"The world's safest ATC system"
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: OK (it's okay)
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The world's safest ATC system"
Does anyone dispute the FAA claim the the United States has the safest ATC system in the world?
Does anyone know by what safety standards ATC systems are rated? For example, is it ATC-caused accidents/seat mile, or what?
---
ATC 24/7
Does anyone know by what safety standards ATC systems are rated? For example, is it ATC-caused accidents/seat mile, or what?
---
ATC 24/7
Ohcirrej
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not having a go at you Rich, but statements like that are just non-operational management types massaging their prostates with their heads.
The three ATS providers I have worked for all have used words to the effect of "world leaders in ATC" somewhere in their mission statement (another great buzz word
). Each system has certain procedures/systems that raise eyebrows of those from elsewhere (for example, the use of "Contact departure on 119.9 when airborne, clear for take off........" and the different wake turbulence categories used in the UK).
To actually state "the safest system" is a very bold statement. Personally, I see it as willy waving.
The three ATS providers I have worked for all have used words to the effect of "world leaders in ATC" somewhere in their mission statement (another great buzz word
). Each system has certain procedures/systems that raise eyebrows of those from elsewhere (for example, the use of "Contact departure on 119.9 when airborne, clear for take off........" and the different wake turbulence categories used in the UK).To actually state "the safest system" is a very bold statement. Personally, I see it as willy waving.
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and the different wake turbulence categories used in the UK
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: S coast
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
now now Gonzo
London's reduced vortex between all heavier groups & lights and between mediums & smalls is just a 'trial'...(O.K a veeeerrrrry loooong trial)...not a question of different standards for different parts of the country in which what's required in one (large) place would get you 1261'd elsewhere...no, no, not at all!!!!
Tori
London's reduced vortex between all heavier groups & lights and between mediums & smalls is just a 'trial'...(O.K a veeeerrrrry loooong trial)...not a question of different standards for different parts of the country in which what's required in one (large) place would get you 1261'd elsewhere...no, no, not at all!!!!
Tori
Having experience of flying into the New York airfirlds from the north, one cannot read this statement without showing signd of incredulity! Leaving the class A airspace at 180 to then mix it with GA in class G airpace in a 747 keeps you on edge. I've had several TCAS RAs doing this including one with four skywriting Harvards legally flying intermediate 500' levels through the Victor routes! Not to mention the Carnarsie approaches on the 13s at JFK while perfectly good ILSs are available.
Safe, my @rse!
Safe, my @rse!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of 50N
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's quite safe and works quite well, we just don't have as much ellitist airspace here and let everyone use it
And I doubt that many 'heavy metal' drivers in the US are that keen on the 'see and avoid' priniciple....
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm reluctant to compare ATC systems - I've worked with the worst and (IMHO) the best... but I am a serious believer in Class A airspace where everything is controlled for commercial traffic.. Descending into US airports I find myself looking nervously out of the window, whereas descending into the UK I find myself very relaxed watching the scenery. (NO criticism implied of US controllers - they have to work with their systems like we work with ours and they do a fine job).
Ohcirrej
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bren makes an excellent point. Comparing systems in different countries is like comparing chocky eggs and apples. Every country has it's own little tweaks on ICAO SARPs that works for them. I do take some exception with the "Our system is better than yours because........", especially when the offending party has never actually worked the airspace they are slagging.
The Original Party Animal
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Around the corner
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jerricho,
Agreed, systems are different and it's futile to discuss those differences.
But airspace classifications and its definitions are the same everywhere and therefore the implications are at least very similar as well (although there are factors like size of airspace, complexity and amount of movements to be considered).
So it is comparable to a certain extent.
We've had numerous so called "legal encounters" between VFR and IFR TFC in airspace E in the vicinity of a regional aerodrome.
There's a TMZ inside the TMA, so as an ATCO you would often get multiple STCA alerts (one IFR against several VFR) and the IFR flights would receive TCAS alerts (TAs and RAs).
