Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Stansted Departrues

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Stansted Departrues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Feb 2005, 13:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Age: 74
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy Stansted Departrues

As a "round-dial" operator with no FMS data-base, I find it increasingly challenging to adhere to the exact departure track on some of the Stansted SIDs, as compared to our FMS database glass cockpit-equipped airplanes, who seem to have no difficulties with these SIDs. Has Stansted tightened the tolerances on these SIDs as far as track adherence is concerned? What are the most common problems with track violators and can you give us any advice on techniques to better comply with the tracks? Also, when you say "no speed restrictions" immediately after departure, doesn't this imply that a faster airspeed during the departure would automatically lead to overshooting of various turnpoints? Why do you state "no speed restrictions" during a Stansted SID when speed control is critical to making the tight turns necessary to adhere to track?

Thanks very much for any insight you can provide to these questions.
Globally is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2005, 14:04
  #2 (permalink)  
Warped Factor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Globally,

Can't comment on the EGSS specific stuff, but the speed restriction is primarily there for ATC separation purposes during the early stages of the flight.

If there are no separation isues from preceeding traffic the speed restriction can be lifted with the phrase "no ATC speed restriction".

This releases you from the 250kts below 10,000ft restriction but it doesn't mean you must then accelerate. Although most do go faster when the speed restriction is lifted it is not a requirement, you can fly at whatever speed you think appropriate until such time as you're happy to go faster.

So if you're released from the speed restriction but think going quicker will make track keeping more difficult, don't accelerate until you're sure you're not going to have any problems.

HTH.

WF.
 
Old 8th Feb 2005, 14:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I cannot answer the FMS question, however, when we say,' No ATC Speed restriction' it means just that ! You do not have to accelerate. If you have an aircraft behind, I may ask you to accelerate. We may say, 'after the turn. no ATC speed restriction.
Its up to you what speed you fly.
Over+Out is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2005, 21:31
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The tracks of the stansted npr's are a corridor 1.5nm either side of the centreline ( I think). I know some operators have had trouble with track keeping on certain routes and one of our freight customers has reduced max speed to 185kts after departure on the sid to reduce track overshoots. When given No Speed by radar controller it is still your responsibility to adhere to the noise preferential routing until 3000' for CPT,BKY,BUZAD and 4000' LAM,CLN,DVR,LYD departures. If accelerating is likely to compromise this then you can expect to get into trouble for it so don't do it !! The noise monitoring unit have ears everywhere and field quite a few complaints when someone makes a din !!
As you mention, the glass cockpit boys and girls have no trouble. The 737-800 tracks overlay each other exactly, every time smack down the middle. You could always come up and chat about it or arrange a visit to the noise unit (NTK) which is based at enterprise house.
Vlad the Impaler is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2005, 21:50
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Over and out

' No ATC Speed restriction' it means just that ! You do not have to accelerate.
Oh no it doesn't

It means exactly as you say and if they chose to go to economic climb the speed may reduce.

9 out of 10 transmissions saying no ATC speed restriction are either meaningless or counter productive.
Findo is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 08:32
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Findo,

I do not understand your reply.
Over+Out is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 13:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nor do I... come on Findo... please explain!
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 14:28
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FINDO

It looks like you are saying the same as Over+Out, so why disagree?

If speed is not restricted that means any speed can be flown.
VectorLine is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 14:28
  #9 (permalink)  
Just another number
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I too find Fido's post confusing. I have always understood the term 'No ATC Speed Restriction' to be removing the maximum speed limit. It is often necessary to resrict the speed to well below the maximum, especially in certain wind conditions, so as to maintain the SID track.
Am I correct in thinking that turns on SID tracks are designed with a maximum speed of 210kts? I don't have a copy of PANS-OPS at home so can't check.

Airclues
Captain Airclues is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 14:38
  #10 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: South East
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a former 'Round Dial' operator I used to hold the speed back around the turns on the departures out of Stn to ensure that I made the turns without overshooting.

Now as a glass operator I still ensure that the departure maintains a max of 220kts until around the corners.

If you speed, up either glass or dials, you will overshoot the turns, 'Yea canna change the laws of physics'. If ATC remove the speed restriction they are not removing the track keeping constraint!
batty is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 18:27
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The published NPR is 1.5km either sie of the centreline of the NPR. The SID track and the centreline of the NPR are however not identical, as the radials change with magnetic varioation, whilst the centreline of the NPR is a DfT published line on the ground. The Stansted Flight Evaluation Unit (FEU based in Entreprise House is worth a visit to understand what is trying to be achieved on departure. Stansted are currently the only UK airport to fine operators £500 for flagrant off track departures. There are get out clauses, but please ensure you do all you can to remain within the swathes up to 3000/4000ft. Don't forget though at night (2330-0600) ATC have vectroing restrictions that mean they can not take an aircraft off the NPR until 4000ft.
Hope this clears up the track keeping issue.
To add to all that has been written, the removal of the speed restriction just take the max. 250kts below FL100 limitation off, if you want to decelerate, then there is nothing stopping you...
pheighdough is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 18:40
  #12 (permalink)  
Just another number
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pheighdough

I would like to visit the FEU so as to pass the information on to our company pilots. Can this be done within the 30 minutes visitor parking restriction at Enterprise House, or do I need to catch the shuttle bus from Stansted House?

Airclues
Captain Airclues is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 20:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 762
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tolerance to NPRs departing Stansted, and I'm sure most other airports, is extremely important. In Stansted's case, because the airport is continually growing and is looking towards handling 35 million pax per annum with a single runway and now the Government want a second runway to be in operation by the year 2012, aircraft noise is very high on the minds of those opposing these growth plans.

Any deviation from NPRs at Stansted is fully investigated to find out the cause so no re-occurrence occurs. Flagrant deviations are subject to financial penalties and if repeated could ultimately result in the operator being refused permission to operate into Stansted.
Musket90 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2005, 20:16
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Phieghdough, I have to agree with your post as it is a virtual cut and paste of mine !!!(except I said nm and you said km !)
Vlad the Impaler is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2005, 07:13
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Firstly, Captain Airclues, you're better off catching the bus, as a visit to teh FEU will take in excess of the ridiculous 30 minute parking restriction.
Secondly., I know I reiterated your post Vlad, but I think it is an important point, particularly when fines are in place, just ask the pilots of an airline who have to pay the £500 from their own pockets...
pheighdough is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2005, 15:25
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No worries, Makes a nice change for someone to agree with me !!
Vlad the Impaler is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2005, 18:14
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LONDON
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Devil Stansted Departures

Pheidough,

Your posts are interesting. I have visited numerous airport FEU's and all are very helpful. What I found suprising is that they are on our side. Anyway, the level of data is extremely useful and I was pleased to see what goes on on the other side of the fence! By the way, they can sort out any car parking issues! Definately worth a visit
EASTENDBOY is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.