36 year old limit for ATC/NATS trainee - what law?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Age: 55
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
36 year old limit for ATC/NATS trainee - what law?
I see that NATS continue their policy of discrimination against anyone older than 36 years old applying to be an ATC trainee. In a nutshell, you cannot.
Does anyone know what legislation rules that this is perfectly acceptable in these days of equal opportunities? They must have some legal outage or way around the basic rights to apply for any job regardless of age.
Does anyone know what legislation rules that this is perfectly acceptable in these days of equal opportunities? They must have some legal outage or way around the basic rights to apply for any job regardless of age.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Uh-oh.
There was a big thread a while ago on this topic.
(Hi there Slip and Turn!
)
Essentially, there are caveats to the relatively new age discrimination legislation where, if you can prove that having an age limit is sensible, then that is not illegal.
Ok, I've just done a quick search (search is your friend, after all.....)
Here it is....Question about Ageism...
There was a big thread a while ago on this topic.
(Hi there Slip and Turn!
)Essentially, there are caveats to the relatively new age discrimination legislation where, if you can prove that having an age limit is sensible, then that is not illegal.
Ok, I've just done a quick search (search is your friend, after all.....)
Here it is....Question about Ageism...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Age: 55
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the thread link - I was interested in the actual legal basis for refusing applications.
It was/is a bugger for me. At 31 I wanted to apply and 30 was the limit for age. Now in my ancient old age of not quite being 40 again I am rejected. Having shadowed some ATCO's it seemed a great progression from a previous job that was radio control work as well (not cabs(!) but armed police incidents etc )
Thanks Gonzo for being so kind on the search... I did try honest guv to find it as virtually everything has been discussed here somewhere. We even got a mention in Esquire magazine recently "Pprune contributors say that..." honoured!
It was/is a bugger for me. At 31 I wanted to apply and 30 was the limit for age. Now in my ancient old age of not quite being 40 again I am rejected. Having shadowed some ATCO's it seemed a great progression from a previous job that was radio control work as well (not cabs(!) but armed police incidents etc )
Thanks Gonzo for being so kind on the search... I did try honest guv to find it as virtually everything has been discussed here somewhere. We even got a mention in Esquire magazine recently "Pprune contributors say that..." honoured!
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I did try honest guv to find it
Sorry to hear the timing hasn't been great for you.
If you can demonstrate 'prior experience' of some sort, the age rule might be waived (had to word that carefully 'cos it's up to HR and we all know how good they are at deciding if you qualify).
eg If you're an ex professional pilot over 36, that SHOULD be sufficient grounds.
eg If you're an ex professional pilot over 36, that SHOULD be sufficient grounds.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: isz
Age: 51
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No way would I at my ripe age of 35 want to go through the entire college course again....I think NATS are right here (for a change) in keeping the age limit....its hard work....glad I went through at 19!!!
It costs NATS alot of money to train people...I'm sure many people over 35 wouldn't make it through!!! Sorry to be blunt!!
It costs NATS alot of money to train people...I'm sure many people over 35 wouldn't make it through!!! Sorry to be blunt!!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ice Station Zebra
Age: 57
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AMT - be careful who you're calling old.....
I went through the college aged 33 and the bit I found hardest was having to learn the written tests parrot fashion as I was so out of practice at having to learn reams and reams of information. Those who were mere youngsters and fresh out of uni found the writtens a doddle as they were practiced at it.
On the other hand I passed and a lot of those who were experts at the written failed...
At the time I applied the upper limit was under 27 but you could apply for exemption if you could demonstrate "prior experience". Contact HR and you never know, they may waive the requirements.
I went through the college aged 33 and the bit I found hardest was having to learn the written tests parrot fashion as I was so out of practice at having to learn reams and reams of information. Those who were mere youngsters and fresh out of uni found the writtens a doddle as they were practiced at it.
On the other hand I passed and a lot of those who were experts at the written failed...
At the time I applied the upper limit was under 27 but you could apply for exemption if you could demonstrate "prior experience". Contact HR and you never know, they may waive the requirements.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: isz
Age: 51
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ODI....my comment was written to wind you old geezers up...you know it was!!!
No...I admire any old timer like ODI making a big career change in their mid-30's....just saying that the job itself is great and well worth the effort...but the work at the college revising things parrott fashion is really hard....
I'm glad someone like ODI did make the decision to join....he's one of the old band who can be wound up with great pleasure!!!
No...I admire any old timer like ODI making a big career change in their mid-30's....just saying that the job itself is great and well worth the effort...but the work at the college revising things parrott fashion is really hard....
I'm glad someone like ODI did make the decision to join....he's one of the old band who can be wound up with great pleasure!!!
