Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Procedural Separation Question

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Procedural Separation Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jun 2007, 14:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Procedural Separation Question

What are the criteria used to seperate IFR traffic by radial? For instance, if I am on a departure clearance tracking a radial out from a facility, when can inbound traffic (on a different radial) be cleared through my level, if we at similar DME?
Woof etc is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2007, 15:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the example you stated,

Using a VOR and associated DME/TACAN station. Both aircraft must have reported established on radials at least 20° apart.
One aircraft inbound and the other outbound from the VOR station, [track separation is established], provided that the outbound aircraft is at least 20 miles OR the inbound at least 30 miles from the station.

There are other criteria for two a/c inbound or two a/c outbound. These, and conditions attached to the separation standards can be found in CAP 493, Manual of Air Traffic Services (part 1), Section 1 Chapter 3.

VL
VectorLine is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2007, 16:00
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,172
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
VL

You are quoting from UK separations. The enquirer is not from the UK and ICAO does not admit to such a separation, therefore it would be specified by the individual State.
2 sheds is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2007, 18:17
  #4 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2 Sheds is correct.

ICAO standards can be found in Doc 4444. Section 3 for Area Control and Section 4 for Approach Control.

Link is http://http://www.decea.gov.br/pame/...o/doc/4444.pdf
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2007, 01:29
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for the info!
Woof etc is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2007, 09:09
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the Dog house
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ahhh . The joys of ICAOstandardisation - not!!

And why do they (ICAO) exist again?


Lat sep tables are published Downunder in MATS. I think they were created by a guy in the mil who actually got a medal/ recommendation for it!!

No use in the UK as the airspace cant be policed / owned / monitered - far too small and too many unknown users therein!

BD
BurglarsDog is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2007, 20:52
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My thoughts on ICAO exactly. What standardisation???

PPRUNE RADAR: Couldnt get the link to work. Found the doc here:

http://www.decea.gov.br/pame/publicacao/doc/4444.pdf
Woof etc is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2007, 06:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: South of England
Posts: 1,172
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re various comments above about "standards" and "standardisation", these are not quite accurate. The separation minima (the UK confuses the issue by referring to "separation standards"!) are specified in PANS, not as Standards or Recommended Practices (SARPS) as such.
From ICAO...
"The Procedures for Air Navigation Services (PANS) do not have the same status as the Standards and Recommended Practices. While the latter are adopted by Council in pursuance of Article 37 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation, subject to the full procedure of Article 90, the PANS are approved by the Council and recommended to Contracting States for world-wide application.
Whilst the PANS may contain material which may eventually become Standards or Recommended Practices (SARPs) when it has reached the maturity and stability necessary for adoption as such, they may also comprise material prepared as an amplification of the basic principles in the corresponding SARPs, and designed particularly to assist the user in the application of those SARPs.
The implementation of procedures is the responsibility of Contracting States; they are applied in actual operations only after, and in so far as, States have enforced them. However, with a view to facilitating their processing towards implementation by States, they have been prepared in language which will permit direct use by air traffic services personnel and others associated with the provision of air traffic services to international air navigation."

Last edited by 2 sheds; 5th Jun 2007 at 09:37.
2 sheds is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2007, 00:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Orstralia
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, answering woof's question, 15 degrees apart = 15 NM under ICAO. 15 degrees = 16 NM here, 15 degrees is 20 NM in US, and so on...
jumpuFOKKERjump is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2007, 09:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: There's no place like home!
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's not forget that under ICAO Doc4444 there's also a DVOR separation of 30deg's and 15nm!
EastCoaster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.