Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Crossing multiple FIRs

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Crossing multiple FIRs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jul 2005, 18:22
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Crossing multiple FIRs

Guys, sorry to drop this on your forum, but I figure you will know the answers ...

I'm taking a trip in a few days, and the journey will be broken into two legs : UK - Germany, and Germany - Czech Republic. The whole trip will be VFR (wx permitting ... fingers crossed!)

The first leg will have me crossing several FIR boundaries. On the flight plan, how do I deal with this ? I'm referring to the section 18 part where you have to show estimate for time to an FIR boundary (not that I can remember the syntax right now!). Do I just put in multiple estimates ?

Thanks for any help,

FF
FullyFlapped is offline  
Old 23rd Jul 2005, 18:33
  #2 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try this Page 8, 'EET/' and see if that explains it.
BOAC is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2005, 09:22
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BOAC,

Thanks for that, but I'm not sure it does ...

If I'm crossing FIRs AAAA and BBBB, which of these do I use in section 18 ?

EET/AAAA0100 EET/BBBB0200

or

EET/AAAA0100BBBB0200

??

Thanks for your help !

FF
FullyFlapped is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2005, 09:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FF

Your first example - put them in individually
Chilli Monster is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2005, 20:28
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Chilli !

FF
FullyFlapped is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2005, 20:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: EGTT/FAB/LGW/BOH/FAB/LGW
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would put EET/AAAA0001 BBBB0022 CCCC0044

That is generally how it is put in most FPL's I've seen.
SilentHandover is offline  
Old 24th Jul 2005, 21:11
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think it's crucial either way so long as the data is easily identifiable. I was taught (many years ago) to use one style. As you say, it's often shown in the other. Either way so long as its understandable that's the main criteria - most VFR plans being read "manually" as opposed to being subject to any form of Automatic Data Processing.
Chilli Monster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.