Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Couple of silly questions

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Couple of silly questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th March 2006 | 10:05
  #21 (permalink)  
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
Moderator
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 1997
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 3,231
Likes: 21
From: Europe
Any truth in the rumour that the new LHR Tower has been constructed from ivory ??
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Old 30th March 2006 | 11:56
  #22 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 7
From: UK
Originally Posted by keithl
Karen: I've always thought an airfield was military and an airport civilian. My reason for this is that when I was in the RAF both controllers and pilots used the abbreviation 'field.. Examples; "identified 30 miles north of the field..." or "field in sight". I know the official documents talk about "Military Aerodromes", but no-one would have used aerodrome, or airport when referring to a military airfield. I noticed the difference when I went civvie a few years ago.
Whilst I can see what you're getting at, I don't think you can entirely base any military/civil distinction between Airfield and Airport on the phraseology you quote. As I'm sure you know, the same phrases you quote are also regularly used in civvie ATC, and "field in sight" appears in CAP 413 as an example of both military and civil phraseology.
spekesoftly is offline  
Old 30th March 2006 | 12:22
  #23 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 33
From: LHR/EGLL
Radar, yes. Ivory worked very well at Stansted and Gatwick, and they like it.

We think it's unsafe and will decrease our capacity....
Gonzo is offline  
Old 30th March 2006 | 12:57
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 496
Likes: 1
From: Scotland
Speke: Yes, they weren't the best examples, but I was just "dashing off" a quick reply. I thought later it might have made the point better by comparing the mil "diversion airfield" with the civvy "alternate airport". I'm just recalling conversational usage rather than R/T. In conversation, (Caveats: In my time / In my part of the Air Force) no-one would have used "Aerodrome / Airport" in conversation. Only "Airfield".
keithl is offline  
Old 30th March 2006 | 13:59
  #25 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,924
Likes: 7
From: UK
keithl,

As another 'ex-mil', similar vintage, I entirely agree with your comment about 'conversational usage'.

(Mind you, my parents, both ex-WWII and now well into their 80s, still quaintly refer to my place of work as the 'drome !! )
spekesoftly is offline  
Old 31st March 2006 | 09:46
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Saffron Walden, UK
But surely Gonzo you are basically saying the same thing to Heathrow inbounds whereas Gatwick Directors (never mind Essex Radar!!) are giving more varied instructions to inbound a/c?
classicwings is offline  
Old 31st March 2006 | 11:17
  #27 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 33
From: LHR/EGLL
I'm talking about real ATC, that done from a control tower, not a supplement to TCAS done in front of a radar screen in a big bunker.....
Gonzo is offline  
Old 31st March 2006 | 11:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Saffron Walden, UK
Goodness, thats abit scathing towards radar control isnt it?! I suppose they have the advantage fatter pay cheques at the end of the month but they might have alittle difficulty in identifying what an aircraft looks like.....

Surely though if you have been at the Heathrow VCR prior to '93 before TC sucked up your radars then you would have had a radar rating!
classicwings is offline  
Old 31st March 2006 | 11:47
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: surrey
At airfields, such as Gatwick, an ATCO might speak to maybe 60-70 a/c in one hour.

At airports, such as Heathrow, an ATCO might speak to 120+ a/c an hour.
So dividing those numbers by the number of runways in use (and bearing in mind one controller per runway); You are admitting that Gatwick is at the very least, as busy as Heathrow
ukatco_535 is offline  
Old 31st March 2006 | 11:54
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Saffron Walden, UK
At airfields, such as Gatwick, an ATCO might speak to maybe 60-70 a/c in one hour.

At airports, such as Heathrow, an ATCO might speak to 120+ a/c an hour.

So dividing those numbers by the number of runways in use (and bearing in mind one controller per runway); You are admitting that Gatwick is at the very least, as busy as Heathrow

Certainly confirms the fact that Gatwick is the busiest single operation runway in the world.
classicwings is offline  
Old 31st March 2006 | 12:56
  #31 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 33
From: LHR/EGLL
I surely hope that they do not have fatter pay cheques!

Move Approach back at the tower, that's the way forward. Would sort out the LL Approach staffing problem!

