Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Reasons for Transponders

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Reasons for Transponders

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th March 2007 | 22:49
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,933
Likes: 143
From: Warrington, UK
Reasons for Transponders

When giving GA traffic a transponder code, Liverpool ATC generally add that it is for "conspicuity". I would have thought that was a fairly obvious reason, so why the need to state it? Is there any other reason?
MightyGem is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2007 | 23:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: England
But not obvious to some people!
It is emphasised to stop some people thinking they are receiving a radar service and also to prevent the fairly common response of " you've given that code to me as well".
Its only one particular code of 0260 and is neither validated nor verified.
Friio4 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2007 | 23:21
  #3 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 7
From: Sometimes north, sometimes south
I'd be prepared to bet that the vast majority of VFR pilots (and probably a fair chunk of IFRs) don't know what "conspicuity code" (as opposed to any other purpose of a squawk) means, nor indeed would they know what "validated" or "verified" means, so telling them wouldn't achieve much other than maybe covering your back if there's an incident. Same goes for many other ATC practices.
NS
NorthSouth is offline  
Reply
Old 19th March 2007 | 00:10
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 3,933
Likes: 143
From: Warrington, UK
Thanks Friio.
MightyGem is offline  
Reply
Old 19th March 2007 | 14:29
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
From: Hants, UK
There are many codes allocated to units across the UK, some of which are 'conspicuity codes' (they are not all 0260). As well as the explanation given by Friio4, the instruction to select a conspicuity code (which may be allocated to a non-SSR or radar equipped unit such as Cranfield Approach or Cambridge Approach) can allow neighbouring radar units to know who to call if they want to know about something that traffic is doing.
eyeinthesky is offline  
Reply
Old 21st March 2007 | 04:42
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
From: California USA
OK. Would you be so kind as to play "help the Yank" again? Why the 'conspicuity codes?' Is this not a discreet code environment? Granted, I've only been doing this for about 26 years, but I've only had to work four nondiscreet codes in my career: 1200 (VFR), 7500, 7600, and 7700. What's with assigning nondiscreet codes for conspicuity? Why not a discreet code?

Thanks in advance,

Dave
av8boy is offline  
Reply
Old 21st March 2007 | 12:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,648
Likes: 2
From: UK
The conspicuity code only signals that the aircraft is under the control of a particular ATSU, for the benefit of other radar units. To use discrete codes would be pointless (such aircraft don't need to be distinguished from each other as they have not been identified by a radar unit) and we're short enough of Mode A codes already in the UK.
bookworm is offline  
Reply
Old 21st March 2007 | 22:00
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,218
Likes: 0
From: Surrey
Originally Posted by av8boy
OK. Would you be so kind as to play "help the Yank" again? Why the 'conspicuity codes?' Is this not a discreet code environment? Granted, I've only been doing this for about 26 years, but I've only had to work four nondiscreet codes in my career: 1200 (VFR), 7500, 7600, and 7700. What's with assigning nondiscreet codes for conspicuity? Why not a discreet code?
From just a pilot's perspective - The US system seems to allow any controller who might issue a code to 'push a button' and get a unique code from a large pool; where as, the European system seems to have many codes pre-allocated and hence a limited (possibly nil) pool of codes for general allocation. I suspect that, in the UK, codes that are issued to all flights not on an 'airways flight plan' come from a set that are preallocated to that controlling unit and therefore frequently not unique.


I would be interested in hearing more from the controllers both sides of the pond if my 'user perception' is broadly correct.
mm_flynn is offline  
Reply
Old 21st March 2007 | 23:58
  #9 (permalink)  
cdb
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Up, up and away
mm_flynn

absolutely correct from the UK perspective - I can't comment from the US one.

Over here, international flights are allocated an "ORCAM" squawk, one specific for the FIR you are departing to, and retained through the entire flight. All other flights don't have this luxury - every ATC unit has a set of squawks allocated to it, so every time you change unit you will have to change squawk.

The advantage of this is that we can see who you're working from your squawk. I believe for example that a 370x squawk means you're under Brize Zone control, while a 371x squawk means you're under a service from Brize radar - helpful as you know which button to press on the phone.
cdb is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd March 2007 | 17:53
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: UK
Maybe worth a note that the UK system is still driven by NAS. We can press a button and get a code. We do have an increasinf code shortage in Europe, how are rhese codes managed in the US, do you have shortages?
Also for our American colleagues; how many NAS systems operate in California?

Conspicuity codes mean the transponder is on = TCAS targets
Minesapint is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd March 2007 | 18:14
  #11 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,456
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
Eurocontrol's Centralised Code Assignment and Management System (CCAMS) will be phased in at the end of 2008; see page 3 of 'Readability 5' April 2007 from GATCO for further info.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd March 2007 | 19:08
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: UK
Chevron, NATS have been taking a very active role in CCAMS development. 2008 is for some former eastern block states, more like 2011 here.
Minesapint is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd March 2007 | 12:12
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: South of UK
Hmm, SO CCAMS will comein just as we getting close to implementing the use of Mode S Flight ID instead of Mode A to identify flights......yay for the strategy teams
Radarspod is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd March 2007 | 16:13
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: UK
What makes you think we are close?

Mode A code utilisation will be around for a while yet. Too many legacy systems are still in use which rely on Mode A, both in the air and on the ground.
Singe de Graisse is offline  
Reply
Old 24th March 2007 | 09:03
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: South of UK
It was my understanding that limited use of Mode S Flight ID was coming soon at Maastricht UAC, with associated Mode A conspicuity codes in use for Mode S flights.
Radarspod is offline  
Reply
Old 25th March 2007 | 20:22
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
From: UK
The date for Mode S flight identity is "under discussion" - watch this space

Maastricht in 2008 is planned, PM me if you want the other dates.
Minesapint is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.