NATS Course Comparison
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NATS Course Comparison
After hearing/reading so much about how tough the NATS ATC course is, I was wondering how it compares (i.e. workload, technical learning, research etc) to a BSc(hons). Also what format do the assessments take, essays, multiple choice, practicals etc. I'm in the process of applying now and just curious as to the nature of the course. Thanks for your thoughts
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Firstly, good luck with the application. It's a great job, don't let the odd moan on these pages put you off....
I graduated with a BEng(Hons) about two years before starting at CATC. For me, the two courses were very different indeed. Mechanical engineering never held too much of an interest for me so it was all new stuff, loads of maths, and very technical stuff indeed. The ATC course is actually not as technical as you'd possibly expect - most of the learning is geared towards practical stuff you'll use and although I'd never studied Meterology or Air Law, for example, the course length means there just isn't time to go into terribly complex detail. I'd always been interested in aviation, so stuff like aircraft recognition was an absolute gift!! Don't get me wrong, there's lots of stuff to learn - but it generally seemed the case that if you studied reasonably hard, the theoretical assessments weren't a problem. If you already have some interest and knowledge of aviation matters then you're already at an advantage.
A more recent person can probably give you an up-to-date summary of the assessment process, which has changed a bit since I was there.
There are lots of simulator runs though, and it's the practical side that catches most people out. You can study 24/7 and yet in the heat of the simulated moment, it's easy to screw up just enough to fail! (as in real life I suppose....).
Other differences from a degree course are the course length (10 months or so vs. 3 years); you'll get your a$$ kicked very rapidly if you do the student thing of sleeping in most mornings; and if you pass the course you're guaranteed (subject to validating at your posted unit) a job which also happens to pay lots!
I graduated with a BEng(Hons) about two years before starting at CATC. For me, the two courses were very different indeed. Mechanical engineering never held too much of an interest for me so it was all new stuff, loads of maths, and very technical stuff indeed. The ATC course is actually not as technical as you'd possibly expect - most of the learning is geared towards practical stuff you'll use and although I'd never studied Meterology or Air Law, for example, the course length means there just isn't time to go into terribly complex detail. I'd always been interested in aviation, so stuff like aircraft recognition was an absolute gift!! Don't get me wrong, there's lots of stuff to learn - but it generally seemed the case that if you studied reasonably hard, the theoretical assessments weren't a problem. If you already have some interest and knowledge of aviation matters then you're already at an advantage.
A more recent person can probably give you an up-to-date summary of the assessment process, which has changed a bit since I was there.
There are lots of simulator runs though, and it's the practical side that catches most people out. You can study 24/7 and yet in the heat of the simulated moment, it's easy to screw up just enough to fail! (as in real life I suppose....).
Other differences from a degree course are the course length (10 months or so vs. 3 years); you'll get your a$$ kicked very rapidly if you do the student thing of sleeping in most mornings; and if you pass the course you're guaranteed (subject to validating at your posted unit) a job which also happens to pay lots!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Other differences from a degree course are the course length (10 months or so vs. 3 years); you'll get your a$$ kicked very rapidly if you do the student thing of sleeping in most mornings; and if you pass the course you're guaranteed (subject to validating at your posted unit) a job which also happens to pay lots!
Last edited by 5milesbaby; 8th Feb 2006 at 23:19.
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: By the Sea-side
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The two barely compare at all.
There is very little, if any, essay or report writing, and no critical examination of the studies of others. The truth is the truth and ATC Training just teaches it to you. That's the brains and book bit, which compares more with secondary school than Uni.
The practical training is more like art school. You have the aptitude, they take that aptitude and build on it using practical exercises with a skilled practitioner. He/she trains you by guiding and monitoring your every move and thought, building your skills up until you can produce the level of competence that will allow you to monitor your own ability and automatically correct and amend your actions to produce a masterpiece - every day.
That's why you don't just have to be clever, you also need that "other" quality, that if someone could actually define it, would make them a very rich person right now. Sounds tough. It is, but everyone seems to enjoy doing it which makes it easier.
Good luck.
DwB
There is very little, if any, essay or report writing, and no critical examination of the studies of others. The truth is the truth and ATC Training just teaches it to you. That's the brains and book bit, which compares more with secondary school than Uni.
The practical training is more like art school. You have the aptitude, they take that aptitude and build on it using practical exercises with a skilled practitioner. He/she trains you by guiding and monitoring your every move and thought, building your skills up until you can produce the level of competence that will allow you to monitor your own ability and automatically correct and amend your actions to produce a masterpiece - every day.
That's why you don't just have to be clever, you also need that "other" quality, that if someone could actually define it, would make them a very rich person right now. Sounds tough. It is, but everyone seems to enjoy doing it which makes it easier.
Good luck.
DwB
I say there boy
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Theory-wise, college is more like doing a single A-Level on ATC theory.
In the application of said theory, and in the teaching and testing of pure practical skills in the simulator, there is nothing harder that I've experienced and I have three engineering degrees from a very posh UK uni and a CPL/IR.
In the application of said theory, and in the teaching and testing of pure practical skills in the simulator, there is nothing harder that I've experienced and I have three engineering degrees from a very posh UK uni and a CPL/IR.