cost cutting or a good idea
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The land that taste forgot
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cost cutting or a good idea
just heard that the plan is to train a couple of ATSA's as approach radar controllers only at my unit. Neither have any previous controlling experience, and one with only limited ATSA experience, never having been sent on even a basic ATSA's course.
we are short staffed and this appears to be a quick 3 month fix to the problem of ATCO numbers, what will become of the ATSA's as their numbers are poached we dont know as they're a bit thin on the ground too.
Traditionally ATSA's were given tower ratings first and then returned to the unit to validate before moving up to approach radar, but since the change of management this tried and tested method of staff career development seems to have been dropped.
have any other units gone down this cost cutting ( or streamlined, depending on point of view) route, and what was the end result, competent radar controllers or bemused ATCO's with very little experience.
we are short staffed and this appears to be a quick 3 month fix to the problem of ATCO numbers, what will become of the ATSA's as their numbers are poached we dont know as they're a bit thin on the ground too.
Traditionally ATSA's were given tower ratings first and then returned to the unit to validate before moving up to approach radar, but since the change of management this tried and tested method of staff career development seems to have been dropped.
have any other units gone down this cost cutting ( or streamlined, depending on point of view) route, and what was the end result, competent radar controllers or bemused ATCO's with very little experience.
StandupfortheUlstermen
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm afraid I don't see where your objection is. We are considering putting people into radar first and don't see why it would cause us any problems. Part of it depends on how many 'tower onlys' there are. At the minute, we've got too many and radar courses aren't coming up fast enough (or we can't release people for them due to operational reasons), therefore it makes sense to train new starts in RAD first to alleviate staffing issues.
For years student ATCOs have been posted into TC at LATCC with only an APR rating and started there. At least your ATSAs will have some experience of the Tower at Gib. If you want them to have more, then program some time in their training for them to sit with the Tower guys to see it from that end.
For years student ATCOs have been posted into TC at LATCC with only an APR rating and started there. At least your ATSAs will have some experience of the Tower at Gib. If you want them to have more, then program some time in their training for them to sit with the Tower guys to see it from that end.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh my God!!! I've just realised that I had no previous ATC experience before I did the Aerodrome course at Hurn. And I was posted to Heathrow! What were they thinking????????
What about salary bands? If there are tower controllers wanting to move (up?) to approach who have their promotion delayed as a result of streamlining, that's a concern.
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As long as they attend a good training course and are properly trained by competent conrtrollers there can be no problem. I did not have a radar rating until I joined the "Ministry" in 1971 and following a radar course at Hurn I went straight to Heathrow. There are many, many previously-inexperienced ATCOs doing radar at busy units...
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Apa, apo ndi kulikonse!
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gonzo
Oh my God!!! I've just realised that I had no previous ATC experience before I did the Aerodrome course at Hurn. And I was posted to Heathrow! What were they thinking????????
NATS for a while had ATCOs who (for a number of reasons) ended up tower only at radar/tower units - which made little business sense.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably over 90% of the approach trainees at TC come direct from the college with no other rating or previous experience.
Some do very well and some struggle as has generally always been the case.
It is probably fair to say though that the more rounded experience that was the older and longer student atco/cadet course produced an overall higher standard of trainee arriving at the unit.
I do feel a bit sorry at times for the current system throwing our barely able to swim students in at the deep end with only a half inflated rubber rings worth of experience to help support them!
Some do very well and some struggle as has generally always been the case.
It is probably fair to say though that the more rounded experience that was the older and longer student atco/cadet course produced an overall higher standard of trainee arriving at the unit.
I do feel a bit sorry at times for the current system throwing our barely able to swim students in at the deep end with only a half inflated rubber rings worth of experience to help support them!
Last edited by Roffa; 22nd Aug 2006 at 18:24.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The land that taste forgot
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
standard noise,
no objection to anyones career advancement, i was mearley questioning if too much was being asked of the individuals, and would it be more beneficial to do the aerodrome course first and gain some experience that way.
no objection to anyones career advancement, i was mearley questioning if too much was being asked of the individuals, and would it be more beneficial to do the aerodrome course first and gain some experience that way.
You say a quick 3 month fix, but how can they do ANY controlling without passing an approved course which will take up to a year or have I missed something?
I'd volunteer to come and help for a while, but the missus doesn't fancy Gib.
I'd volunteer to come and help for a while, but the missus doesn't fancy Gib.
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South East
Age: 56
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ab-initio course first to learn the ANO etc. Then formal training. Assuming they pass the course, then OJT.
Finally validation by the powers that be. I don't see the problem.
With the shortage of controllers out there, training your own seems like a sensible option.
Finally validation by the powers that be. I don't see the problem.
With the shortage of controllers out there, training your own seems like a sensible option.
StandupfortheUlstermen
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
man friday - I wasn't thinking of career development, but as someone who was trained to go to TC and validate approach radar, I don't see why people can't be trained like that for less busy units. Anyway, if someone at a NATS unit is tower only, there can be a ceiling on their salary in certain circumstances (for new units like Gib and Briss) whereas I'm told that salary cap doesn't apply if they validate radar first. Airfield contracts are too tight to have staff valid in only one position, so I would have thought that 'career development' will follow as soon as the unit can afford, for operational reasons, to send the ATCO on an ADC course. You need to think outside the box with this one.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: The land that taste forgot
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the main problem is that we're a small unit, usually only 2 controllers, 1 tower only guy and the other valid in both positions and able to give the tower chap a break as required.
if we end up with tower only and radar only controllers breaks will become a problem, unless we have some additional plumbing installed!!!!
if we end up with tower only and radar only controllers breaks will become a problem, unless we have some additional plumbing installed!!!!
StandupfortheUlstermen
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by man friday
the main problem is that we're a small unit, usually only 2 controllers, 1 tower only guy and the other valid in both positions and able to give the tower chap a break as required.