I've had 1NM/0ft "legal encounters" there. Pretty heart stopping stuff!
And as I've mentioned this is in class E airspace, not G!
So the conclusion is:
"Legal" doesn't necessarily mean "safe".
Agreed, systems are different and it's futile to discuss those differences.
But airspace classifications and its definitions are the same everywhere and therefore the implications are at least very similar as well (although there are factors like size of airspace, complexity and amount of movements to be considered).
So it is comparable to a certain extent.
We've had numerous so called "legal encounters" between VFR and IFR TFC in airspace E in the vicinity of a regional aerodrome.
There's a TMZ inside the TMA, so as an ATCO you would often get multiple STCA alerts (one IFR against several VFR) and the IFR flights would receive TCAS alerts (TAs and RAs).
I've had 1NM/0ft "legal encounters" there. Pretty heart stopping stuff!
And as I've mentioned this is in class E airspace, not G!
So the conclusion is:
"Legal" doesn't necessarily mean "safe".
I am a serious believer in Class A airspace where everything is controlled for commercial traffic.. Descending into US airports I find myself looking nervously out of the window, whereas descending into the UK I find myself very relaxed watching the scenery
Join Date: May 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mybe the point is that US airspace is the safest for the variety of airspace users using it.
No argument that if you keep aircraft out the airspace is really safe but the Class A is only so safe.
Someone quoted an accident in the US as a reason for the introduction of TCAS.
One could always quote the Swiss collision which proves that Class A and TCAS does not always work.
Having flown in the US and the UK, if you are not a Class A user the UK is far more unsafe.
At least in the states, when the weather is IMC you need an IR to fly in the Class E.
Airspace management depends on the airspace usage policy. The US has to meet a wide requirement of users, the UK is loaded towards the airlines.
No argument that if you keep aircraft out the airspace is really safe but the Class A is only so safe.
Someone quoted an accident in the US as a reason for the introduction of TCAS.
One could always quote the Swiss collision which proves that Class A and TCAS does not always work.
Having flown in the US and the UK, if you are not a Class A user the UK is far more unsafe.
At least in the states, when the weather is IMC you need an IR to fly in the Class E.
Airspace management depends on the airspace usage policy. The US has to meet a wide requirement of users, the UK is loaded towards the airlines.
Ohcirrej
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
airspace classifications and its definitions are the same everywhere and therefore the implications are at least very similar as well
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth ARTCC ZFW
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ebenezer;
The accident that you spoke of happened when a VFR aircraft not talking to anyone entered class B airspace and was not seen by the radar controller who was working the DC9. Same thing could have happened anywhere with restrictive airspace. The biggest difference is that here we have a HUGE amount of GA aircraft who are used to flying close to busy airspace. Most of them remain clear of the class B airspace as they are supposed to. You don't have any class A violaters around London do you??? Thought so <G>...
regards
Scott
The accident that you spoke of happened when a VFR aircraft not talking to anyone entered class B airspace and was not seen by the radar controller who was working the DC9. Same thing could have happened anywhere with restrictive airspace. The biggest difference is that here we have a HUGE amount of GA aircraft who are used to flying close to busy airspace. Most of them remain clear of the class B airspace as they are supposed to. You don't have any class A violaters around London do you??? Thought so <G>...
regards
Scott
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<<You don't have any class A violaters around London do you??? >>
I presume you're joking, Scott? If I had a dollar bill for every one I've seen - and taken avoiding action on - I'd be living in luxury on a south seas island! Serious infringements don't happen too often - we don't have as many clockwork mice here in the UK as you do - but when they happen it often causes chaos.
I presume you're joking, Scott? If I had a dollar bill for every one I've seen - and taken avoiding action on - I'd be living in luxury on a south seas island! Serious infringements don't happen too often - we don't have as many clockwork mice here in the UK as you do - but when they happen it often causes chaos.
