Vortex separation on departure
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Vortex separation on departure
Excuse me for this trivial question but I've increasing doubts about my answer to that one...
Let's take an exemple: when the preceding aircraft is a Heavy/ Medium and the departing aircraft ( from the same point on the runway) is a Light, a 2 min separation is required.
When dou you actually start the stopwatch: as soon as the preceding a/c rolls or lifts off the ground?
Thanks in advance.
Let's take an exemple: when the preceding aircraft is a Heavy/ Medium and the departing aircraft ( from the same point on the runway) is a Light, a 2 min separation is required.
When dou you actually start the stopwatch: as soon as the preceding a/c rolls or lifts off the ground?
Thanks in advance.
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OK (it's okay)
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
U. S.
In the U.S., the 7110.65, 3-9-6. f. states:
Separate IFR/VFR aircraft taking off behind a heavy jet/B757 departure by
2 minutes, when departing:
NOTE-
Takeoff clearance to the following aircraft should not be issued until 2 minutes after the heavy jet/B757 begins takeoff roll.
---
ATC Chat
Separate IFR/VFR aircraft taking off behind a heavy jet/B757 departure by
2 minutes, when departing:
NOTE-
Takeoff clearance to the following aircraft should not be issued until 2 minutes after the heavy jet/B757 begins takeoff roll.
---
ATC Chat
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South East
Age: 56
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Basically as soon as the nose wheel lifts, the aircraft is producing lift and therefore those lovely vortices (is this a sucking eggs moment?)... so yep, the moment the front wheel lifts.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Australia similar to UK, the leading aircraft becoming airborne is the critical point, not when it started the take off roll. Simply put, assuming a 30 sec roll, take off clearance might be given 90 secs after the lead aircraft became airborne. In fact that will give a nice buffer depending on how quick the crew are to react.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Canada
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In Canada, we use radar separation if both depart from the same point. Light behind heavy/B757 = 6 mile.
Med behind Hvy = 5
Lgt behind Med = 4
If lighter a/c departs from intersection then we use 3 min.
Med behind Hvy = 5
Lgt behind Med = 4
If lighter a/c departs from intersection then we use 3 min.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
apache43,
Just a quick question, you're aiming to get the appropriate number of miles separation when no.2 pops up on radar, right? To get the medium behind a heavy 5 miles gap, at which point do you clear the medium for take off?
Just a quick question, you're aiming to get the appropriate number of miles separation when no.2 pops up on radar, right? To get the medium behind a heavy 5 miles gap, at which point do you clear the medium for take off?
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South East
Age: 56
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gonzo not quite sure what you are trying establish? Departure seperations are different from vortex. If an aircraft departs from the same point in your scenario, then 2 mins minimum. Different points 3 minutes minimum.
Once you have accounted for vortex, the departure clearence will then separate.
I.e 45 degree split after departure, the following aircraft can depart after 1 min. BUT, vortex seperation is greater, therefore that has to be taken into account.... Climb rates, IAS and routings all taken into account.
As you can see I am awful at explaining, so will never instruct.
plus not quite sure of your question............ Where's the pub?
Once you have accounted for vortex, the departure clearence will then separate.
I.e 45 degree split after departure, the following aircraft can depart after 1 min. BUT, vortex seperation is greater, therefore that has to be taken into account.... Climb rates, IAS and routings all taken into account.
As you can see I am awful at explaining, so will never instruct.
plus not quite sure of your question............ Where's the pub?
Guest
Posts: n/a
It sounds like apache is using a sort of hybrid departure/vortex separation.
I would ask the question what happens if, when the second departure pops up on radar, you haven't got the rquisite space between the aircraft?
And, as I think about it some more, what assurance do you have that there is enough space between the aircraft if it takes a good few secs for the aircraft to appear on radar, say if the head is a way away?
I would ask the question what happens if, when the second departure pops up on radar, you haven't got the rquisite space between the aircraft?
