Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Ryanair to be given "preferential treatment" by SNN ATC

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Ryanair to be given "preferential treatment" by SNN ATC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Mar 2008, 10:23
  #21 (permalink)  
DFC
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It seems that some posters are missing the point of the debate. It's about preferential treatment
I do not think that requesting that ATC provide what is the industry best practice in terms of service (the timing of passing clearances etc to avoid unnecessary distractions during flight time) is in any way requesting preferential treatment.

It is simply asking ATC to do something that will enhance safety.

If it is accepted as best practice then the question is not about preferential treatment it is about why it a) in the absence of any good reason for not using that practice it had to be requested and b) why other operators at the same location had not recognised the same issue and made similar requests.

There was nothing stopping the ATC provider taking the proposal on board and on seeing the safety benifits providing the same service to all flights.

Requesting preferential teatment is like asking that when two aircraft are ready to push / taxi at the same time that airline A will always get to go first or when two airline flights are inbound with the same arrival time that airline A will be put first. That is getting preferential treatment not asking for something to enhance safety while at the same time having only a good effect (increased safety for all) on other flights.

If I se something that can be improved and make a report with a suggested improvement am I requesting preferential treatment?

--------------

As for preferential treatment - airlines have contracts with the airports regarding services. It is up to the airline and the airport to hammer out the contract and all the terms therein. Just because one airline manages to negotiate a better deal that the next one is not a reason for crying preferential treatment. It may be a reson for asking why the other airline's team could not obtain the same or even a better deal?

If you pay £50 per month for your internet connection and I manage to negotiate the exact same connection for £5 am I getting preferential treatment or am I simply reaping the benifits of negotiating a better deal than you managed?

Regards,

DFC
DFC is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2008, 17:35
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: way down south
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As for preferential treatment - airlines have contracts with the airports regarding services. It is up to the airline and the airport to hammer out the contract and all the terms therein. Just because one airline manages to negotiate a better deal that the next one is not a reason for crying preferential treatment.
However in this case the alleged preferential treatment is from the ATC provider (IAA), not the airport authority. ATC services are a monopoly, there is no alternative provider. Airport services are not, there are other aerodromes. Monopoly service providers must play fair and equitably.
Robot1 is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2008, 18:18
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Requesting preferential teatment is like asking that when two aircraft are ready to push / taxi at the same time that airline A will always get to go first or when two airline flights are inbound with the same arrival time that airline A will be put first. That is getting preferential treatment not asking for something to enhance safety while at the same time having only a good effect (increased safety for all) on other flights.
Taking point one first....surely it depends on just where on the airfield they are.......
eg...Stand 17 at Manchester and Stand14 at Manch
S17 asks for push and start 10 secs before S14 does the same. S18 and S16 are waiting push....but 14 is clear. No preference but sensible ATC
Point 2.
When I worked at Brum we had an inbound from the North who wanted Rwy15 and one from the South who wanted Rwy 33. Theone from the North was too high too fast. He was told to either take up the hold or continue down wind for Rwy33. He elected the latter but still complained. Where preferential treatmen does occur is when the landing rwy is [say] westerly and Airline Q comes in from the west and is given an approach to the easterly rwy to the detriment of other a/f users
watpiktch
chiglet is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2008, 10:16
  #24 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Radar...

You don't actually suggest filing SNN-LPL @ 270 i.s.o. 290???

Oh my God, you rebellious free-thinkers - with people like you on the loose , what will the world come to???
But that would be filing a correct directional level ... which wasn't my point.

Specifically I was getting at the fact that rIAAnair frequently file Westbound cruising levels for flights from Dublin to Scandinavia. They are heading East, so why do that ?? All it results in is more workload for ATC to correct their basic error ... time after time after time.
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Old 9th Mar 2008, 12:38
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
time after time.
Nice song that...
watpiktch
chiglet is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2008, 16:53
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In controlled airspace
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryanair's preferential treatment

This Daniel McConnell is a typical example of a second rate lazy journalist. If he ever made an effort to research his subject properly he would realise that departures are given their ATC clearances when they call for start-up or before in a lot of cases. Departure clearances are given before line-up because the last thing a tower controller wants is a pilot discussing a clearance while sitting on the runway with another aircraft bearing down on them. The idea is that all this is done before the departure gets near the runway so they can line-up and go with minimum delay.
Apologies to all professional aviators for this Ladybird type explanition. It is intended for Mr. McConnell's level of understanding.
radar head is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.