Chief Bottle Washer
Age Discrimination: fighting the CAA over on Rotorheads: may be worth a read for you chaps?
Ian Evans, a fellow PPRuNer, has taken the CAA to court over the 60 year old limit for commercial pilots, and raised some funds via Rotorheads. The case starts on Monday 3rd March in the London Law Courts. Any assistance would be well worthwhile, even if just as a spectator showing support from the public gallery
Ian Evans, a fellow PPRuNer, has taken the CAA to court over the 60 year old limit for commercial pilots, and raised some funds via Rotorheads. The case starts on Monday 3rd March in the London Law Courts. Any assistance would be well worthwhile, even if just as a spectator showing support from the public gallery
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Senior Pilot
I agree wholeheartedly with the campaign to scrap the age 60 rule however, this "age 36" rule being discussed here is different in that it is not a CAA imposed "law" but a company (NATS) imposed limit on its own trainees (employees).
Andy Rylance
as others have suggested, try NATS HR for an exemption - you have nothing to lose in doing so
DD
I agree wholeheartedly with the campaign to scrap the age 60 rule however, this "age 36" rule being discussed here is different in that it is not a CAA imposed "law" but a company (NATS) imposed limit on its own trainees (employees).
Andy Rylance
as others have suggested, try NATS HR for an exemption - you have nothing to lose in doing so
DD
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Andy.. Two points. First, with very great respect your past experience as a police radio operator will be of almost nil benefit to you as an ATCO, except you would know how to push a switch and talk - and talking on the radio is but one part of the job; there is far, far more involved. Air Traffic Control is a very complex job requiring years of training and to compare with with police radio work is, frankly, ludicrous.
Second point - about age. The older one gets the more difficult it is to do the ATC job, unless you have grown up with it. Someone who has had experience may - just MAY - be able to validate at another unit when they are in their late 30s/early 40s.... but to start ATC from scratch at that age is chancing one's arm. NATS, very sensibly IMHO, must take this into account. The chances of a 40-year old starting ATC from scratch and successfully validating must be much lower than for a 20-year old.
Second point - about age. The older one gets the more difficult it is to do the ATC job, unless you have grown up with it. Someone who has had experience may - just MAY - be able to validate at another unit when they are in their late 30s/early 40s.... but to start ATC from scratch at that age is chancing one's arm. NATS, very sensibly IMHO, must take this into account. The chances of a 40-year old starting ATC from scratch and successfully validating must be much lower than for a 20-year old.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my head
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Guilty conscience, Gonzo? .... Moi? 
Not me this time, old sport - didn't touch the keys - new thread, new agonist
Maybe Andy's just another protagonist in the same story? Or if you have it your way, he's another antagonist ... there's more than one of both about.
I note that false protagonists can expect dramatic devices
Quite right too, if you ask me
Not me this time, old sport - didn't touch the keys - new thread, new agonist
Maybe Andy's just another protagonist in the same story? Or if you have it your way, he's another antagonist ... there's more than one of both about.
I note that false protagonists can expect dramatic devices
Quite right too, if you ask me
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Uxbridge
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well last year when I was going through the process of leaving the RAF after 6 years as an Area Controller and 11 years as an Air Traffic assistant (i am 34), I contacted NATS to find out where I stood. Now I am not blowing my trumpet but I was a Standards and Training controller in my previous life so I have a fair understanding of ATC and what it takes to be an ATCO.
The reply did and still does baffle me a tad, I was told I could, if i liked, apply like anyone else and, if successful, take the full course at Bournemouth whilst on a princely sum of just over £10000!! With the normal commitments of a 34 yr old, this just was not an option.
I know there are plenty of differences with Mil and Civ controlling, however, I am fairly confident that with some hard work on my part I would have made it. What wrangles most is that at no stage did I get any contact from any 'real' NATS people, just the faceless HR bunch!
Anyway, old subject I know, but it still stings all the same.
The reply did and still does baffle me a tad, I was told I could, if i liked, apply like anyone else and, if successful, take the full course at Bournemouth whilst on a princely sum of just over £10000!! With the normal commitments of a 34 yr old, this just was not an option.
I know there are plenty of differences with Mil and Civ controlling, however, I am fairly confident that with some hard work on my part I would have made it. What wrangles most is that at no stage did I get any contact from any 'real' NATS people, just the faceless HR bunch!
Anyway, old subject I know, but it still stings all the same.
Just reinforces the view I expressed at No 5 above.
By the way, if you use e-mail to HR, do NOT use the general enquiry address; I did this on another subject and didn't get a reply; when I asked about it I was told 'oh we rarely look at that mailbox as we're changing ths system'!!!
By the way, if you use e-mail to HR, do NOT use the general enquiry address; I did this on another subject and didn't get a reply; when I asked about it I was told 'oh we rarely look at that mailbox as we're changing ths system'!!!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: ireland
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you are interested.....
