Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

national pay and conditions

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

national pay and conditions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Dec 2004, 15:35
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: national
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
national pay and conditions

A few controllers were talking recently about the difference in pay and conditions at various non NATS units, up and down the country.
Most of the causes for discontent were, as a result of ATC being linked with other airport workers when it came to annual pay negotiations.
We would like to know, are ATCO’s/ ATCA’s interested in a national organisation linking all non NATS units.
Imagine the buying power when it came to loss of licence insurance for example, or private health care etc.
We are aware that Prospect represent a few non NATS units, and that a while ago they tried, we believe, unsuccessfully, to establish a non NATS branch, perhaps they could comment on the matter
What we are proposing is not the formation of a rival union, but a body or group that would lead to a nationally agreed set of minimum terms and conditions for ATC personnel.
catcu2004 is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2004, 12:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good idea, could this not be attempted through GATCO who have NATS and non-NATS members or is it outside of their remit?
slotbuster is offline  
Old 6th Dec 2004, 11:24
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: national
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Slotbuster

We don't think GATCO would get involved with pay and conditions since it is an apolitical organisation. RAF members are also members.
As we see it this would be directed at establishing a national norm for pay and conditions, sick pay, annual leave, loss of licence, and of course pay, However from the obvious lack of interest one can only assume that most people are happy with their own systems
catcu2004 is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2004, 06:40
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: A galaxy far far away
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some kind of organisation that assistants could join would be nice, sometimes feels pretty lonely out here

coolbeans is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2004, 14:08
  #5 (permalink)  
cdb
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Up, up and away
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought Prospect had an ATC Branch, not a NATS Branch! If enough controllers at a tower joined, wouldn't that get you representation with the expertise already in place?
cdb is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2004, 18:05
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: South Coast
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Assistants within NATS are members of PCS. Don't know how viable membership of PCS would be for ATSAs in the "non-state" sector.
Fletchers Left Boot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.