Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

useage of 'HEAVY'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Nov 2005, 04:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at a bus stop !
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
useage of 'HEAVY'

Was just wondering if someone could clarify for me whether it is a requirement to use the suffix "HEAVY" if your a/c falls into that category. On frequency I hear some carriers using it and some not - is it required?
a_320busdriver is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2005, 05:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Abu Dhab's
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it not only used in the US, and Canada? Only pilots I have heard using it.....
TMAguide is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2005, 07:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Vilha Abrao
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To my knowledge it's required also in europe at initial call.
catchup is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2005, 08:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As of today (24 Nov) it's required in Australia also. It comes from the ICAO 4444.
Green on, Go! is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2005, 09:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LONDON
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
use of heavy

Some do; some don't - certainly at LHR. Seems that US & Canada flights use it all the time when appropriate; DLH seem to as well - others not necessarily.

MM
myrtleman is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2005, 09:15
  #6 (permalink)  

Sub Judice Angel Lovegod
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May I expand the question to the use of the word "Helicopter"?
Timothy is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2005, 09:45
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: btw SAMAR and TOSPA
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FromICAO Doc 4444

4.9.2 Indication of heavy wake turbulence category
For aircraft in the heavy wake turbulence category the word
“Heavy” shall be included immediately after the aircraft call
sign in the initial radiotelephony contact between such aircraft
and ATS units.
threemiles is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2005, 19:44
  #8 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
From the UK's CAP 413 - Chapt 2 para 1.8.2 - on aircraft callsigns "The name of either the aircraft manufacturer, or name of aircraft model, or name of the aircraft category (e.g. helicopter or gyrocopter) may be used as a prefix to the callsign.".

A couple of paras later it says "Aircraft in the heavy wake vortex category shall include the word ‘HEAVY’ immediately after the aircraft callsign in the initial call to each ATSU."

It's worth pointing out that the UK uses non-ICAO wake vortex categories too but offhand I can't remember whether heavies are different.
 
Old 24th Nov 2005, 23:46
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canberra Australia
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where is the division between light and heavy?

When does a Lighty become a Heavy and can a Heavy default to a Lighty with fuel useage?

This is a very weighty question!
Milt is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2005, 01:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel Useage irrelevant.

Based on MTOW.

Medium 7000kg+

Heavy 136000kg+

(Super Heavy 200000kg+ - for HVY fol HVY consideration)
Uncommon Sense is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2005, 08:07
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: wherever I lay my headset
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Timothy... your question about the callsign prefix "helicopter" seems to have been ignored... and I'd add "Micro-light" to that list? "Heavy" I can understand, but is there a requirement for these other pre-fixes?
Pierre Argh is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2005, 09:27
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Hongkers
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re 757 : Depends whether its in front of a medium or behind a heavy.

Re the original thread: whole thing is a crock, with any decent RDPS/FDPS having the weight cat in the label and on the paper/electronic strip. More verbosity.
bekolblockage is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2005, 08:15
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: https://t.me/pump_upp
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SASKATOON9999

For example, you may find B752/3 is heavy in Austria. That was on request from LOWW APP, after an incident they had with it. So, now on our radar label (Beograd ACC) we have combination of both M and H for B752/3, depending where it's coming from (actually, that's how we find out about Austrians). As far as I was told, the heaviest version of B757 reaches 113.000 kg, so, according to that, it's medium, but due wake it creates, some ATCs are considering it as H.
jovica is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2005, 12:17
  #14 (permalink)  
Tweety
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
IN my book yes as this is a heads up for the controller.
 
Old 27th Nov 2005, 12:22
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To borrow a quaint English phrase - what a load of bollocks.

May I suggest this only snuck in to the lexicon to start with because of an outdated US ATC system patched together.

Even a flight strip - electronic or paper has a bloody H on it, or the ACFT type.

Sorry - just my view. But Bollocks nonetheless.
Uncommon Sense is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2005, 15:06
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth ARTCC ZFW
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Uncommon;

Sir, until you KNOW what you are talking about and do some research, please stop your rude insinuations. The rule came about in the US due to LAWYERS and civil litigation. We are only supposed to use the word Heavy when giving traffic and don't use it for normal transmissions in the US enroute system. Now the pilots seem to like to use it, it shows status and pay level <BG>...

regards

Scott
Scott Voigt is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2005, 17:29
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
As a pilot I like it, helps to keep the SA up. Now I know I don't have the big picture before Scott points it out, but I don't care about your big picture. I care about what affects me. If I can gleen I'm following a heavy in the LA haze where everything looks small by using some awareness to his calls using the heavy in the callsign then I'm better off.

Go ahead Scott, get your dander up that I might have a limited idea of what's around me.
West Coast is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.