Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Mode C vs. RVSM status

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Mode C vs. RVSM status

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Mar 2006, 12:43
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Maastricht, NL
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mode C vs. RVSM status

Hi all,

I'm just wondering how is it treated at other ATC units if an a/c loses it's mode C - is it still considered as RVSM or not?
Strictly speaking it is not, but on the other hand it does not lose the altitude keeping ability, it's only an indication... How's it at you and what do you think?
cheers,
Jago
Jagohu is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2006, 19:42
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Swanwick
Age: 44
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey!

As far as i'm aware, if an aircraft loses it's Mode-C, we treat it as negative RVSM. Could be wrong though... usually am!
YourFriendlyATCO! is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2006, 09:56
  #3 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The European airspace documentation can be found here:

ECAC RVSM Library

In particular the MEL is included in TGL6 and the Flight Crew information pack.

The MEL is:

AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT

The minimum equipment list (MEL) fulfilling the MASPS consists of : (see JAA TGL6)

1.Two independent altitude measurement systems each equipped with:

            2.One SSR transponder with an altitude reporting system in use for altitude keeping.

            3. An altitude alerting system.

            4. An automatic altitude control system.
            Unfortunately the ATC Manual is not available on the site as it is undergoing a rewrite - so can't see what official guidance is given if a transponder fails.
            PPRuNe Radar is offline  
            Old 30th Mar 2006, 11:31
              #4 (permalink)  
             
            Join Date: Dec 2005
            Location: heart of europe
            Posts: 1
            Likes: 0
            Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
            Hi Vik,

            good to see that you haven't lost your habit of asking tricky questions as you did in ABI39

            greetings from ELLX

            PM
            eighteennine is offline  
            Old 30th Mar 2006, 22:32
              #5 (permalink)  
             
            Join Date: Jul 2001
            Location: On a different Island
            Age: 52
            Posts: 311
            Likes: 0
            Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
            From the Australian AIP...

            Failure of the Mode C-capable SSR Transponder. If the mode C-capable transponder fails, the pilot must notify ATC of the failure using the phraseology “NEGATIVE RVSM” (see GEN 3.4 Subsection 5.5 Item 2.p.)
            Blockla is offline  
            Old 31st Mar 2006, 00:23
              #6 (permalink)  
             
            Join Date: Feb 2002
            Location: Hongkers
            Posts: 470
            Likes: 0
            Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
            The significance of no Mode C precluding RVSM is not really related to the inability of ATC to see the aircraft's altitude on the radar - there is plenty of RVSM airspace outside radar coverage - but more to do with the ability to comply with TCAS II requirements which would require altitude encoding for resolution advisory.
            bekolblockage is offline  
            Old 31st Mar 2006, 05:38
              #7 (permalink)  
            Spitoon
            Guest
             
            Posts: n/a
            Originally Posted by Mike Jenvey
            There is a very vague answer in the Air Traffic Controllers FAQs - doesn't really say yes or no!
            Typical Eurocontrol/JAA wording!!! Of course you can allow a non-RVSM aircraft into RVSM airspace - it's just that you might want to use 5000ft vertical separation....

            Wouldn't it be nice if one day the people who write the rules took the trouble to make sure that they dotted the Is and crossed the Ts. But to do that I suppose you would need to work out all the answers before you dump it on the controllers.

            On the original question, although I don't do RVSM, it seems clear to me that no mode C = negative RVSM.
             
            Old 31st Mar 2006, 07:33
              #8 (permalink)  
            Thread Starter
             
            Join Date: Jun 2004
            Location: Maastricht, NL
            Posts: 101
            Likes: 0
            Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
            Typical Eurocontrol/JAA wording!!! Of course you can allow a non-RVSM aircraft into RVSM airspace - it's just that you might want to use 5000ft vertical separation....

            Well, they're only talking about the ICAO RVSM requirements (general I guess) and for Europe there's the D7030 for example, which clearly states that in case if an aircraft is non-RVSM and not state approved it cannot enter to the RVSM airspace.
            Jagohu is offline  
            Old 31st Mar 2006, 08:19
              #9 (permalink)  

            More than just an ATCO
             
            Join Date: Jul 1999
            Location: Up someone's nose
            Age: 75
            Posts: 1,768
            Likes: 0
            Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
            Jagohu, ask your TO. It'll give him/her something to look up.
            From memory; the requirements for RVSM are no longer met, so climb above/descend below RVSM airspace.
            Lon More is offline  

            Posting Rules
            You may not post new threads
            You may not post replies
            You may not post attachments
            You may not edit your posts

            BB code is On
            Smilies are On
            [IMG] code is On
            HTML code is Off
            Trackbacks are Off
            Pingbacks are Off
            Refbacks are Off



            Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

            Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.