Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

"A ***** state of affairs"

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

"A ***** state of affairs"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th November 2001 | 03:36
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: UK
Question "A ***** state of affairs"

(To quote Renton in Trainpotting)

Forgive me for being cynical, but in this post-Sept-11th-world we hear tales of woe from the airlines that numbers are down/flights are cut etc....

All the figures that I've seen suggest that traffic is only down about 10% - which takes us back to where we were 2 years ago.

Back in 1999, the concern was that NSC was already 4 years late (originally due in 1995) - and desperately needed. The current system at ScACC was not designed to deal with any more than 350000 movts per year - in 2000 there were about 430,000 - from memory. It strikes me as even more imperative that instead of delaying it yet another 2 years (opening 2008?) NATS should use the current dip to recover lost ground.

Accelerating the opening of NSC would accelerate the consolidation of Manchester ACC into NSC, leading to more savings in the long run.

Hello beancounters are you listening?
Mr Simple is offline  
Old 6th November 2001 | 17:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Here to Eternity
Post

Fair points made... but how do you pay for a multi-million pound project when you haven't got two pennies to rub together ?

Perhaps they also know a lot about Sean Connery... Although that's hardly a substitute.

Sorry... Trainspotting on the brain now!
Undercover is offline  
Old 8th November 2001 | 03:39
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: UK
Angry

Well for a start the Govt is supposed to have a 49% stake. Given that it is years of political prevarication that leaves us in our current state, it would not be unreasonable to expect them to provide an interim stake to keep the project going.... or does funding transport infrastructure stop at the roads ?

So much for all the fools who believed that privatisation would 'release NATS from lack of funding'.

"You're an evil shot Shickboy..."
"Thank you Mish Moneypenny..."
Mr Simple is offline  
Old 8th November 2001 | 11:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Here to Eternity
Question

Now... would bailing out NATS in any way now not have an added effect of proving that the whole debacle was a terrible idea from the start...?
The government arguing that this PPP was "releasing NATS from financial constraints" - when, in fact, the reality is closer to loan-sharking - doesn't look too honest now.

I wonder if Carol Vorderman's lot at First Plus could restructure THIS repayment plan?!

Sorry - soap box back in the cupboard now...

"I haven't felt this good since Archie Gemmill scored against Holland in 1978!"
Undercover is offline  
Old 9th November 2001 | 01:33
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 1998
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: UK
Post

But of course if it was south of Watford they'd find the money.

"Ohh ohh ohhh ohhhh OHHHH OHHHHHH YEEEEEEES"
Kelly Macdonald
Mr Simple is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.