Reasons for Transponders
Thread Starter
Reasons for Transponders
When giving GA traffic a transponder code, Liverpool ATC generally add that it is for "conspicuity". I would have thought that was a fairly obvious reason, so why the need to state it? Is there any other reason?
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But not obvious to some people!
It is emphasised to stop some people thinking they are receiving a radar service and also to prevent the fairly common response of " you've given that code to me as well".
Its only one particular code of 0260 and is neither validated nor verified.
It is emphasised to stop some people thinking they are receiving a radar service and also to prevent the fairly common response of " you've given that code to me as well".
Its only one particular code of 0260 and is neither validated nor verified.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Sometimes north, sometimes south
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
1 Post
I'd be prepared to bet that the vast majority of VFR pilots (and probably a fair chunk of IFRs) don't know what "conspicuity code" (as opposed to any other purpose of a squawk) means, nor indeed would they know what "validated" or "verified" means, so telling them wouldn't achieve much other than maybe covering your back if there's an incident. Same goes for many other ATC practices.
NS
NS
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Hants, UK
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are many codes allocated to units across the UK, some of which are 'conspicuity codes' (they are not all 0260). As well as the explanation given by Friio4, the instruction to select a conspicuity code (which may be allocated to a non-SSR or radar equipped unit such as Cranfield Approach or Cambridge Approach) can allow neighbouring radar units to know who to call if they want to know about something that traffic is doing.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California USA
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK. Would you be so kind as to play "help the Yank" again? Why the 'conspicuity codes?' Is this not a discreet code environment? Granted, I've only been doing this for about 26 years, but I've only had to work four nondiscreet codes in my career: 1200 (VFR), 7500, 7600, and 7700. What's with assigning nondiscreet codes for conspicuity? Why not a discreet code?
Thanks in advance,
Dave
Thanks in advance,
Dave
The conspicuity code only signals that the aircraft is under the control of a particular ATSU, for the benefit of other radar units. To use discrete codes would be pointless (such aircraft don't need to be distinguished from each other as they have not been identified by a radar unit) and we're short enough of Mode A codes already in the UK.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by av8boy
OK. Would you be so kind as to play "help the Yank" again? Why the 'conspicuity codes?' Is this not a discreet code environment? Granted, I've only been doing this for about 26 years, but I've only had to work four nondiscreet codes in my career: 1200 (VFR), 7500, 7600, and 7700. What's with assigning nondiscreet codes for conspicuity? Why not a discreet code?
I would be interested in hearing more from the controllers both sides of the pond if my 'user perception' is broadly correct.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Up, up and away
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mm_flynn
absolutely correct from the UK perspective - I can't comment from the US one.
Over here, international flights are allocated an "ORCAM" squawk, one specific for the FIR you are departing to, and retained through the entire flight. All other flights don't have this luxury - every ATC unit has a set of squawks allocated to it, so every time you change unit you will have to change squawk.
The advantage of this is that we can see who you're working from your squawk. I believe for example that a 370x squawk means you're under Brize Zone control, while a 371x squawk means you're under a service from Brize radar - helpful as you know which button to press on the phone.
absolutely correct from the UK perspective - I can't comment from the US one.
Over here, international flights are allocated an "ORCAM" squawk, one specific for the FIR you are departing to, and retained through the entire flight. All other flights don't have this luxury - every ATC unit has a set of squawks allocated to it, so every time you change unit you will have to change squawk.
The advantage of this is that we can see who you're working from your squawk. I believe for example that a 370x squawk means you're under Brize Zone control, while a 371x squawk means you're under a service from Brize radar - helpful as you know which button to press on the phone.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maybe worth a note that the UK system is still driven by NAS. We can press a button and get a code. We do have an increasinf code shortage in Europe, how are rhese codes managed in the US, do you have shortages?
Also for our American colleagues; how many NAS systems operate in California?
Conspicuity codes mean the transponder is on = TCAS
targets
Also for our American colleagues; how many NAS systems operate in California?
Conspicuity codes mean the transponder is on = TCAS
targets
Eurocontrol's Centralised Code Assignment and Management System (CCAMS) will be phased in at the end of 2008; see page 3 of 'Readability 5' April 2007 from GATCO for further info.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brighton
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What makes you think we are close?
Mode A code utilisation will be around for a while yet. Too many legacy systems are still in use which rely on Mode A, both in the air and on the ground.
Mode A code utilisation will be around for a while yet. Too many legacy systems are still in use which rely on Mode A, both in the air and on the ground.
