is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 16:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: swanwick carp lake
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats a bit of a ****ty response to his comment. i don't see where he wrote something you might take offence to?
you are not an ojti that cries are you?
ImnotanERIC is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2008, 20:09
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the replies - although Expediteoff's response was a bit too subtle for me, but doesn't sound good....!

For info: Ops were Easterly throughout the period (don't know if that makes a different). As for MDIs being better than slots - Not sure. It was 53 mins from calling ready to getting airborne. At least with a slot there is a chance of an improvement.

T'Bug
Thunderbug is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2008, 08:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thunderbug

...response was a bit too subtle for me, but doesn't sound good....!
We are currently fighting the big possibility of a major change in our pension benefits - and there are also rumours that the management want a pay freeze for Jan 2009 - Jan 2010 as well...
anotherthing is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2008, 09:39
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Farnham, UK
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anotherthing

Yep I was right - It doesn't sound good.......
Thunderbug is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.