Wikiposts
Search
ATC Issues A place where pilots may enter the 'lions den' that is Air Traffic Control in complete safety and find out the answers to all those obscure topics which you always wanted to know the answer to but were afraid to ask.

NATS Pay/WP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jan 2004, 04:29
  #201 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Costa del Swanwick
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beep.

It's called supply and demand!
250 kts is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 04:31
  #202 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Costa del Hampshire
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beepbeep -

Bloody hell !! Another "fair play" (non-ATCO?) voice from the wilderness! And do I also perceive a little bit of inter-ATCO niggle creeping in on this and other associated threads?

Equal percentage rise across all ATC grades/jobs would have resolved this - nobody would feel cheated. I've said it once before, and I'll say it again - no friends where money is concerned.

Not even between ATCOs!! (especially band 5's and everybody else)

ha ha !!
Connex is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 04:55
  #203 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Supply and demand?

Do we really need all the ATCOs?

Do we have the beds for them?

Is the TV room big enough for them?

Fact is NATS needs all it's other grades just as much as it needs ATCOs but it expects them to be awake and at their desks during conditioned hours.
beepbeep is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 05:51
  #204 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Costa del Swanwick
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beep,

If we don't can I have early retirement now then please? Not a chance!!

The rest of your reply really doesn't deserve an answer.
250 kts is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 06:47
  #205 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: London
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We'd all love early retirement, especially on ATCO terms.

You don't answer the rest because you can't.
beepbeep is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 06:55
  #206 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear 250 Knots,

I have heard the "We are paying the top scales more in order that you all get more" argument probabley as often as you have however that does not alter the fact that the gap 'twix 2s and 3s just keeps on getting bigger.

It is very easy for you as a 2 (which I presume you are) to tell me I have to, once again, look on in awe as my colleagues pay jumps up. Now try being me, paying the same union dues as you, having my workload increase, having my T&Cs attacked and being told if I want to have may pay keep up with other people in NATS then I must change my life and tell me that you would consider that fair.

You wouldn't. If you are honest you know you wouldn't.

You can tell me to move, but that is to miss the point. I pay into my union but, as far as I and others like me can see Prospect isn't representing me to the same degree as it does you.
intentionally blank is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 07:07
  #207 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Destination 22
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
radar707

I have to agree - why should a single valid controller be deemed more busy/worth more than a dual valid (or more if you go further north - IZB) controller.

It should be the overall input/value/complexity/callitwhat you want of the unit that counts to the regrading (including outside CAS) - and if that means we have 10 bands then so be it - but make it a fair comparison (spelling??)

I have no problem with the pay deal on a "cost of living" basis.

The Unit Regrading I think should be re-thought.

No doubting that there are some units (christ we could get down to individual sectors if we want) which are more complex than others - and I think that most people would agree that the centres on a whole are busier (on a whole) than airports. Having worked at both I think I can comment fairly on this.

However I think the real problem lies in the airport gradings.

As an aside...

it was mentioned earlier that we all used to be ATCO IIs - well we bit that bullet and changed (for the most) - Why can't we change again to ATCO I - V??
Those that are happy at the less complex units can stay - as long as those guys (and gals) that want to move are given the opportunity to do so - and within a given time scale.

Sorry its taken so long for the rant.

Up Up And Awaaaayyyy

(Cue abuse from various quarters)

P.S Lets stop getting personal about people/units/training - it doesn't achieve anything - we are still one union - and if you have a voice you can still use it constructively.
Stupendous Man is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 16:12
  #208 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beep.

Methinks you are an engineer of some description. I understand why you may be disgruntled but having a poke at ATC staff this way is not effective.

It all comes down to market forces and management know it. Engineers are plentiful and ATCO's are not. ATCO/ATSA strikes = mayhem. Engineers / support staff / admin strike = minor annoyance.

If you are at LTCC have a go at getting plugged in in TC. That may change your mind!
Minesapint is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 16:27
  #209 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Southampton
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Supply and demand?

Do we really need all the ATCOs?"

Yes, that is why NATS offer bigger pay rises to ATCOs and are recruiting over 100 a year

"Do we have the beds for them?"

Just, thank you for asking.

"Is the TV room big enough for them?"

Yes, thank you again, but we could do with a bigger TV and more Channels.

"Fact is NATS needs all it's other grades just as much as it needs ATCOs...."

Fact is NATS is reducing the head count in all grades except ATCOs.

"....but it expects them to be awake and at their desks during conditioned hours."

Is the busiest time of your working day around 4am?
Arkady is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 18:53
  #210 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Southern England
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lon More...once again I ask, where did you get that HUGE chip that is on your shoulder ?? Or is it both shoulders and your back ?? Or perhaps it's now enveloping you completely ??

