Non Standard Flight Level
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Non Standard Flight Level
I was cruising across a Terminal Control Area at Flt Level 340 (RVSM) on a NW track and was on direct routing to a point with the radar controller's approval. After a while I was advised by the radar controller to descend to FL 330. I complied and reported "Maintaining FL330 'Non Standard' ". To this the Controller responded "There are no non standard levels in TMA".
Im not clear about this since I was routing via the TMA and was at an RVSM Cruising Level and Yes - under Radar Control. What am I missing here?
Regards,
JG
Im not clear about this since I was routing via the TMA and was at an RVSM Cruising Level and Yes - under Radar Control. What am I missing here?
Regards,
JG
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jim,
It would depend on where you were flying. It is not a phrase I have heard being used but we use non-standard levels for separation purposes if the traffic requires us to do so. It also depends on the flow of traffic, for example transatlantic traffic has a Westerly flow during the day and Easterly flow at night. This results in all levels being used for the majority of the flow. Hope this is of some use.
Regards
It would depend on where you were flying. It is not a phrase I have heard being used but we use non-standard levels for separation purposes if the traffic requires us to do so. It also depends on the flow of traffic, for example transatlantic traffic has a Westerly flow during the day and Easterly flow at night. This results in all levels being used for the majority of the flow. Hope this is of some use.
Regards
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any clue as to where this occurred ??
It might provide more information to answer your query, taking in to account local specifics.
In the UK for example, there are no TMAs above FL245.
It might provide more information to answer your query, taking in to account local specifics.
In the UK for example, there are no TMAs above FL245.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: PD
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How can you know which is the standard and non standard cruise level allocation of the airspace you're flying through???
I mean... in Italy we use a north/south system instead of the common one (east/west bound).
I can say that quadrantal level system are used only for cruise. During climb/descend phases (expecially in terminal area, approaching or leaving the airport) any level, if available, is good to be assigned!
Anyway, in Italy no TMAs above FL195 where all airspace is classified C.
I mean... in Italy we use a north/south system instead of the common one (east/west bound).
I can say that quadrantal level system are used only for cruise. During climb/descend phases (expecially in terminal area, approaching or leaving the airport) any level, if available, is good to be assigned!
Anyway, in Italy no TMAs above FL195 where all airspace is classified C.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jim,
What were you hoping to achieve by appending "non standard" to your readback?
Were you perhaps trying to suggest that the controller had made an error? If so, you should have been more specific, or at least asked for confirmation.
Besides, FL330 is not a 'non-standard' flight level FL333 might be, but not FL330.
Possibly you think that evens for west and odds for east must be adhered to at all times? The semi-circular rule is only for the planning of cruising levels.
We had this sort of issue when we moved to RVSM. I remember the consternation shown by some pilots when they were allocated FL300 in the early months. A few just didn't seem to get it.
VL
What were you hoping to achieve by appending "non standard" to your readback?
Were you perhaps trying to suggest that the controller had made an error? If so, you should have been more specific, or at least asked for confirmation.
Besides, FL330 is not a 'non-standard' flight level FL333 might be, but not FL330.
Possibly you think that evens for west and odds for east must be adhered to at all times? The semi-circular rule is only for the planning of cruising levels.
We had this sort of issue when we moved to RVSM. I remember the consternation shown by some pilots when they were allocated FL300 in the early months. A few just didn't seem to get it.
VL
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Scotland mainly, rather than at home.
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What were you hoping to achieve by appending "non standard" to your readback?
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it all depends on where you are flying, the radar positions I work are generally all one way sectors so I never give a thought to issueing a correct directional level, I just give the highest or lowest available, but then most of the traffic I work is either climbing out or descending into airfields. Also, on the Dover sector at Swanwick, Maastrict accept a/c at all levels between FL250 and FL290 24/7, as long as those issued westbound levels are requesting a higher cruise FL than the one planned for transfer. Likewise on the Hurn sectors, to aid separation just south of the boundary in Brest's airspace, those exiting on a westbound track are allocated eastbound levels and the eastbound tracks coming into our airspace come at westbound levels. I think its something to do with safety 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The frequency jungle
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe the controller wanted to point out to you that you are in controlled airspace and that there every level is a standard level. You will often find that you might fly a considerable distance accross Europe at a level which does not conform to the semi circular rule. Not at night either, but in the day with traffic all around.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: PD
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Happens very often that Vienna make us approval request to leave westbound traffic (southbound for us) at even level (standard for them, not for us).
Very often this is a very good thing for us because travelling non standard on even levels... you automatically avoid all southbound traffc coming at odd levels from Munich Area.
The distance between the incriminated airway and Munich area is about 2/3 minutes of flight. You can understand that is better let you fly at non standard level... that making separation by 2 minutes from the Closest Point of Approach!! ;P
Approaching my boundary I'll kindly request you if you prefer climbing or descending by 1000ft due to your direction of flight...!
But I mean... when I say "identified"... who cares of everything else? You're under radar control!
OT: (same thing when pilots call "approaching level": I KNOW IT! YOU'RE UNDER RADAR CONTROL! IT MEANS THAT I READ IT ON MY RADAR TOO!!!)
Very often this is a very good thing for us because travelling non standard on even levels... you automatically avoid all southbound traffc coming at odd levels from Munich Area.
The distance between the incriminated airway and Munich area is about 2/3 minutes of flight. You can understand that is better let you fly at non standard level... that making separation by 2 minutes from the Closest Point of Approach!! ;P
Approaching my boundary I'll kindly request you if you prefer climbing or descending by 1000ft due to your direction of flight...!
But I mean... when I say "identified"... who cares of everything else? You're under radar control!
OT: (same thing when pilots call "approaching level": I KNOW IT! YOU'RE UNDER RADAR CONTROL! IT MEANS THAT I READ IT ON MY RADAR TOO!!!)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank You Bataleur39 and PDCTA. On the Jeppesen Enroute Chart, I could find Mumbai TMA limits of FL70 upto 50nm and FL150 upto 100nm.
Mumbai has a large flow of traffic overhead and very often the Area Controller sounds like the Approach Controller. It was probably one of those times.
I guess the bottom line is 'Being Under Radar Control', which allows a lot more freedom in terms of Altitudes to be maintained and, Direct Routeing (which when bestowed is much appreciated).
Warm regards,
Jim
Mumbai has a large flow of traffic overhead and very often the Area Controller sounds like the Approach Controller. It was probably one of those times.
I guess the bottom line is 'Being Under Radar Control', which allows a lot more freedom in terms of Altitudes to be maintained and, Direct Routeing (which when bestowed is much appreciated).
Warm regards,
Jim