And, as I think about it some more, what assurance do you have that there is enough space between the aircraft if it takes a good few secs for the aircraft to appear on radar, say if the head is a way away?
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ausatco, thanks. What happens if you don't achieve the required vortex spacing (ie. a 737 pops up 4 miles behind a 747)?
Barnaby, I do realise the difference between departure route separations and vortex separations (at least I think I do! ). Apache43 made the point that he/she uses distance for vortex separations on departure, whereas we use time (the two or three minutes you mentioned).
Barnaby, I do realise the difference between departure route separations and vortex separations (at least I think I do!
). Apache43 made the point that he/she uses distance for vortex separations on departure, whereas we use time (the two or three minutes you mentioned).
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gonzo,
Firstly, just to clarify, we use both time and distance for wake turbulence separation. For example, MATS might specify 2 minutes or 5 miles. We are permitted to use whichever occurs first.
As I said for your distance question, we judge it so that when they're both airborne the distance standard is met. With a time standard, we judge it from rotate to rotate.
In Australia, wake turbulence spacing is a separation standard. If we get it wrong it's a breakdown of separation. As recovery action we have to issue traffic information and issue a "Caution, wake turbulence" to the following aircraft. The violation is an automatic report and the controller would usually be stood down.
AA
Firstly, just to clarify, we use both time and distance for wake turbulence separation. For example, MATS might specify 2 minutes or 5 miles. We are permitted to use whichever occurs first.
As I said for your distance question, we judge it so that when they're both airborne the distance standard is met. With a time standard, we judge it from rotate to rotate.
In Australia, wake turbulence spacing is a separation standard. If we get it wrong it's a breakdown of separation. As recovery action we have to issue traffic information and issue a "Caution, wake turbulence" to the following aircraft. The violation is an automatic report and the controller would usually be stood down.
AA
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<<What happens if you don't achieve the required vortex spacing (ie. a 737 pops up 4 miles behind a 747)?>>
When I worked Heathrow Tower I used to time it from start of roll, with slight adjustment for length of roll, and only provided time separation. I thought Tower controllers were only required to provide time separation and not distance.....
When I worked Heathrow Tower I used to time it from start of roll, with slight adjustment for length of roll, and only provided time separation. I thought Tower controllers were only required to provide time separation and not distance.....
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: South East
Age: 56
Posts: 614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An ADC only controller, you correctly state, only provides timed seperation for vortex. I also to tend judge the take off roll time to ensure maximum expedition. Usually I have to say, I am a couple of seconds over the required minima. Which as I am sure someone will point out, is better than being under. 
Never did get to the pub!
Never did get to the pub!
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Toronto
Age: 57
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you're aiming to get the appropriate number of miles separation when no.2 pops up on radar, right? To get the medium behind a heavy 5 miles gap, at which point do you clear the medium for take off?
what assurance do you have that there is enough space between the aircraft if it takes a good few secs for the aircraft to appear on radar, say if the head is a way away?
What happens if you don't achieve the required vortex spacing (ie. a 737 pops up 4 miles behind a 747)?
I thought Tower controllers were only required to provide time separation and not distance.....
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for your reply, cossack, that's more or less what I had thought.
As you say, many countries use distance instead of time to separate departures, in vortex as well as route separations. And for those saying that we don't do that in the UK, I can separate departures by five miles rather than the dictated two minutes if the departures are on converging tracks, by using my ATM.
As you say, many countries use distance instead of time to separate departures, in vortex as well as route separations. And for those saying that we don't do that in the UK, I can separate departures by five miles rather than the dictated two minutes if the departures are on converging tracks, by using my ATM.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ICAO allows controllers (Tower or other wise) to use both time or distance (measured by radar) standard for wake turbulance separation from same departure point. Time only allowed for intermediate departure. Whether your ANSP allows Towers to use radar depends on equipment and training. In UK I think you have a lot of distance to run type of Tower displays. Australia and I think US and Canada have fully functional TARs and are allowed to use them.