Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

A380 in service

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Oct 2007, 14:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Maastricht, NL
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 in service

Hi all,

Is here anyone, who have actually worked already with the SIA A380(s)? As I've heard they were planning to fly Singapore-Sydney... Since as I've noticed there're a few Australian chaps here, I thought maybe...
I'd be curious what separation do you apply - since during the test flights we had to apply 2000' or 10 nm which was quite a pain... I hope now it's standard RVSM separation...
Cheers!
Jagohu is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2007, 14:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The frequency jungle
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We also only had them on the test flights. Those seps are crazy in RVSM airspace. Don't think that there will be any change to those criteria.
126,7 is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2007, 15:22
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: 24 27 45.66N 54 22 42.28E
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They did all their hot weather testing here at Al Ain near Abu Dhabi (UAE) and the first time they were here we had increased separation, but by the last trip we had been advised by ICAO that they were a normal heavy and were to be treated as such, so 5 NM radar separation and one thousand feet.
AirNoServicesAustralia is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2007, 22:52
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the UK, a new vortex category, called "super", coded "J" on flight plans, has been created.

ATSIN 93 gives the vortex separation, and the next amendment of the MATS Part 1 will incorporate the new category.

Basically, it's a category above Heavy, and adds a couple of miles to the distance of the various categories following behind.
SonicTPA is offline  
Old 23rd Oct 2007, 23:48
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: On a Ship Near You
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the UK, a new vortex category, called "super", coded "J" on flight plans, has been created.
Same in Oz, but it begs the question isn't it smaller than the Antinov, so why no "super" category for that one?

The extra wake turb adds from memory about 2 to 4 miles on top of the current "H" tables, 6 between a J and H, 8 between a J and M, 10 between a J and an L, I think; but 1000ft is ok, even in RVSM and 5NM lateral ok too.
SM4 Pirate is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2007, 13:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: France
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Same in Oz, but it begs the question isn't it smaller than the Antinov, so why no "super" category for that one?
Maybe because the Antonov is no competitor to a Seattle based Cie?
dunadan06 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2007, 14:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looked after the one that went through on the delivery flight, all I know is that it smoked on descent! Caught us off guard a bit and I think he cruises at 'Thumper' speeds too, 0.85 - 0.86.

BIG and fast
Fox3snapshot is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2007, 09:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Prague, CZ
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

EDIT:
extract of
ICAO doc TEC/OPS/SEP (T11/72) – 06-0320.SLG (9 October 2006) - Wake Vortex Aspects of A380 aircraft
(work of the experts of JAA, FAA, EUROCONTROL and AIRBUS)

2. INDICATION OF AIRCRAFT TYPE
2.1 For A380-800 aircraft the letter “J” should be entered into the space allocated to wake turbulence under Item 9 of the ICAO flight plan.
2.2 For A380-800 aircraft the expression “SUPER” should be included immediately after the aircraft call sign in the initial radiotelephony contact between such aircraft and ATS units.

4. RADAR WAKE TURBULENCE SEPARATION MINIMA
4.1 The following wake turbulence radar separation minima should be applied to aircraft in the approach and departure phases of flight...

Preceding aircraft/Succeeding aircraft/Vortex sep.minima
A380-800............A380-800............7.4 km (4.0 NM)
A380-800............HEAVY................11.1 km (6.0 NM)
A380-800............MEDIUM..............14.8 km (8.0 NM)
A380-800............LIGHT.................18.5 km (10.0 NM)


the whole thing > http://www.eurocontrol.int/safety/ga...20aircraft.pdf

Last edited by lukas_rasa; 1st Nov 2007 at 10:02.
lukas_rasa is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2007, 13:10
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Maastricht, NL
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lukas_rasa:

Yeah, I've seen that a year ago, but since then nothing has changed in our procedures - although we're the company who issued that report, for me it seems like noone really cares to believe the experts who did it or to do something...
Jagohu is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2007, 13:16
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mauritius,soon or latter
Posts: 542
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Yeah, I've seen that a year ago, but since then nothing has changed in our procedures
What do you expect from EC? To work for money under time presure?
SINGAPURCANAC is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2007, 17:54
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: deep blue somewhere
Age: 50
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well JAGOHU .... Seems like you need to brush up on the internal notes and other briefing sheets before your QMP!!!
April 2007 is where you want to look at.
Since the 10th of May 2007 , it is - clearly - stipulated that seperation standards ( for en-route ) are the ones applied for all other traffic , i.e. 1000 feet (2000 feet if Non-RVSM) and 5NM.
Singapurcanac , the interest of your inputs are often reverse-proportional to the beauty of your location...
cheers
LevelD
levelD is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2007, 21:51
  #12 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Maastricht, NL
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm, I was on leave then, so that's why... Anyway thanks a lot, I'll have a look at it next cycle!
Jagohu is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2007, 12:07
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: -
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Worked the proving/trial/test (whatever) flights back and forth across the 'Pond' - made no odds to us Oceanic bods. Just another punter with ADS/CPDLC - which is nice
rab-k is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.