Most of the 36 new trainees joing the IAA next week are in their 30's.
I believe one of them is 44.
If you can believe a single word they say they will be recruiting another 36 next year or so.
I believe one of them is 44.
If you can believe a single word they say they will be recruiting another 36 next year or so.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
savechip .. don't feel too hard done by at the offer of a lower salary than you were earning. In the late 60s I was working overseas earning £2400 per year, tax-free excellent free accommodation, etc. I came back to the UK as an expereinced controller with a UK licence and went to work at a non-State airfield where I got about £1700. A year later I went to Heathrow and started on £1800! C'est la vie, as they say.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hants
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Savechip55
I was ex mil, extensive flying and latterly as an ATCO... ATCO Examiner and also Head of Training dept at one Unit. Both Terminal and Area.
I had to go through the whole rigmarole of training from the beginning and I can tell you this...
The aerodrome side is fairly easy (although different from Mil, if you have worked at a busy military airfield with a healthy mix of jets, turbo and helos working to crossing - active - runways as I had then it is a simple transition).
However, area is wholly different, especially if you go down the En-Route way instead of the TMA way.
As a member of the military, you of all people should be a realist. You have obviously got to your break point and had a look around. You had the choice of leaving and taking a big drop in salary to train.
What NATS offers is in black and white, whether you agree with it or not. You can always pay yourself through (no salary). This will give you a shorter course after you have undergone an APC assessment.
This is not available for area though.
About 6 years ago, NATS did try to 'fast track' 2 ex RAF Area controllers - NATS got their fingers burnt very badly and have wisely stepped back from doing it.
Yes it is a big pay drop - especially now, but there are still ex - mil people willing to take it, so maybe you need to be a bit less "I have done this, therefore I am a special case" and just accept that that is the way of things.
As for the HR dept – they are historically pretty poor as far as ATCO recruitment is concerned.
To tell the truth - I would go as far to say that we should have an ATCO on detachment to HR, either a 2 year full time secondment or at the very least a 2 year split post 50% HR, 50% controlling.
Maybe that way we will get a bit more realism brought into recruitment.
At the moment, people are getting through the paper sift when they cannot even spell their exam subjects correctly or - even worse, they fall outside laid down criteria (on the application form you have to answer questions regarding physical attributes etc... people who fall outside NATS laid down requirements are getting to assessment and interview stage - not fair on them, or on the interviewers).
It is a big drop and it is a risk to leave the military to join NATS, but the benefits are worth it (no secondary duties – good salary etc etc).
One tip for you – if you do eventually decide to join, try not to trumpet what you used to be – as you know from your own experiences, no one likes a trainee who thinks they know best.
I was ex mil, extensive flying and latterly as an ATCO... ATCO Examiner and also Head of Training dept at one Unit. Both Terminal and Area.
I had to go through the whole rigmarole of training from the beginning and I can tell you this...
The aerodrome side is fairly easy (although different from Mil, if you have worked at a busy military airfield with a healthy mix of jets, turbo and helos working to crossing - active - runways as I had then it is a simple transition).
However, area is wholly different, especially if you go down the En-Route way instead of the TMA way.
As a member of the military, you of all people should be a realist. You have obviously got to your break point and had a look around. You had the choice of leaving and taking a big drop in salary to train.
What NATS offers is in black and white, whether you agree with it or not. You can always pay yourself through (no salary). This will give you a shorter course after you have undergone an APC assessment.
This is not available for area though.
About 6 years ago, NATS did try to 'fast track' 2 ex RAF Area controllers - NATS got their fingers burnt very badly and have wisely stepped back from doing it.
Yes it is a big pay drop - especially now, but there are still ex - mil people willing to take it, so maybe you need to be a bit less "I have done this, therefore I am a special case" and just accept that that is the way of things.
As for the HR dept – they are historically pretty poor as far as ATCO recruitment is concerned.
To tell the truth - I would go as far to say that we should have an ATCO on detachment to HR, either a 2 year full time secondment or at the very least a 2 year split post 50% HR, 50% controlling.
Maybe that way we will get a bit more realism brought into recruitment.
At the moment, people are getting through the paper sift when they cannot even spell their exam subjects correctly or - even worse, they fall outside laid down criteria (on the application form you have to answer questions regarding physical attributes etc... people who fall outside NATS laid down requirements are getting to assessment and interview stage - not fair on them, or on the interviewers).
It is a big drop and it is a risk to leave the military to join NATS, but the benefits are worth it (no secondary duties – good salary etc etc).
One tip for you – if you do eventually decide to join, try not to trumpet what you used to be – as you know from your own experiences, no one likes a trainee who thinks they know best.