Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Manchester last night

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Manchester last night

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Nov 2005, 12:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ישראל
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manchester last night

Take it controllers were finding it interesting in passing radar headings as there was a strong SW wind blowing last night.

The question is, as pilots, why dont controllers ask us more often what the upper winds are as opposed to us having to report it voluntarily in the hope of minimising frequent heading/track adjustments?
No_Speed_Restriction is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2005, 14:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: USA
Age: 66
Posts: 2,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do....and over the past few days(when it has been blowing a hooligan) I have done it more and more. Generally however the radar controller can judge how the wind is interfering with his (normally ) extremely expeditious vectors!!
eastern wiseguy is offline  
Old 12th Nov 2005, 19:34
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't speak for Manch, but as eastern says, we generally can work out the wind fairly accurately given the difference between your airspeed and our groundspeed display, and your allocated radar heading and your displayed track. As long as the wind affects most planes in a similar way it's not too bad. As long as you remember which ones have to turn onto the ILS early.....!

When the crosswind is strong at altitude but drops away significantly at lower levels, one heading will obviously result in a long curved track. In that case you might have to take several 'nibbling' heading adjustments. We know you can fly a track instead...but then the CAA considers you to be on your own navigation and therefore not technically radar separated from adjacent traffic. Doubtless this will change one day but we're stuck with headings for the moment.
NudgingSteel is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2005, 16:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: 30 West
Age: 65
Posts: 926
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bring back more Fam Flights !
javelin is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2005, 19:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: on the way to sea
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a policy - better ask than correct later. I have no problem asking pilots about wind and other relevant info.
kontrolor is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2005, 07:10
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ישראל
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wish more controllers were like you then.


maybe its a pride thing

only joking
No_Speed_Restriction is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2005, 10:59
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Southampton
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you are put on a heading to separate from other traffic that heading has to be monitored by the controller to ensure that it is working. If I am busy (or in this case high winds give me a greater level of uncertainty about my headings) I will give an initial heading that will give me far greater lateral separation than I require, in effect, building in a larger component of "room for error". As the situation develops (and if the traffic allows) I can tighten the headings up, reducing the lateral separation. Conversely, if I were quiet, I’d pass a heading that would give me the minimum 5 miles in the knowledge that I have the time to keep a close eye on both aircraft.

Some, more advanced, ATC units have electronic tools for assessing and monitoring headings.
Arkady is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2005, 14:34
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: the Milky Way
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We know you can fly a track instead
Not quite everyone I'm afraid. We don't all have such advanced technology at our disposal.
ElNino is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2005, 22:38
  #9 (permalink)  
Tweety
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
re the earlier comment re both acft on headings,

if the acft are say 6-7 mile apart at same level then the heading for one should be good forthe otherand maintain separation as the winds applying to onewill be the same for the other. Its only when vecotoring for spacing with acft on different descent or climb profiles that the different winds will cause an issue especially where there is a large sheer in a few thousand feet
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.