Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

ATC separation over LHR

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

ATC separation over LHR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th September 2008 | 10:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
ATC separation over LHR

Can anyone tell me whats the lateral separation over LHR in the terminal area, on finals (wake separation) and in the airways above. Many thanks
Fatfish is offline  
Reply
Old 4th September 2008 | 11:10
  #2 (permalink)  

Spink Pots
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Up in the air
In the heart of the TMA we are allowed to use 3nm lateral separation whereas on some of the outer edges of the TMA and in the upper air, 5nm is required due to the conditions of being allowed to use 3nm not being met.

I'm not 100% sure about final approach spacing. I know they can go down to 2.5nm. I'll let an approach controller answer that one.

Last edited by Scuzi; 4th September 2008 at 12:40.
Scuzi is offline  
Reply
Old 5th September 2008 | 06:27
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Scuzi, you are right 5nm and 3nm miles depending on where you are in the London TMA and which radar source is being used.
2.5 miles can be used on base leg and final, when conditions support it. Strong winds = lower ground speed = lower landing rate. Provided the weather is suitable, the tower and radar controllers agree, 2.5 miles spacing can be used, between permitted aircraft types, where wake vortex is deemed not to be an issue. By reducing spacing to 2.5 miles, particularly in strong winds, we are able to sustain the landing rate.
Wake vortex spacing itself is another issue. Generally, we adopt the ICAO standard recommended spacing, with one or two differences. CAA are currently reviewing UK policy with regard to spacings, A380 concerns constantly change!
Fatfish, why do you ask the question, have you had issues?
2.5
2.5 miles is offline  
Reply
Old 5th September 2008 | 11:41
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
Thanks guys. No issues, just wondering what the seperation was. How about Airways above. Is it 20 miles? Thanks again
Fatfish is offline  
Reply
Old 5th September 2008 | 12:06
  #5 (permalink)  

Spink Pots
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Up in the air
It's 5 miles in the airways above too.
Scuzi is offline  
Reply
Old 5th September 2008 | 12:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
From: Hants
Fatfish -

It's totally a radar environment, hence the 5 miles in the airways above. Nothing 'procedural' about it
anotherthing is offline  
Reply
Old 12th September 2008 | 14:42
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
Ok, 5 miles under radar seperation but is there a minimum lateral distance usually used for aircraft on the same airway transiting the LON FIR? 5 miles seems close. Thanks
Fatfish is offline  
Reply
Old 12th September 2008 | 15:00
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
From: Hants
5 miles above FL245

3 miles below this within the lateral and vertical confines of the London Terminal Control Area
anotherthing is offline  
Reply
Old 13th September 2008 | 10:19
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: London Under EGLL(LHR) 27R ILS
During LVP's, Final approach spacing should be increased to 6 miles and aircraft should establish on the ILS outside 10nm from touchdown.

A380 Operations
Medium aircraft behind an A380-800 aircraft: 3 minutes
Small aircraft behind an A380-800 aircraft: 3 minutes
Light aircraft behind an A380-800 aircraft: 4 minutes
Heavy Medium Small Light
Heavy4 miles 5 miles 6 miles 8 miles
Medium.......... 3 miles 4 miles 6 miles
Small..........
3 miles 3 miles 4 miles
Light No Wake Vortex Spacing Necessary

If Conditions permit, minimum spacing is 2.5NM rougthly a 747 behind and A321 or a 737 behind an A319..

***** = No vortex wake spacing applicable
Regards,


R...
HeathrowAirport is offline  
Reply
Old 17th September 2008 | 07:15
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
Many Thanks! to all your answers.
Fatfish is offline  
Reply
Old 17th September 2008 | 08:51
  #11 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 33
From: LHR/EGLL
HA, you need to be careful, you're mixing up spacing in LVPs, with separation which are completely different. Also, the A380 separations you mention are for departing aircraft, but the other separations are for arriving aircraft.
Gonzo is offline  
Reply
Old 17th September 2008 | 22:29
  #12 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: London Under EGLL(LHR) 27R ILS
So i did..

Oh Crud!

The arrivals something like reduced by 2 miles and for lights it stays the same. Can't remember. You know this though don't you :P

Yeah i Included Low Vis Procedures, as he may want to know that. I should rewrite that to make it make sense.

Regards,

..
HeathrowAirport is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.