Mode C vs. RVSM status
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Maastricht, NL
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mode C vs. RVSM status
Hi all,
I'm just wondering how is it treated at other ATC units if an a/c loses it's mode C - is it still considered as RVSM or not?
Strictly speaking it is not, but on the other hand it does not lose the altitude keeping ability, it's only an indication... How's it at you and what do you think?
cheers,
Jago
I'm just wondering how is it treated at other ATC units if an a/c loses it's mode C - is it still considered as RVSM or not?
Strictly speaking it is not, but on the other hand it does not lose the altitude keeping ability, it's only an indication... How's it at you and what do you think?
cheers,
Jago
The European airspace documentation can be found here:
ECAC RVSM Library
In particular the MEL is included in TGL6 and the Flight Crew information pack.
The MEL is:
Unfortunately the ATC Manual is not available on the site as it is undergoing a rewrite - so can't see what official guidance is given if a transponder fails.
ECAC RVSM Library
In particular the MEL is included in TGL6 and the Flight Crew information pack.
The MEL is:
AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT
The minimum equipment list (MEL) fulfilling the MASPS consists of : (see JAA TGL6)
1.Two independent altitude measurement systems each equipped with:
2.One SSR transponder with an altitude reporting system in use for altitude keeping.
3. An altitude alerting system.
4. An automatic altitude control system.
The minimum equipment list (MEL) fulfilling the MASPS consists of : (see JAA TGL6)
1.Two independent altitude measurement systems each equipped with:
2.One SSR transponder with an altitude reporting system in use for altitude keeping.
3. An altitude alerting system.
4. An automatic altitude control system.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: On a different Island
Age: 52
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the Australian AIP...
Failure of the Mode C-capable SSR Transponder. If the mode C-capable transponder fails, the pilot must notify ATC of the failure using the phraseology “NEGATIVE RVSM” (see GEN 3.4 Subsection 5.5 Item 2.p.)
Failure of the Mode C-capable SSR Transponder. If the mode C-capable transponder fails, the pilot must notify ATC of the failure using the phraseology “NEGATIVE RVSM” (see GEN 3.4 Subsection 5.5 Item 2.p.)
The significance of no Mode C precluding RVSM is not really related to the inability of ATC to see the aircraft's altitude on the radar - there is plenty of RVSM airspace outside radar coverage - but more to do with the ability to comply with TCAS II requirements which would require altitude encoding for resolution advisory.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Mike Jenvey
There is a very vague answer in the Air Traffic Controllers FAQs - doesn't really say yes or no!
Wouldn't it be nice if one day the people who write the rules took the trouble to make sure that they dotted the Is and crossed the Ts. But to do that I suppose you would need to work out all the answers before you dump it on the controllers.
On the original question, although I don't do RVSM, it seems clear to me that no mode C = negative RVSM.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Maastricht, NL
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Typical Eurocontrol/JAA wording!!! Of course you can allow a non-RVSM aircraft into RVSM airspace - it's just that you might want to use 5000ft vertical separation....
Well, they're only talking about the ICAO RVSM requirements (general I guess) and for Europe there's the D7030 for example, which clearly states that in case if an aircraft is non-RVSM and not state approved it cannot enter to the RVSM airspace.
Well, they're only talking about the ICAO RVSM requirements (general I guess) and for Europe there's the D7030 for example, which clearly states that in case if an aircraft is non-RVSM and not state approved it cannot enter to the RVSM airspace.
More than just an ATCO
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jagohu, ask your TO. It'll give him/her something to look up.
From memory; the requirements for RVSM are no longer met, so climb above/descend below RVSM airspace.
From memory; the requirements for RVSM are no longer met, so climb above/descend below RVSM airspace.