Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Determining Radar Vectoring Area

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Determining Radar Vectoring Area

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Feb 2006, 12:21
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Determining Radar Vectoring Area

Many airports have a radar vectoring area (RVA) published in the AIP, with miimum safe altitudes which are lower than the MSA.

Who determines the RVA (the CAA?) , and what rules do they apply when setting the lower safe altitudes?

Many thanks for any help
GB
GroundBound is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 12:40
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,832
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
CAP 709 'Radar Vectoring Areas in UK Airspace'
chevvron is online now  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 12:40
  #3 (permalink)  
niknak
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The CAA approve the RVA after consultation with the airport authority.

Without looking in the books, it's my understanding that the lower altitudes within a RVA are set in accordance with the highest obstacle in the sector, the premise being that providing radar contact with the aircraft is maintained the atco knows it's clear of the relavant obstacle.
If the atco is operating without radar (procedurally), the aircraft wouldn't be allowed to descend beneath the MSA, or if operating with radar it already has descended and subsequently radar contact is lost, it must climb to at least the MSA or an intermediate level above the MSA.

Hope that makes some sense.
niknak is offline  
Old 27th Feb 2006, 13:13
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Belgium
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks

Chevvron Cheers mate - exactly what I was looking for.
Niknak Thanks for the comfirmation - its what I expected, but its nice to hear it from someone else.
GB
P.S. its quicker on pPrune than on google !
GroundBound is offline  
Old 6th Mar 2006, 13:21
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,832
Received 98 Likes on 71 Posts
Just had UK AIC No 20/2006. It says that in response to an ICAO requirement, the chart is to be redesigned to ICAO specs and re-named Radar Minimum Altitude Chart. There's a slight difference to the present RVA chart, but broadly speaking, the present UK charts are similar, and will be replaced over a period of time rather than immediately.
The purpose of the ICAO standard is 'to provide information to allow flight crews to monitor and cross check altitudes assigned whilst receiving vectoring instructions'.
I've just submitted an update for my airfield, so hopefully I'll get the revised chart!!
chevvron is online now  
Old 7th Mar 2006, 21:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A oneworld lounge near you
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Survey

And the obstacle and terrain surveys have to be in accordance with CAP 232 from the ground. And if you wish to avoid getting caught by the lawyers, the obstacle flight check should be valid as well.

Directorate of Airspace Policy are the service provider, regulator and award the contract for AIP publication of the information as the representative of the State.

I usually find that there is not enough information on the UK charts to allow crews to know when they are crossing from one line to another, execept around the final approach and DME. Unless you fly with those nasty glass cockpit display things
discountinvestigator is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.