Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

VMC descent and Visual Approach

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

VMC descent and Visual Approach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Aug 2006, 22:28
  #21 (permalink)  
DFC
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pierre,

I agree with your wording. If I remember corectly, that was the wording in Annex 11 some years ago.

---------------

ATCO 2,

I am trying to think of a reason for an IFR flight operating normally in controlled airspace would be requesting to descend visually (below that applicable minimum safe altitude) but not make a visual approach. Are they going to wave to Mamma and then climb back up or regain a safe level later when the level is lower?

Regards,

DFC
DFC is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2006, 08:21
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DFC

Barcelona on westerlies. Radar vectors to the ILS often leave you a shade high if ATC bring you in tight. High(ish) ground on base leg means ATC cannot offer a lower level unless you are visual with the surface. By reporting visual with the terrain beneath (and obviously maintaining safe separation from it), ATC can allow you an extra couple of feet descent, thereby allowing a nice high speed, CDA ILS to be flown.

G W-H
Giles Wembley-Hogg is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2006, 19:17
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: wherever I lay my headset
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gwh... no names, no pack-drill, but at a certain unit in the UK we used to routinely ask pilots if they were visual with the surface, and then would say "maintain your own terrain clearance, descend to.... ft"? We could probably get away with it because we were working in Class G (it might have even been before those classifications were introduced?)... but it helped get pilots in when weather was marginal IMC
Pierre Argh is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.