You are admitting that Gatwick is at the very least, as busy as Heathrow
Not if you read my post.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 31st March 2006 | 13:28
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
From: uk
I say Gonzo,aren't you EGLL tower only types just glorified car park attendants.
At least you guys know how to say ''Clearded to Land''.
Ever validated a Radar rating working in Class A,D,F,G airspace?
There are people who still validate tower and approach radar,north of Watford.
throw a dyce is offline  
Old 31st March 2006 | 13:38
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Saffron Walden, UK
Ok Gonzo, well I dont actually work for NATS or Air Traffic in any sense (failed applicant twice! ) but i am aware that the NATS payscale is based more on your time in the job (should know as my old man has worked for NATS for ther past god knows how many eons) so I take that back about approach controllers being on 'fatter paycheques' Although you could argue that radar has 'different' sorts of challenges. I have seen both sides of the operation both at Heathrow VCR and with your colleagues at TC and I can see that ensuring necessary vortex wake spacings would be pretty tricky on radar but remembering the names of all the holding points at Heathrow from a visual control point of view would be a complete nightmare!
classicwings is offline  
Old 31st March 2006 | 13:53
  #34 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 33
From: LHR/EGLL
Finally, a bit of banter!

North of Watford...bit cold up there for us sophisticated southerners!

All those non-squawkers, non-radios.....no thanks, you can keep 'em!
Gonzo is offline  
Old 31st March 2006 | 13:57
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Saffron Walden, UK
Originally Posted by throw a dyce
I say Gonzo,aren't you EGLL tower only types just glorified car park attendants.
At least you guys know how to say ''Clearded to Land''.
Ever validated a Radar rating working in Class A,D,F,G airspace?
There are people who still validate tower and approach radar,north of Watford.
Yer like you probably fall into this category if you an ATCO and you dont work for NATS...... I think I would much prefer working for a Private organsation which is how it used to be in the good old days where you will atleast be able to obtain aerodrome and approach ratings rather than being sent like a robot to CATC in Bournemouth to and up working in a Air Traffic factory!
classicwings is offline  
Old 2nd April 2006 | 00:18
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,122
Likes: 0
From: uk
Classicwings.
There are quite a few Nats units were Tower and Approach are the norm.Bristol,Cardiff,Birmingham,Manchester,Belfast,Glasgow,E dinburgh,Aberdeen,and Gibraltar spring to mind.Don't know about Aberporth?
Everyone is paid much less than Heathrow,and bar one (Manch) less than Gatwick.However ATC wise it's much more interesting than the sausage machines in the South.
Gonzo,
You Southern softies should listen to a certain Billy Connolly when he says there is no such thing as bad weather,just the wrong kind of clothes.We do have SSR and radios North of Watford you know.Probably invented them
throw a dyce is offline  
Old 2nd April 2006 | 07:33
  #37 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 33
From: LHR/EGLL
Ah, but do you have colour TV?
Gonzo is offline  
Old 2nd April 2006 | 12:04
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
From: UK
An airport is a big airfield
An airfield is what you say is 'in sight' then you can see the runways, unless you are at an airport when you say "runway in sight"
An aerodrome is something Spitfires used to land on
funfly is offline  
Old 3rd April 2006 | 08:11
  #39 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,458
Likes: 368
From: Wildest Surrey
Thow a dyce - you missed out Farnborough and Southampton. Aberporth airfield is FISO but NATS still supply staff to Aberporth (Cardigan Bay) Range Control via (I think) Cardiff. These controllers also do range control in the Hebrides range.
chevvron is online now  
Old 4th April 2006 | 07:58
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Saffron Walden, UK
Originally Posted by throw a dyce
Classicwings.
There are quite a few Nats units were Tower and Approach are the norm.Bristol,Cardiff,Birmingham,Manchester,Belfast,Glasgow,E dinburgh,Aberdeen,and Gibraltar spring to mind.Don't know about Aberporth?
Everyone is paid much less than Heathrow,and bar one (Manch) less than Gatwick.However ATC wise it's much more interesting than the sausage machines in the South.
Gonzo,
You Southern softies should listen to a certain Billy Connolly when he says there is no such thing as bad weather,just the wrong kind of clothes.We do have SSR and radios North of Watford you know.Probably invented them
Point taken throw a dyce, I am aware of NATS units where tower and approach still exist but I think my bite was focused more towards current trainee cadets prospects of been able to get but aerodrome and approach ratings. Seems now you are streamed either on an approach or area course following your initial training on the course but from what I can gather after signing my life away on my initial declaration there is currently little chance of being sent to anywhere else other than Swanwick!::
classicwings is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.