Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

orbit

Old 28th May 2007 | 20:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: suburbia
orbit

what is the rule to give an orbit clearance to an ifr traffic ?can it be given when she is on the ils
alpergokgoz is offline  
Reply
Old 28th May 2007 | 21:18
  #2 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
From: This is the internet FFS.........
I've certainly seen it done for spacing or an aircraft too high above the glide...........as long as the aircraft is above the minimum vectoring altitude and won't descend below it until established on the ILS again. I would probably cancel the approach clearance, issue an altitude and the re-issue the approach clearance when established again.
Jerricho is offline  
Reply
Old 29th May 2007 | 14:10
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: uk
ICAO ATC Comms Doc 4444 defines "orbit" as a delaying tactic when in the vicinity of an airport. It can therefore be given at any stage when close to an airport and does not have to be IFR only. I have orbited some of the finest airports in the world - prior to holding area, during intermediate approach and on an ILS and non-precision approach and had VFR traffic orbit downwind for my benefit!
skiesfull is offline  
Reply
Old 30th May 2007 | 09:07
  #4 (permalink)  
cdb
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Up, up and away
I'm a procedural approach (without radar) and tower controller.

If an IFR aircraft is VMC I would orbit no problem, if the weather was dodgy I'd say "orbit mantaining own terrain separation, or go around"

If the aircraft is IMC I wouldn't allow an orbit unless the pilot initiated the request and agreed to mantain their own terrain separation. In this case I would suggest a missed approach would be the safer option.

However, if you have radar I imagine it would be fine to approve an orbit, subject to the RMAC (radar minimum levels chart). Perhaps you would say "Orbit approved, not below 1000' until re-established on the ILS". I don't have a ticket though, so don't count me on this!
cdb is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.