Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Standard Instrument Departures

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Standard Instrument Departures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th February 2007 | 20:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 29
From: LEEDS
Standard Instrument Departures

Can anyone tell me who or what devises SIDS in the UK ? LBA is a relatively new user of SIDS (1995 I think it was) and I guessed it might have been the local ATC unit who dreamed them up or at least had a hand in their creation. Would this be correct or is it a CAA department ?

Thankyou.

MC
Mooncrest is offline  
Reply
Old 8th February 2007 | 20:45
  #2 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 1
From: UK
NATS are doing the redesign of the whole of the LTMA.

BD
BDiONU is offline  
Reply
Old 11th February 2007 | 09:57
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: South East England
BDiONU............

"NATS are doing the redesign of the whole of the LTMA".

Is this part-and-parcel of the plan outlined in today's Sunday Times to restructure the CAS system, and which is under discussion here: http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=263759 ?

Ta,

N o t a
None of the above is offline  
Reply
Old 11th February 2007 | 10:13
  #4 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 1
From: UK
Originally Posted by None of the above
BDiONU............
Is this part-and-parcel of the plan outlined in today's Sunday Times to restructure the CAS system, and which is under discussion here: http://www.pprune.org/forums/showthread.php?t=263759 ?
N o t a thanks for the link, wasn't aware of that discussion but I agree with posters comments that NATS is driven in that instance by the government. Another driver is demand, given that NATS gets penalties for delay its in the companies interest to stay ahead of demand as best as possible. Hence re-sectorisations and the drive to replace the 4 disparate en route centres systems down to 3 (ScOACC + MACC, LTCC & LACC) and then eventually onto 1 for both centres (Scottish & London).
In the case of the LTMA re-design additional drivers are mixed mode at Heathrow and the additional runway planned at Stansted and probably Heathrow.
One thing I should point out thats totally false in the linked article is:
Steve Charlish, a commercial pilot who has led a campaign against increasing air traffic over the East Midlands, said: “If Nats were proposing a new motorway or bypass you could object but one thing you cannot do is touch the airspace above because that is owned by the crown - you’ve got no right of objection.”
Everyone may object, it is your right. Does anyone in this forum recall the QC in East anglia who objected to 'visual pollution' due to the re-structure of South east sectors? Or the delay in opening the Bristol/Cardiff airspace recently due to environmental concerns? My department has just employed 2 new staff whose job is environmental (airspace matters not recycling paper ).

Glad my boss made the strong point that some airspace changes are being done for safety reasons as well

BD
BDiONU is offline  
Reply
Old 11th February 2007 | 10:26
  #5 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
SIDs are normally designed by DAP (The CAA Directorate of Airspace Policy), but I believe NATS may be an 'approved organisation' now for design (for a fee of course)
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 11th February 2007 | 10:40
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: South East England
Thanks for that BDiONU.

There's a paragraph or two in the Sunday Times article that deserve(s) exposure to a wider audience:

'Smith was looking for a peaceful corner of England in which to bring up his children and moved to the hamlet of Cornard Tye in 1999.
“One of the best things about this area was that you could sit in the garden and hear birds singing,” he said.
“Then one day I was sitting in my office at home when I heard a plane going over, then another and then another.
When I rang the Civil Aviation Authority and asked what had happened they told me the air corridors had been changed.
“We now get easyJets and Ryanairs one after another. Some fly so low we can see the wheels and the people inside",'

A quick look at a chart shows that his home is approximately 25 miles from Stansted.

How do newspapers get away with continually printing this tripe?

Last edited by None of the above; 11th February 2007 at 12:35.
None of the above is offline  
Reply
Old 11th February 2007 | 10:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
From: Hants
BDiNOU

I am posting on the other forum, however in yet another great piece of journalistic misdirection, it has been pointed out by Chilli monster that the 'commercial pilot' Steve Charlish, is in fact a balloon pilot!!

So effectively a member of the public being touted as an informed source

The gutter press and the so called broad sheets seem to get closer and closer in integrity these days
anotherthing is offline  
Reply
Old 11th February 2007 | 11:12
  #8 (permalink)  
Beady Eye
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,495
Likes: 1
From: UK
Originally Posted by anotherthing
BDiNOU
Its BDiONU, say it out loud and it'll all make sense

Beady Eye
BDiONU is offline  
Reply
Old 11th February 2007 | 11:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
From: Hants
Eyed worked out what your moniker meant a while ago - typos are my forte though
anotherthing is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.