Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

ICAO Document Question

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

ICAO Document Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Aug 2007, 13:34
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Out on the catwalk
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ICAO Document Question

Greetings,

Just a short question - I'm pretty sure that, in the past, I read some guidance in an ICAO document that specified that the ATS log was to be maintained in a bound ledger with numbered pages. Now that I'm searching for that reference, I can't find it.

I've read what Doc 9426 (the Air Traffic Services Planning Manual) has to say about ATS log maintenance, but the reference that I thought I remembered (about being maintained in a bound ledger) isn't there.

If this reference does exist, can anyone help me out by telling me where it is?

Thanks in advance.

Catwalker
Catwalker is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2007, 20:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In ICAO Annex 1, personal log book could only be found when it comes to "Maintenance of competency" for the flight crew member.
The only log book I know of, for ATC staff, is training log, but I gess it is not what you meant. Sorry
J.
jovica is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2007, 02:27
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Out on the catwalk
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jovica,

No reason to be sorry - thanks for looking for me anyway.

I'm starting to think that perhaps the reference that I was sure I had seen really doesn't exist, but I just can't for the life of me imagine why the memory of seeing it is still so strong. Maybe I'm just getting old . . .

Or perhaps it was a country-specific reference?

Catwalker
Catwalker is offline  
Old 7th Aug 2007, 21:57
  #4 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Used to say that in the UK docs - but it changed a few years ago to permit electronic logs.
 
Old 8th Aug 2007, 16:38
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Out on the catwalk
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That answers my question - thanks to all!

I do wonder, however, why the change to allow electronic record-keeping was allowed. As I understood the reason "back then," the hand-written bound volume was required because it precluded the possibility of an official record being altered after the fact, something that electronic record-keeping doesn't preclude - or have steps been taken to guard against this?

In any event, thanks again to all.

Catwalker
Catwalker is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2007, 04:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The World, although sometimes I wonder
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As the log book is a legal document it is required to be properly bound and pages are numbered accordingly.

Your local CAA regulations should tell you how long they should be kept'

As to electronic documents, they should have some sort of "blocking devince" contained within them to prevent any manipulation of past entries. It should be a live document, ie any entry made will automatically include the time and any amendment required to be made to a previous entry will require the person to enter a password to edit the document.
Goldfish Jack is offline  
Old 9th Aug 2007, 05:25
  #7 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Here's what the UK requirements are now (out of MATS Part 1)
9 ATC Watch Log

9.1 An ATC Watch Log detailing significant events and operational information of note to controllers and unit management shall be maintained by each air traffic control unit.

9.2 Whatever the format used to maintain the ATC Watch Log, it shall include the name of the ATC unit and the period for which the log contains entries and shall be capable of providing a documentary record of entries made.

9.3 An ATC Watch Log shall permit descriptive text associated with a particular date and time (in UTC) to be recorded and enable the identity of the author to be established. Entries shall be made in chronological order and, as far as possible, concurrently with the events being recorded and should be of sufficient detail to enable subsequent investigation of events to have a complete understanding of actions taken by ATC.

9.4 Items logged shall include:
  • changes to the serviceability of radio and radar aids;
  • essential aerodrome information and changes to runway in use (at aerodrome based units);
  • result of routine equipment checks conducted by controllers;
  • details of reportable events such as aircraft accidents, incidents and AIRPROXs;
  • any unusual occurrences;
  • handover of responsibility for providing ATC services and, at units not operating throughout the 24-hour period, times of opening and closing of watch.

9.5 An ATC Watch Log shall normally be maintained in each control room or in association with each operational control position. When approved by the CAA, and where a suitable unit management structure exists, a single Watch Log may be maintained in respect of more than one control room or operational position.

9.6 Measures shall be taken to ensure that entries made in an ATC Watch Log cannot subsequently be altered or in any other way be tampered with.

9.7 The method by which the ATC Watch Log is managed and entries made shall be detailed in MATS Part 2.
Seems to work OK.

Goldfish, I'm not sure why the ATC log is considered to be any more 'legal' than any other document that might get pulled out in court or wherever sometime. As far as I'm aware it doesn't have any particular or special status in the UK. Certainly it doesn't seem any more important in reconstructing events than the strips and many units now use electronic strips.
 
Old 9th Aug 2007, 07:05
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,172
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Spitoon
Good point. It always bugs me when I see "legal documents" used to refer to any old piece of paper. "Official documents" would be an appropriate term.
Catwalker
Was your original question prompted by the fact that the UK CAA no longer produces the traditional Watch Logs that comply with the conditions to which you refer? This presents a problem for the units that still use log books - and which, I trust, will continue to do so!
2 s

Last edited by 2 sheds; 9th Aug 2007 at 09:11. Reason: Grammar - out of deference to Fowler and the principles of Bern Oulli!
2 sheds is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.