Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Altitude restrictions

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Altitude restrictions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Feb 2005, 12:50
  #1 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: South East
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Altitude restrictions

On the Lorel arrival to Stansted the procedure has an altitude restriction of FL200 at PEDIG and FL150 at CLIPY. We are usualy cleared to decend 200 by PEDIG and then handed over to 119.77. As soon as we check in we are invairably recleared FL150 by CLIPY.

My question is does the previous 200 by PEDIG still apply or has it been superceeded by the 150 CLIPY?

At the moment I still make the 200 at PEDIG and then slow the decent to make the 150 by CLIPY. If however the PEDIG restriction has been superceeded I could just adjust imediatly to make 150 at CLIPY and keep a continuous decent profile. What are you ATC guys expecting?

Ta!
batty is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 13:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: surrey
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you have been given a new level instruction it supercedes the previous one, i.e. the FL200 by PEDIG is no longer a restriction.

However the controller may say to you "Descend FL150 level by CLIPY, cross PEDIG FL200 or below" if he or she wishes you to fulfill the original clearance.

If they have not reiterated the "cross PEDIG FL200 or below", then you can descend at any rate, as long as you make the new clearance i.e."level by CLIPY"

Last edited by ukatco_535; 20th Feb 2005 at 15:09.
ukatco_535 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 16:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep as UKatco 535 says. There was a lot of debate about this point on here a while back with some varying views from controllers. The ones who disagree with the above are wrong, as with any clearance, the issuing of a new one supercedes the last and any conditions required must be restated.
Vlad the Impaler is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 18:46
  #4 (permalink)  

Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: South East
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good news thanks but one more question in which case why the initial Pedig restriction if its immediatly overuled by the next sectors Clipy restriction? Why not just 150 by Clipy?
batty is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 20:03
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Atlanta,GA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Batty

Im going to give this a try, Im not a controller but a pilot who spends to much time with atc simulators.

If Im not totally wrong the London TMA sector BNN (119.77) "ownes" from FL195, while S27 (130.92 i think) ownes down to FL195. Airplanes on Lorel arrival will leave sector 27 through its vertical boundary. Now to meet the CLIPY restriction airplanes need to enter BNN sector in good time for controller to be able to accomodate its further descent. So therefore a ROGBI is inserted in the arrival for S27 to be able to transfer airplanes on to BNN.

Now, this is just my guess, but I hope its correct.

Cheers / Duece

Edit: My brain is like a mushroom after the weekend
duece19 is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 20:20
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A more simple answer is that we are a little lazy, actually that isn't true, we are a little busy !! when you are given descent FL200 Level PEDIG and then the TC Midlands controller transfers you to TC N. What North should really say to you is "Descend FL150 level CLIPY, cross PEDIG FL200 or below". When you have sixty + ac to talk to in an hour that involves a lot of extra words which although technically so, are not practically necessary.
The standing agreements between sectors include a bit which says the receiving sector will not issue any instructions which will affect the expected climb/descent profile set up by the previous sector. By removing the previous level restriction this is no longer guaranteed. In reality it often make little difference but there are cases where the level restriction is required to separate traffic from other routes (ie L9 inbounds to TMA from Bristol sector FL140 40 before OCK, if this is not met it can get very embarassing against the gatwick inbounds southbound at FL150 which transit OCK airspace but do not work the sector !!). In these cases I would expect that the level restrictions are more strictly applied.
Hope that answers the question !!!!!!
Vlad the Impaler is offline  
Old 20th Feb 2005, 21:04
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NATS have recently re-advised ATCO's that by issuing a level clearance, it will supercede anything already told to the pilot in relation to level by's unless they are re-itterated.

The Standing Agreements are in place so that as a receiving ATCO you can be sure that the clearance will be met by, in your example, PEDIG, and therefore other aircraft in the sector can be climbed/descended relying on this.

If the transferring controller cannot make the restriction then a quick call alerts the receiving controller to the matter and an alternative solution formed if needed.

If the receiving controller has no traffic against your descent then they will not re-issue the first level restriction.
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 07:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Costa del Hampshire
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to be pedantic but.....

119.77 is TC North West Deps, not TC BNN (121.27)

TC Midlands do the descent to FL150 lvl Clipy before handing off to TC NW Deps.


Other than that a fair stab from deuce19, so 1 house point for you!!!
Barry Cuda is offline  
Old 21st Feb 2005, 08:01
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: surrey
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Batty,

I will try to give you a succint answer to your 2nd query; bear in mind I do not work the airspace you are on abou

A lot of sectors are split vertically as well as horizontally, and to give controllers a fighting chance, the majority of A/C which transit from one sector to another do so on 'Standing Agreements' this reduces the need for individual coordination between sectors, so cuts down on phone calls (imagine if a controller had to make a call for every A/C - it would be impossible to shift the traffic).

As a result, the most common and often used routes are subject to these standing agreements (i.e. known levels that A/C enter or exit sector to sector). These agreements allow some degree of separation. For instance sector A may give A/C to sector B at FL100, whilst sector B gives opposite direction A/C to sector A at FL110. This means that we can plan ahead and know what the majority of A/C inbound are going to be doing (it also means that until we start controlling you, you are safe!!)

If the sector A controller received an A/C from sector B at FL110 and it had nothing to affect it, then they could give it a further clearance immediately, if it suited them tactically.
ukatco_535 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.