Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > ATC Issues
Reload this Page >

SERCO to meet the Unions

Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

SERCO to meet the Unions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 02:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Fanny Adams
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post SERCO to meet the Unions

Apparantly the Unions are meeting SERCO tomorrow morning (wednesday) at SERCOs request. I gather SERCO would like to speak to IPMS to find out why they have publically backed the airline bid if PPP does go ahead.

Its quite obvious to me why the Unions are publically backing the Airline bid but apparantly not to SERCO. I just hope the unions tell SERCO in no uncertain terms what they can do with their bid and where they can stick it.

If anyone gets any wind of this meeting, I hope you will share it with us all.
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 04:30
  #2 (permalink)  
slurp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

fanny...if its true that SERCO are to meet the unions ,does that mean PCS are involved...i doubt it ....seems like the divide and rule tactic being used ....most probably going to offer IPMS/BALPA some concrete details on safety not affecting their grades...bye bye ATSA'S
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 19:08
  #3 (permalink)  
Kings Arms
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

or just say the unions were bloody minded etc. Spin Spin etc
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 19:41
  #4 (permalink)  
SercoController
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

I have worked for Serco for four years now. It is the best company around. It is also the largest purely private provider of ATC services in the world. Did you know we pushed 4.6 million SAFE aircraft operations here in the states last year alone? How many did the airlines move? None. They know nothing about safety in ATC. You would be lucky to work for Serco.
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 19:53
  #5 (permalink)  
slurp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

sercocontroller ...name the units run by SERCO in the US ...maybe we can see how many SERCO run units actually handled.Its a bit like Lydd claiming to handle 1.8 million SAFE aircraft.Think i would rather pass on the privilege of working for SERCO
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 20:36
  #6 (permalink)  
SercoController
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Oh I am sorry I was a bit unclear. In the US 300 Serco controllers moved 4.6 million safe operations last year. I can't provide you with all the facilities we run but if you contact the FAA it is public knowledge and they will tell you it is around 56 on this contract. I know it isn't as interesting as the unfounded claims that Serco would not adhere to safety, but on the other hand it is true.
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 20:46
  #7 (permalink)  
WebCreator
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Folks please remember that this is one of the guys in the US that has very obviously been SERCO'd to the stage where he's happy to come and post all over this newsgroup but at the first sign of foreign interest in his US newsgroup and SERCO, he shuts his newsgroup down and re-forms it in secret banning all who aren't from the inner sanctum - probably a SERCO shareholder!
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 20:51
  #8 (permalink)  
WebCreator
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

...and another thing...the last time I was on the sercoatcers website (I'm now banned by the way), there was a lady ATC person (position and grade unknown) complaining that she actually earnt LESS than her bin man! She really is compensated well for the responsibility she takes!
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 21:28
  #9 (permalink)  
SercoController
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

You are too misinformed to even try to educate. It is not your fault. But I look forward to working with you in our company.
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 21:35
  #10 (permalink)  
WebCreator
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Great attitude - condescending, pompous and insulting - your posting speaks volumes and represents your company well!
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 21:45
  #11 (permalink)  
Der SimMeister
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

SC.......
"working with you in our company"???

We should be so lucky. if Serco get the contract, many of us who provide valuable support to the ATCO's both operationally and non-operationally will be forced to seek new employment, or being forced to take swingeing pay cuts. The already under-pressure ATCO's will have to perform the support tasks themselves, which they need like a hole in the head.
We know what Serco are like when it comes to changing pay and conditions - here's an example:

http://www.lhmu.org.au/union/161.html

Of course the Serco share price has increased fourfold over the last four years, due to fierce costcutting (staff) and low wages. You cannot combine hard profiteering with safety. The two are incompatible. Serco will cut corners to make a profit. We have seen it before.
I know a number of people who have worked for Serco in the UK, and none of them.. and i mean none.. has had a single good word to say about them.
For example:
http://www.pprune.org/ubb/NonCGI/For...ML/000706.html

You are not on the board of NIMBUS by any chance are you??
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 21:57
  #12 (permalink)  
slurp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

think SERCO pays bonuses to staff who say good things about them......i wonder how the FAA employed ATCO's ever got along without SERCO?
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 22:05
  #13 (permalink)  
Mr Chips
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down

So Mr SercoController. You work for this wonderful company, and yet can't name a single unit that they operate. That is rather suspicious. I can name EVERY NATS unit.

SERCO know lots about ATC do they, more than the airlines? And they are experts in every other field that they are in? I doubt it.

Are you really a controller? I doubt it.
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 22:14
  #14 (permalink)  
SercoController
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Web,

I was not insulting you. You do not work for our company. You are misinformed. And I do not have time to educate you about Serco. It is a great company.

Der,

We have 500 contracts and over 28,000 emoloyees and I keep seeing the same ONE story about Austrailia. I admit I am not familiar with that contract. I am familiar with the safety programs, pay, and benefits as they relate to my ATC contract. I have been on both sides of the fence. I am a 20 year retiree of the FAA. Serco is a great company that cares for it's employees and puts safety ahead of the bottom line. I hope they privatize the FAA soon and Serco gets the contract. But we are all entitled to our own opinions.
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 22:15
  #15 (permalink)  
Data Dad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

having dug around a few websites (not helped by FAA's one appearing to be offline at the moment) I find that Serco bought Barton ATC who are operating as part of the FAA Contract Tower Initiative. Towers in this programme are all "Level 1 VFR Facilities"

In the UK these would probably be staffed with FISO's - hardly comparable to Heathrow/Gatwick/Manchester + the rest.

 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 22:17
  #16 (permalink)  
WebCreator
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Last I heard from the USA was that there are recommendations that the FAA should be run by a not-for-profit organisation - that CERTAINLY won't interest SERCO!
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 22:19
  #17 (permalink)  
SercoController
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Mr Chips,

Yes Serco does know much about ATC the Airlines do not. Yes Serco knows the work it does. Is there a point you were trying to make.

I am not going to type 56 facilities.

I don't really care if you think I am a controller.
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 22:28
  #18 (permalink)  
CIDINLINK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

Poor SC. Does he sound like a brainwash candidate or what?
Having been privatised once and by default having to work for the illustrious IAL/SERCO in the UK and having talked to some of those who still do, I can't really see why anyone would sing their praises.
The SATCO at the ATC unit I worked at was a longterm Company man. He became so impressed with SERCO that he left to join NATS where he is now a happy chappy. BUT ~ he has his resignation letter ready should SERCO succeed. Does that tell you anything?
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 22:31
  #19 (permalink)  
Der SimMeister
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

slurp,

that link doesn't appear to work?
 
Old 28th Feb 2001, 22:51
  #20 (permalink)  
slurp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

thats weird ...i put it into my faves copied it on to the site and it doesn t work...sorry..i ll try and sort it

[This message has been edited by slurp (edited 28 February 2001).]
 


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.