Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

Atc Clearance At Leeds Bradford

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Atc Clearance At Leeds Bradford

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Dec 2004, 17:42
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Smile Atc Clearance At Leeds Bradford

Noticed the last three days or so that flights at LBA can now call for their ATC clearance when they call for push and start, as opposed to having it issued during taxi. I understand this is just a trial run at the moment and I'm sure it's been tried before about five or six years ago. Anyway, it's a bit of a step forward but I'm wondering what's led to it being taken. Suggestions from the airlines, improved comms between the tower and MAN ATCC perhaps ??

I don't work in ATC but I'd be interested to know nonetheless.
Answers on a postcard please...
Mooncrest is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2004, 17:46
  #2 (permalink)  

Manchesters Most Wanted PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing's changed at our "end" as far as I'm aware
bagpuss lives is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2004, 22:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: EGLL
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I have heard this is a trial. A few years ago this was suggested but rejected. The change has come about due to experienced ATCO's from other units joining the LBA team and making suggestions. It is also to do with the increase in flights and to try and reduce workload and co-ordination between tower and approach.
ILS 119.5 is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2004, 22:05
  #4 (permalink)  
Spitoon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Ah, new blood. But it takes a while for new ideas to be accepted by the old timers (usually 'til they retire in my experience)!
 
Old 10th Dec 2004, 19:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're not kidding....

How many ATCO's does it take to change a light bulb.....?
Evil J is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2004, 20:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SATCO.... "That Lighbulb is non-op!"
Watch Manager.. "So it is"......thinx....."Tower Supervisor, there is a none functioning desk illuminating item there"
TWR Sup to long suffering ATCA [it's his lightbulb..."Call engineering, PDQ to fix said item"
ATCA applies his accumulated knowledge and "thumps" the offending item. Result...It works
Answer none , all you need is a good ATCA
watp,iktch
chiglet is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2004, 21:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Out on the bike in Northumberland
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Evil J-you implying us dinosuars can't take change?
you've still got four sim runs yet!
almost professional is online now  
Old 11th Dec 2004, 01:04
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
At some non-NATS units there can be a stick-in-the-mud attitude. This is because of a lower turnover of staff, I think. It can be surprising how some ATCOs are so fixed in their ways.

Clearances being passed to aircraft at the holding point creates unneccessary workload in the cockpit. Fair enough (& often neccessary) for an ammendment to be passed, i.e. "stop climb at..." but there is no justifiable reason for the SIDs not to be given on stand.

There is a TWR refurbishment about to take place and I understand that the new desk & comms gear will necessitate some changes to their ADC - APR coordination practices. This could well be part of that. Should make things easier on the flightdecks too!

This is not meant to sound too critical of ATC @ Leeds. I know that there are many professional & flexible ATCOs there. A few, however, could do with opening their eyes to the world outside the Peoples' Republic of Yorkshire!

Eggs Petition is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2004, 10:13
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Blimey, look what I started !

Just to veer ever so slightly off thread, the Tower frequency at LBA doesn't half get crowded at times so here's a brainwave from a non-ATC person. Allocate a discrete frequency for published busy times only purely for clearance delivery for all instrument and VFR traffic to be manned by an appropriately trained ATCA(gasp !). Takes some pressure off the Tower controller so he or she can concentrate on actual movements and would be cheaper than having a GMC position. Now, I know I'm probably being over-simplistic and demonstrating a lack of appreciation of the overall picture but it's just an idea. There, I've said it. Time to take cover.

PS I would be more than happy to do the job. Just let me know !

PPS Chiglet. What on earth does watp,iktch mean ??
Mooncrest is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2004, 12:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All european airports are in the process of implementing the "European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions".

Recommendation 4.5.3 states "where practicable give ATC clearance prior to taxi".

LBA is just introducing what is soon to be universal practice.
Exospheric is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2004, 17:26
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: EGCC
Age: 74
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On behalf of the poor Chiglet - who gets stuck when it comes to long words (hence the list of initials that look like some strange word that should have been spoken by a Vulcan - or some other inter-galatic species).

Originally he use to sign his messages with "We aim to please, it keeps the cleaners happy". Now, with retirement around the corner, he finds it hard to spend so much time at the keyboard and needs to come up for air and can only manage the abbreviated version.

Sorry Chiglet - I presume that means no more drinking sessions, or that I now owe you double rations!!!

