Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Are We All Providing Same Standard Of ATC Worldwide ???

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Are We All Providing Same Standard Of ATC Worldwide ???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Sep 2008, 17:49
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Silicon Hills
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you really believe that "enemy" is waiting to hear combat formation on frequency?
Not at all. That's certainly not the only way to gather useful information either.


ATCO: TOMCAT 01, Good morning,ACC radar, Set squawk 3421
PIC: TOMCAT 01 squawk 4321
ATCO: TOMCAT 01 negative,squawk 3421
PIC: TOMCAT01 squawk 3421 coming down
ATCO: Identified, turn left heading 320 ,vectoring for separation
PIC: TOMCAT 01 turning left heading 320, could you give us QNH
ATCO: TOMCAT 01,QNH is 1013
PIC: TOMCAT 01 QNH is 1013
ATCO: Correct,now clear of traffic,radar vectoring for separation is terminated,position 10 Nm north east of VOR ,own navigation direct to OBJECT!
10 years of foreign habits and phraseology to un-learn. (Sigh) You would be a project.

Solid air force background plus 10+ years of experience as civil ATCOs at different places ,different countries, during difficult times
(yawn) You'd be pretty low on the senority list at my facility. MY EOD date is 1979.

Paranoid Yanks,

Why don't you stop invading countries, then there might not be a security issue.

How can an ATCO that has passed security checks in a country that happens to support your country in the wars it faces, still not have the right to work in the USA?
Well, I didn't intend to debate the neocons' fantasy of installing a peaceful Starbucks franchise in hundreds of foreign villages. But you might consider that those same neocons are presently in charge of deciding who's a security risk, and who's not.

In any event, disregarding our obvious difference of professional opinion about security, it seems a moot point. Anyone with that much distaste for the U.S. Govt would obviously never be a good fit as an employee of same. And it wouldn't take a Major Burns to figure that out.

"Cheers".
vector4fun is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2008, 20:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Here and There
Age: 46
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mr Vector,

Maybe the wrong day to discuss this however what does a belief in a government have to do with controlling airplanes? Governments come and go, policies change, but at the end of the day we do the same job. I could not care a less where a military aircraft is going, he has a job to do and that is that.
I don't know how much you know out side quite an insular country but terrorism is not new and most of us have lived with it all our lives. If we let it control us, then they will win.

God bless, we will remember September 11th.
Use the Force is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2008, 21:23
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Silicon Hills
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Force,

I understand your point, and while I have only had the pleasure of visiting Europe once for two weeks, and Mexico once or twice too often, your point is well taken. All I'm trying to point out is that most U.S. Controllers are Federal Government employees, and some of us work quite closely with our military units over here. In fact, the U.S. military seems to slowly be getting out of the ATC business, and turning it over to civilian DOD and FAA controllers. As such, the Federal Govt is, for better or worse, very picky about who they hire, or even let visit our facilities nowadays. Paranoid is probably not too strong of a word. I just don't see that changing soon in our present political environment, that's all.

As I said in my original post, Personally, it would be very interesting to work with some folks with different backrounds.

Thanks for your sentiments.
vector4fun is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2008, 11:13
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: You live where
Posts: 700
Received 64 Likes on 38 Posts
ATCO94 asked
Are We All Providing Same Standard Of ATC Worldwide ???
Well, I volunteer to travel the world to investigate this although it may take a while. Just need someone to fund this investigation... ICAO, IATA, Boeing, Airbus, NASA, UN, any takers!!
missy is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2008, 07:50
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Scotland
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm rather happy that Terry Taleban from Terrorstan can't get a job on the adjacent sector. Long may it remain that way.
Dee Mac is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2008, 14:43
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Australia
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone with that much distaste for the U.S. Govt would obviously never be a good fit as an employee of same.
So no avid Democrat voters or conscientious objectors currently employed by the U.S. govt.
5miles is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2008, 13:50
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: malaysia
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HJ- sunrise to sunset

Hi all..can someone clarify how did HJ came about? Is it a code derived from a foreign language?thnxs for replies
veloo maniam is offline  
Old 14th Sep 2008, 15:37
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Maasmechelen, Belgium
Age: 51
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ veloo maniam

Like various other aviation words/abbreviations: French!

HJ : horaire de jour
HN : horaire de nuit
Moira is offline  
Old 15th Sep 2008, 14:29
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: malaysia
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HJ

Hello Moira..many thnxs.
veloo maniam is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2008, 15:15
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Itinerant
Posts: 828
Received 77 Likes on 13 Posts
ATC Standards

Though the comments and subterranean political issues are interesting, I would find it interesting if this thread could creep back to discussing the original question – though I do wish I could’ve joined Verc in his short recess from the Sand Box.

So, in terms of providing the same standard worldwide, my comment is, “Not even close.” Of course there are observable differences twixt each controller, and sometimes what appear to be significant differences in standards between otherwise similar ATC units, even in countries or jurisdictions with “mature” aviation systems, philosophies and infrastructure.

Having said that, the pressing issue in terms of worldwide ATC is levels of safety in certain geographic areas. The situation is entirely comparable to that of aircrew and air operator safety levels in those same areas. I.E. In those parts of the world where the resources and the culture (meaning corporate and regulatory cultures) are weak or non-existent, the situation is dire. In fact in those places where the problems associated with luck of funds, corruption, training, equipment, etc exist, they are usually worse in terms of ATC than flight ops. Why? ATC expertise in the regulatory realm is less available; ATC audits and auditors are far fewer; and ATC is most often a lesser priority than air carriers and pilots, regardless of resources.

As someone who has been involved in ATC on four continents I can tell you the levels of ATC provided at each end of the scale are as far apart as Venice Beach and Jeddah.

Grizz
grizzled is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.