Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

CAT II/III and lighting failure...

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

CAT II/III and lighting failure...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2007, 16:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: FG11
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAT II/III and lighting failure...

If the met conditions meant that CAT II/III approachs were being made and you had your RWY and APP lights on, would the failure of, say, 3 RWY edge lights or a few APP bulbs blown mean that ops would have to cease? Or could the information be passed as 'essential aerodrome information' to the pilot so that they could decide for themselves?
Cheers
Q
Quincy M.E. is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2007, 16:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunny Warwickshire
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The info would be passed as essential aerodrome information and the pilots would decide if they can continue. Most probably would as all they need to be able to do to complete the approach is see 1 light at DH. The fact that a couple of lights might be out shouldn't hinder operations, I've known 1 circuit of lights to have failed and crews continue to land as they still have the pattern available.
radar707 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2007, 16:48
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: FG11
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ah I see, thanks. So there is no regulation specifying a percentage of lights that must be illuminated for the system to be servicable? And the aerodrome authority wouldnt close the RWY?
Quincy M.E. is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2007, 16:59
  #4 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Depends a bit where you are I think. In the UK I recall there are some rules about more than two consecutive lights being u/s mean that the runway cannot be made available for cat II/III. I think also that there's something about more than 50% lights u/s being unacceptable too - so if your AGL system is set up as two circuits powering alternate lights, when one circuit fails you still see the same visual pattern but if one fitting on the circuit that is working is u/s (which would give three consecutive fittings out) you are more than 50% out. Hope that makes sense.
 
Old 7th Jul 2007, 17:06
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: FG11
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah that makes sense. I think I am going to have to trawl through CAP 168! I know I mentioned CAT II/III but I guess that lighting requirements would be the same for CAT I?
Quincy M.E. is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2007, 17:10
  #6 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you're in the UK CAP168 is your bible but you'll find that there are significantly more stringent requirements for cat II/III ops than for cat I. Also, you might want to look in the Aerodrome Manual and MATS Part 2 for local procedures about withdrawing runways from service etc.
 
Old 7th Jul 2007, 17:12
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: FG11
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just checked: inner 450m APP needs 95% for CAT II/III and 85% for CAT I etc.

Thanks for your help.
Quincy M.E. is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.