Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Light or commercial for preference?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Light or commercial for preference?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th September 2005 | 14:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Recidivist
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
From: Essex, UK
Light or commercial for preference?

Got to admit, I was impressed by the atco on Southend Approach this morning.

There were about two dozen actives and he was handling it all with efficiency and good humour. Best bit was, some of the traffic was on the ground as he was taking the tower traffic too.

Made me wonder whether atcos would prefer to handle mainly light aircraft (as in this case), with the usual sprinkling of 'learners', or whether all commercial traffic would be the area of choice?
frostbite is offline  
Old 17th September 2005 | 15:21
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
From: Poland
No offence, but I'd rather work with commerical traffic.
Light aircraft, especially training ones require much more attention and are sometimes completely unpredictible.
With IFR airliners one can expect no surprises. Everyone with TWR experience will tell you that.
Frunobulax is offline  
Old 17th September 2005 | 16:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: UK
Commercial traffic in class A, no contest

I also have a wish list:

Climb and descent rates in excess of 4000 fpm at any time or level.

Any other additions?
Carbide Finger is offline  
Old 17th September 2005 | 18:44
  #4 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,919
Likes: 0
From: This is the internet FFS.........
A mix of commercial and training flights (both VFR and IFR) can sure make life interesting, especially when sequencing them all in together. Although to echo Fruno. there is always the slight element of uncertainty as to what they are going to do.
Jerricho is offline  
Old 17th September 2005 | 21:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: UK
I appreciate not all GA pilots are as good as they should be but then some who fly the CAT have a problem occasionally, it is very rare I know; but does not handling the odd GA flight add a little to the otherwise (possible?) routine of your day?
WorkingHard is offline  
Old 17th September 2005 | 22:24
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Absolutely! Few things are more satisfying (jobwise that is, before my wife complains....) than being able to integrate a wide range of aircraft, from heavy commercial traffic through military fast jets, to light aircraft and even the odd hot air balloon. The main problem comes with doing all the above with minimal delays for everyone. Airline crews will complain if they perceive that they're being delayed by a VFR recreational or training flight, but PPLs paying £100 per hour won't be chuffed at watching airliner after airliner departing ahead of them at busy airports. Get it right and it's great. (So I'm told....)

I'd take issue with the suggestion that you expect no surprises from IFR....I'd say most ATCOs have been very surprised at least once by a big aeroplane doing something bizarre!
NudgingSteel is offline  
Old 18th September 2005 | 12:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Manchester
Right at the end of my flying training (post-CPL) we had the opportunity to fly IFR from Bournemouth to Newcastle in a BE76 Duchess. Think the level was roughly FL70/80, routeing up towards CPT - HON - POL or similar. I remember thinking, the airspace was very busy and wondered was our small craft a hinderance or a novelty to ATC??

My point being, are those bottom levels never used normally so did it provide something different for you guys to do, break up the normal routine, or were we a problem in that we were buzzing along at 140kts and in everyone else's way?

Any thoughts appreciated!!
gliding777 is offline  
Old 18th September 2005 | 17:33
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Recidivist
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,240
Likes: 0
From: Essex, UK
As a sort of follow-up, the same atco this morning turned a light aircraft away.

He called in, very distorted, and, after about three attempts the atco managed to make out his registration. He responded by asking why the radio had not been fixed after previous reports.

Not being satisfied with the response (whatever it was, I couldn't make it out), he suggested/instructed the pilot to return to his home field.

Don't blame him - he'd have ended up communicating by semaphore!
frostbite is offline  
Old 19th September 2005 | 07:31
  #9 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 712
Likes: 17
From: SE England
Light aircraft, GA and warbirds are more fun (partly because anything can happen), BUT heavy commercial is where the money is so that's where Mrs Dare sends me to work.

gliding777, at FL70 over CPT you were significantly more than a novelty. Everything has to climb and descend through your level when you seem to be hovering there for ever (140 kt doesn't seem very fast on radar) and when you are doing nothing more productive than going to NCL because its there it could seem a bit tedious for many controllers. They'll handle you without complaint all the same though and give you the same level of service as those 747s paying the wages, so you'll never know that you are a pain in the proverbial.
Dan Dare is offline  
Old 19th September 2005 | 11:42
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: frozen norff
Flypasts by warbirds are the cherry for me , otherwise if the pilot requests a service which I can provide, light/commercial/military/special tasks etc. then there's no preference.

Calibrator, anyone?
JustaFew is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.