Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Two quick questions for you ATCO's.

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Two quick questions for you ATCO's.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th September 2005 | 14:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Heathrow
Two quick questions for you ATCO's.

After some clarification on a couple of questions, thanks in advance.

1.which of the following is correct RT?

a. climb to 4000 feet, QNH 1015
b. descend to altitude 4000f eet, QNH 999
c. climb to flight level 230.

2. under a RA sevice, FL90 am i right in thinking that the max speed is 250kts?

3. ( for you LHR chaps), is N1 and N3 Rw27L considered NOT to be an intersection for wake seperation purposes?

4. finally, A319 following B757 into LHR, nice day, what is the minimum spacing required on approach?

Thanks.
spoilers yellow is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 14:51
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 33
From: LHR/EGLL
1 - b (if you add the word 'millibars' on the end!)

2 - I'll leave that to the experts!

3 - N3 is not considered a vortex intersection. ie. if you depart from N3 in a medium, you can go 2 minutes behind a heavy who departed from the full length. (same with N8 and N10 on 09R)

4 - A319 (lower medium) requires 4 miles behind a B757 (upper medium).
Gonzo is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 14:57
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Heathrow
Thanks very much for the quick reply, appreciate that.
spoilers yellow is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 14:59
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 353
Likes: 4
From: Around
1. In the UK, none are correct. They should be:

a) Climb to altitude 4000 feet, QNH 1015.
b) Descend to altitude 4000 feet, QNH 999 millibars.
c) Climb flight level 230. (No 'to')

2. The rules of the air require aircraft to observe a speed limit of 250kt IAS below FL100.

The limit does not apply to:

a) Flights in class A and B airspace.
b) IFR in class C
c) Flights in class C & D when authorised by ATC.
d) Test flights iaw specified conditions
e) Flying displays authorised by CAA
f) A/c subject to written permission from CAA
g) A/c not subject to ANO (eg. military)

So, in your example, the limit is applicable.


3 & 4 left for those in the know.


Edit: Beaten to it!
rodan is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 15:02
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 476
Likes: 2
From: Hongkers
Millibars? Is it not hectopascals now?
bekolblockage is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 15:03
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 353
Likes: 4
From: Around
In ICAO-land, maybe.

Here in the UK we still use milky-bars.
rodan is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 15:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 476
Likes: 2
From: Hongkers
Oh I forgot. Pascal was French.
bekolblockage is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 15:21
  #8 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,174
Likes: 5
From: South of England
"None IS correct" - "none" is singular.

(Ducks to avoid inevitable incoming from anti-grammar police)
2 sheds is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 15:42
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Hate to differ but in Class D/E airspace below FL100 the speed limit of 250kts is manditory there is no ATC disgression, (unless your military of course )
ifleeplanes is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 15:44
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: wherever I lay my headset
Thinks, what is the plural of none then... nuns?
Pierre Argh is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 15:56
  #11 (permalink)  
I'm Just A Lawnmower
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Over the hills and faraway
Oh I forgot. Pascal was French
As opposed to Millie Barr, the well known Scottish meteorologist.
BALIX is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 16:09
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 353
Likes: 4
From: Around
Hate to differ but in Class D/E airspace below FL100 the speed limit of 250kts is manditory there is no ATC disgression
Assuming we are talking about the UK here, (the reference to 'RA service' and questions about EGLL ops imply a UK perspective), then you are incorrect.

In the UK, the restriction may be lifted in Class D at the discretion of ATC. My answer was drawn from the UK Manual of Air Traffic Services.


"None IS correct" - "none" is singular.
Quite right, I hang my head.
rodan is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 17:26
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
From: Near Stalyvegas
(unless your military of course )......errrrm should that be
"unless you're military, of course"?
watp,iktch
chiglet is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 18:49
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
From: Europe
OK Rodan Im sorry, the CAA document I took it from must be wrong then. It seemed logical to me since in D only separation provided is between IFR/IFR.
ifleeplanes is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 18:56
  #15 (permalink)  

The Original Party Animal
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Around the corner
Climb to altitude 4000 feet
Why do you have to add "altitude"in the UK?
What could "4000 ft" be mistaken for?

Bit like a black crow or a wooden tree.
Spuds McKenzie is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 19:02
  #16 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,432
Likes: 33
From: LHR/EGLL
Climb to four thousand feet.

Climb two four thousand feet.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 19:04
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: surrey
Spuds...

Here at TC, we quite often get our bretheren from across the pond replying to a call of climb FL130 with "climb 0ne three thousand"... etc etc

if you were to say "climb to 4000 feet"; would they maybe take that as clearance to climb to FL240??

I know it should be obvious, but when you normally fly in a country with a transition altitude 2 or 3 times higher than in the UK, I suppose it can be confusing. (Can't believe I typed something that could infer a defence of the Yankee pilots!!)

Beaten to the punch by Gonzo....
ukatco_535 is offline  
Old 20th September 2005 | 19:08
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: wherever I lay my headset
... climb to (height) 4000ft...

UK Military ATS Units predominatly pass instructions on QFE (although currently standard phraseology does NOT allow for the use of either height or altitude... IMHO wrongly?)
Pierre Argh is offline  
Old 30th September 2005 | 09:55
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: uk
Spuds mckenzie, I hope you are not a controller!!! What could altitude be confused with?? height perhaps?? some a/c operators still use qfe.
stag1 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.