Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

Pet Peeves

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Dec 2001, 21:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Pet Peeves

Hi guys,

As a pilot I am interested in hearing from ATC what we as pilots can do to make things easier(maybe it will also make our lives easier).

So what do we do that peeves you the most and how do we avoid it.

4g_handicap is offline  
Old 16th Dec 2001, 23:18
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Stay on the ground!

OK so seriously then.

Biggest thing i think is monitor the r/t effectively & use standard phraseology as much as possible.
Spotter is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2001, 16:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

At the end of every single read-back using the word "confirm?". Very annoying.
ferris is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2001, 22:04
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Not reading back clearances in the correct order.

ie. "After the landing 747, cross runway 27L"

Rather than the more usual "Cross runway 27L......." Cue mucho panic ".......after the landing 747."

Arrrrrgh! One day somebody's just going to readback "Cross runway 27L" and the ATCO will think he/she's heard the condition as well.

Gonzo.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2001, 09:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Fort Worth ARTCC ZFW
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Not using a callsign... <grrrrrrrrrrr>
Scott Voigt is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2001, 11:30
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hi Scott,

Yes yes, okay, I should have put a callsign in.........



Gonzo.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2001, 11:52
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Read back speed controls on final approach.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2001, 18:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Deepest darkest Inbredland....
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Just listen the first time!!!!!!!!!!!!
terrain safe is online now  
Old 18th Dec 2001, 19:06
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Under the surface
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Be aware that although you may be taking thing easy, we may be busy! ( The same applies the other way, i know.. I'm working on it...!) See FIS's comments above and that will help us all!
Cryolosophorous is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2001, 19:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

asking where you are in the sequence for departure, especially when there's about 15 at the holding point. waste of time. just expect to be there for 20 mins, if you get away any earlier its a bonus.
evenflow is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2001, 22:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

evenflow, I know what you mean.

I was doing 27L departures last month, very busy, 15-20 at the hold. Just had an emergency land on 27R, closing the runway for 10 mins, so we had a few landers on 27L, this was followed by TEAM with continuous landings on the departure runway because inbound delay had reached 40 minutes. However, the gaps were only 8 miles so not really allowing me to get a decent flow going. I had a Cat B helicopter operating nearby so traffic info had to be passed to everyone.

I had three a/c call me for their sequence number in one minute, and to the last one I said: "I'll call you back when I can, I'm very busy."

Another minutes passes and "Uuuh, tower, request our number for departure."

"Okay, the next one to ask for their sequence will be last"

Peace and quiet!

Gonzo.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 18th Dec 2001, 22:54
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 2,212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Asking for a turn on track "when available" when it's pretty obvious we're going to do that, also asking for a handoff to the next unit (which you normally ask when we're on the phone to them doing it)

In short - don't ask for the bleedin' obvious

CM
Chilli Monster is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2001, 03:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Oz
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Despite all the technical changes in ATC, we still have not been provided with a crystal ball. Let us know what you want / require, in plenty of time. We can't read your mind or see into the future. <img src="wink.gif" border="0">
89 steps to heaven is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2001, 15:48
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: EDUU
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

What hurts us quite a bit is requesting descend and then, after receiving a clearance, tell us: "we call you leaving". Thatīs the Singapore way but threre are a few others.
romeowiz is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2001, 17:39
  #15 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Thanks guys,

I don't really fly in your part of the world, but still lots of useful stuff(that does apply here).

I can understand the fustration of continual requests regarding position in sequence. I may have been guilty of that in the past, but it is more to gauge delays than impatience - we are often sitting with a plane load of pax and we have to tell tham what is going on.

Please keep it coming.
4g_handicap is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2001, 01:22
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If you need a backtrack tell us in plenty time so we can ask radar for a gap.
stop the climb is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2001, 06:41
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Asking for an intersection departure, getting it, lining up, then blocking the runway while asking how long is the runway. Should be a reportable offence.

Adding "if available" to any request Eg "request FL390, if available." Let me tell you I am not going to give you anything that's not available.

[ 21 December 2001: Message edited by: willadvise ]</p>
willadvise is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2001, 11:00
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Johannesburg
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Willadvise,

You make a good point - I can also own up to that.

Without sounding defensive, let me just say this :

I think it is just a thing pilots do to try and sound nice - like they are not insisting on it.

How would you suggest we emphasise the difference between something that we would "like" to have and something we "must" have eg aah - maybe a bad example, but say weather avoidance - definitely can't go through a thunderstorm, so that is not just a "nice" to have?

Thanx guys.
4g
4g_handicap is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2001, 12:27
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: EDUU
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

@4g: Say "we have to" with a "due to" - do not let us mix up a request with an urgent need! I once had an italian pilot on frequency requesting descent out of the cruising level, which was a complicated coordination due to airspace structure so I told him to stand by. After two times saying that he said that he canīt really do so because there is an engine on fire!
Avoiding wx is not a problem, just tell us you have to - in advance, please! Playing tricks is sometimes tolerated among a few of us. We do notice when the avoiding heading equals the direct routing to the destination. Insist on having to!
romeowiz is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2001, 19:49
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Costa del CYYZ
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I only have a few, and speaking as a UK ATCO, I think we are generally lucky that we operate in an environment with excellant pilots.

But here's what bugs me:

1. Very busy frequency with lots of stepped climbs and descents, pilot continually "approaching FLxxx requesting higher/lower"...usually pilots with an A or B ending flight number

2. "Any speed at CLIPY"....especially when the frequency is busy again, if not instructed that high speed is OK, then its standard speeds. When I'm at saturation on COWLY or NW, this kind of question is not what I need.

3. "c/s, approaching FLxxx, requesting lower"
"Negative, maintain FLxxx, traffic passing 1000ft below left/right"
"Roger we have him on TCAS"
Then why the hell did you ask in the first place !!! If I gave you descent the next words out of your mouth would be "TCAS Climb"

Really what I'm saying is a bit of situational awareness, if the frequency is really going, then please no extraneous requests, if you are getting stepped climbs, and descents then don't hassle for more, we don't give out step climbs/descents for fun it's because a thousand other green blips are all going up,down.left,right etc etc.

Minor quibbles really, on the whole British pilots and those who fly in UK airspace are really switched on and great to work with. I take my hat off to you ladies and gents.

It might be interesting to hear what pilots grumbles about us are, we might be able to help dispell some myths.
Expeditedescent is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.