Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Serco's crumbling empire - part 3

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Serco's crumbling empire - part 3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jan 2008, 21:26
  #1 (permalink)  
niknak
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Serco's crumbling empire - part 3

A little bird within the Serco Aerospace empire tells me that, as the ATC contract for Wattisham comes up for renewal, said Serco head office bods are in a state of vexed worriment.
It appears that the MOD are seriously considering not bothering with a formal tender and the contract will allegedly, go directly to the RAF.

Middle Wallop and Hawarden will never be so well staffed....
niknak is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 08:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,839
Received 100 Likes on 73 Posts
I suppose the next course graduating from Shawbury will be available, but otherwise the RAF are as short of EXPERIENCED controllers as anyone else. As for the SERCO staff displaced, well I'm sure NATS could find a home for them eg Aberdeen.
chevvron is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 12:52
  #3 (permalink)  
niknak
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd heard the same about the lack of experienced ATCOs in the RAF.
Wattisham is relatively quiet and closed most weekends, but still requires full manning.
Despite that, the MOD, it seems, are still keen on having the RAF in and SERCO out.
niknak is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 13:34
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The land that taste forgot
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as for dwindling empires, anyone running a book on NATS keeping the Gibraltar contract?
man friday is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 16:34
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Niknak,

You need to stop listening to your little bird within SERCO sing!
Wattisham ATC Apr 08 - Apr 09 SERCO (extension of current contract)
Invitations to tender will go out for a 3 year contract starting Apr 09 with options on rollovers to a 4th and 5th year. RAF wont do it, cant do it, official!
204red is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 18:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Surrey
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mmmmmm SERCO out RAF in. Boscombe Down revisited? Seem to remember the RAF were short of staff then, but mysteriously conjured enuf up and used the magic green field validations
2.5 miles is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2008, 22:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: frozen norff
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bit of a difference between what happened at Boscombe Down and what might come to pass at Wattisham.

Airwork were in default from day 1 at Boscombe Down due to insufficient atcos, never mind any validated staff. An Airwork chief banana, RAF-retired, called in some RAF help and the MOD wanted the civvies out; which happened in due course.

SERCO have held the Wattisham ATC contract, compared to Airwork at Boscombe, for longer. A lot longer.
JustaFew is offline  
Old 30th Jan 2008, 14:49
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Home
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
as for dwindling empires, anyone running a book on NATS keeping the Gibraltar contract?
Loss-maker, yes.. So you'd think ditch it

But if they did that for all loss-making airport contracts... oooh
Me Me Me Me is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2008, 18:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,839
Received 100 Likes on 73 Posts
By the way, don't SERCO still have Cranfield?
chevvron is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2008, 21:57
  #10 (permalink)  
niknak
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apparently Serco have lost the Nth Denes contract to Marshalls Aerospace, it's said that the guys there were given 5 days to decide if they wanted to stay and work for the new mob, or stay with Serco and waddle around Hook until someone decided what to do with them.

Wattisham (regardless of when contract renewal is due) is firmly within the sights of the Cambridge howitzer...
niknak is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2008, 22:07
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Mysterious East
Posts: 384
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wattisham (regardless of when contract renewal is due) is firmly within the sights of the Cambridge howitzer...
Nothing new there, it's always been firmly in the sights of the Safeskys air rifle as well!
LXGB is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2008, 10:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The land that taste forgot
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAFESKY air rifle, they have gone up in the world from the days tricky dicky had Gib in the firing line of his pea shooter!
man friday is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2008, 16:50
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil serco's crumbling empire part 3

not only have they serco lost north denes they have lost the ATE contact at Redhill what next
airman sam is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2008, 18:14
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,839
Received 100 Likes on 73 Posts
They never kept Oxford for long did they? What was it about 2 years?
chevvron is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.