Scottie Dog

ps - a happy Christmas to you all and a Very prosperous New Year.
Scottie Dog is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2004, 21:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Near Stalyvegas
Age: 78
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Scottie,
Basket, Wishfull, No, Wrong, treble
We [realy] do aim to please, it [really does] keep the cleaners happy.
Merry Chrimbo Sue [the cleaner] and All The Best to my Many,many,ok any fans
Cheers xxxx "hic"
chiglet is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2004, 22:07
  #13 (permalink)  

Manchesters Most Wanted PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't seen her around for a while. Have you scared her off chig?

If you ask me, and I realise you didn't, anyone who braves cleaning the 4th floor gents loos (pungencies and all) on a daily basis deserves not only us "aiming to please", but a bloody medal.

Quite what this has to do with ATC clearances at LBA is another matter. Sorry
bagpuss lives is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2004, 17:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Manchester
Age: 79
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't exactly remember when LBA introduced SIDs - probably 10 years ago?? Prior to that an individual clearance had to be obtained for most of their flights. MACC issued the clearance. With SIDs, this useful reform ought to have come in long ago.

It's probably only an internal LBA change to procedures since MACC hardly need to be involved. So long as the SID and "Squawk" and frequency are agreed with MACC then there really is no more to it.
peatair is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2004, 11:58
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northern Monkey
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I`m a controller at Leeds and can confirm that the clearance on stand system is undergoing a trial until the end of the week when hopefully it will become permanent. Its already being stated that there is no good reason not to pass the SID before pushback and a Eurocontrol directive advises against passing clearances during the taxi to prevent runway incursions. As well as this we are instaling a new comms system that means the way we work needs to change by reducing the amount of co-ordination between tower and radar. Clearance on stand achieves this as under the old system tower would request the clearance, radar would ring Manchester and then pass the whole clearance to tower which would need to be read back exactly. This was then passed to the pilots. Under the new system tower simply requests a release from radar as the clearance has already being passed. The radar controller simply says released or passes an alternative clearance (eg stop climb at 3000ft). This significantly reduces intercom work and also is more helpful to the crews ie not writing down clearances whilst looking out of the window to avoid bashing into anything, or taking a clearance whilst halfway through the check list. Any further comments about the system would be appreciated.

Bye for now. Cowboy
BookEm is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2004, 15:47
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have a similar thing going at Aberdeen. Although it has been available for a few years now, we have recently made the procedure more formal by offering the clearance on start up if it has not already been requested. The driver behind this is the European Action Plan for the Prevention of Runway Incursions - a fascinating read and imprinted on my mind for years to come no doubt! An airport Managing Director's Directive has also been issued to bring this to the attention of operators.

We currently issue clearances without the squawk as that is usually obtained when the aircraft requests start, however I'm aiming to improve on this by late January when the squawk will also be available a short time (between 5 and 20 minutes) before start.
U R NumberOne is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2004, 17:24
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Thankyou for your responses folks. I'm keen to learn so please keep on indulging me.

BookEm. It's a good move and one of several enhancements made over the years. BTW, I have sent you a PM.
Mooncrest is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 10:01
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Somewhere in England
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just wondered if anyone knows when the Tower refurbishment at LBA is due to commence and how long it's expected to take.
The Great Unwashed is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2005, 15:18
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: EGLL
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have heard, due to another management cock up, that it will not happen for another few months. Looks like the Directors have moved money out of the ATC budget to pay for other things, like dancing sirls to promote a new destination, punch and judy, a brass band and even new cars for the board.
Aah safety at its foremost!
ILS 119.5 is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2005, 14:20
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: LEEDS
Posts: 1,261
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I seem to remember the tower refurb was first mooted at least two years ago so I can't think why it's taking so long. There is an emergency VCR on the south side which I believe is ready to move into.

On the outside, things sound okay, i.e. reasonable quality of the received audio and the signal strength. The hum and the tapping sound that accompany most transmissions (listen carefully and you'll hear) would however indicate that the switch is past its best. I don't know what things are like on the inside. Do the phones and tie-lines etc work OK ??

I hope the job gets done soon. Although the equipment appears ok from the listener's point of view, the fact that replacement has been planned for some considerable time indicates that it actually needs doing and isn't just a nice idea. Ironically, the design and circuit diagrams (which were produced in-house when this equipment was first installed) were used as a blueprint by NATS engineers for their own Towers so it must have been good at the time !

Last edited by Mooncrest; 28th Jan 2005 at 08:38.
Mooncrest is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.