Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Heathrow Arrival Info 128.075

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Heathrow Arrival Info 128.075

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Jan 2008, 06:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow Arrival Info 128.075

Just a couple of "amateur" thoughts/suggestions from a non-aviator:

I am surprised that there is not more information, regarding the state of R/W 27L, other than ".....not available for landing". Is not the presence of the wreck and salvage cranes and activity, important information? I am thinking, for example, about the possibility of some sort of emergency which might cause a pilot to consider 27L as an emergency option for landing.

On a more general note, I am not impressed by the changes of voice, mid-sentence, in the ATIS recordings. I guess it saves a few minutes for the staff, but strikes me as not the best way unambiguously to communicate.

Comments, from those with relevant professional knowledge, would be of interest to me!

Well done to all at LHR for keeping the "show on the road" with some runway missing.
TCTC is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2008, 06:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If considering a rnwy that was not available, you would probably ask why is the rnwy not available ... then upon receiving the info, go to plan B. Most everyone would know why the rnwy was not available (in this case). The ATIS should be as short as possible so that important info, if missed, will "recycle" sooner.
Vic777 is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2008, 06:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,915
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Is not the presence of the wreck and salvage cranes and activity, important information?
Full details of such information, when necessary, would be published in NOTAMS* (read by pilots as part of their pre-flight planning).

ATIS broadcasts have to be kept brief - striking a balance between up to date info and information overload.


*Notices to Airmen
spekesoftly is online now  
Old 20th Jan 2008, 08:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<<I am surprised that there is not more information, regarding the state of R/W 27L, other than ".....not available for landing". Is not the presence of the wreck and salvage cranes and activity, important information? I am thinking, for example, about the possibility of some sort of emergency which might cause a pilot to consider 27L as an emergency option for landing.>>

I think the ATIS provided all the information which was necessary. No aircraft were being directed to 27L so there was no need to inform inbound pilots about what was happening. At times when the runway is fully serviceable it may still be "not available for landing" for a variety of reasons but the details are not necessarily broadcast.

In the event of an emergency a pilot doesn't simply head for a different runway. The airport authority may have a say in what the preferred runway would be for a real emergency and this would be put to the pilot some way out. If the emergency occurred so close that this information could not be conveyed it would be far too late to switch runways anyway. The decision where to land is the captain's, but he is unlikely to make the sort of radical change to plans which you infer.

The other problem is if, for some extraordinary reason, a pilot landing on 27R suddenly decided it would be better to switch over to 27L he would probably be confronted with a runway on which several aircraft might be lined up for take-off.

Hope all this helps.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2008, 08:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If an ATIS message is too long, then experience shows that many will switch off before the end, or perhaps they do listen but don't record the information.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2008, 18:47
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Many thanks, all, for your thoughts.
TCTC is offline  
Old 20th Jan 2008, 19:07
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northampton
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the idea is to keep it as brief as possible so it can 'recycle' quicker, what is the reason the Manchester ATIS regularly has a rather comprehensive weather forecast, much longer than the useful airfield info?

I'm landing in the next 20 minutes... I don't need to know what the weather is going to be like in 4 hours time!
superjet777 is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2008, 00:57
  #8 (permalink)  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
in regard the comment about the Voice change on the ATIS, i couldnt comment about the Heathrow version, but at most airfields its an automated system using a computer synthesised voice, that automatically produces the atis from the various sensors and computer equipment, the system off has also various stored messages built into it(for things that might need adding occasionally - such as windshear etc) However when there is something a little more unique to be added like a blocked taxiway etc, this is normally actualy recorded there and then by an Assistant and added to the standard message, so this will result in a sudden change in voice on the ATIS from the rest of the weather info. Does make it sound a bit strange, but in some ways highlights this unusual information, that may as yet not been notamed, or the crews even had chance to see a NOTAM regarding it as it may have occured whilst they were inflight.

ATIS messages are oftne criticised for their length, as others have pointed out, it needs to contain enough but not too much information that it lost in the gabble.
RadarRambler is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.