Hmmmmmm......Lone More, More than just an ATCO ? Well yes, I could think of a few choice words to add to that.



And instead of replying, let's take this private, eh ? Perhaps we could meet ? I would really enjoy that !!
Nogbad the Bad is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 19:30
  #211 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: England
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Halo

In your last post you also mentioned that NATS pumped money into the areas that provide the greatest returns; how come we don't have a band 6 with oceanic ATCOs in then?
Greebson is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 21:10
  #212 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Home
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I must say I'm fairly satisfied with the basic pay increase. I'll be voting yes.

I'm pleased that management stuck to the commitment to make the same basic offer to all NATS staff. This ensures that all grades and levels are given equal respect for the job they do and the relative cost of living their lives.

I'm a non-ATCO and personally wish all ATCOs well in getting whatever you can for changes in WP. It doesn't affect me and I'm sure whatever remuneration received will have a pound of flesh in the bargain. If it were my grades re-negotiating something and loooking for money I wouldn't expect ATCOs to want in on it, as it's nothing to do with them.

Just one small point to something said earlier.. quoting from memory so forgive any minor wording errors.. "ATCOs strike = chaos, ENG/Admin strike = minor hassle" Well I hope you'd still see it as a minor hassle if the admin staff went on strike resulting in a lack of overtime, AAVA, OJTI... oh and salary payments. Personally I'd like to keep getting paid.
Me Me Me Me is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 22:50
  #213 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Ayrshire, Scotland
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Somewhere in all this waffle was the theory that we were addressing the shortages by increasing the pay.

The current situation is that MACC is expected to be worst off for ATCOs over the next 3 to 5 years. How does the award of a bigger rise to HQ staff and the rest address this shortage ?
Findo is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 23:08
  #214 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Just North of France
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Findo,

I personally am not aware of the figures, however, if that is the case, I'm sure MACC controllers will be more than happy to do the AAVA's as we currently are at LACC. Then we can have a go on PPRUNE about how they get all the OT


Also, a question for the former ATCO 2 units that re-graded to ATCO 3. When you were re-graded, did NATS offer either a move to an ATCO 2 unit in the appropriate region, or a form of compensation for those who wished to stay?
AREA52 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 23:11
  #215 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: EGTT/FAB/LGW/BOH/FAB/LGW
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

Are we as ATSA's not getting regraded in the same way then??????
SilentHandover is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 23:26
  #216 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Just North of France
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Certainly not in the same way.

Although there are plenty of good ATSA's around, at our unit (LACC), the job has become considerably less involved than it was at West Drayton and it is well known that the management would have minimal numbers of ATSA's if they could.
AREA52 is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2004, 23:50
  #217 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: somewhere out there
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Prospect be warned, if you allow this to go to a ballot with BEC recommendation then you are going to find yourselves with a whole load of ATCO's less in your membership figures.

I used to be a firm believer in the union ethic, everyone standing together to fight for what is right and fair in the workplace.

How wrong I was.

This whole unit regrading fiasco is a mess and is just creating divisions amongst staff.

Who on earth thinks that someone who holds 2 validations, working traffic into and out of 2 airports in a busy TMA, providing a service to every man and his dog wanting a service outside that bit of CAS, plus dealing with all the inherent problems of RIS RAS aginst Military traffic and God Knows what else flying around in Bandit country, can be worth a whole load less than someone who holds a single tower validation at SS, it's hardly a complicated unit.

LL, KK yes, they deserve every penny and a whole lot more besides. As for CATC yet another way of rewarding people for failure, how many instructors on the radar course have been rewarded for failing by getting posted to CATC

I would love to go and teach at CATC, but I can't be released from my unit for God knows how long

A guy at my unit wanted to go to LL sailed throught the asessment, got a start date and then someone off his course at LL whinged because my "experienced, valid" colleague would be getting more money

I should have resigned from the union a few years ago after the pay negotiations fiasco then, but I was persuaded by my rep that the union was there to represent MY interests as a controller at a regional airport.

How wrong he was, funny thing now is that if this does go through then I've a feeling that my unit rep will resign from the union and maybe even a few more in Scotland, Ireland and Wales.

caniplaywithmadness is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2004, 00:29
  #218 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nogbad why should we take this private? You're the one tossing your teddy out the pram.

You chose to start throwing the insults. I refer you to another thread on the subject Jet Blast. Most of them could be applied to you and save me typing.

No chips on my shoulder: Ex CAA (shows how long ago) and now retired Area Supervisor.

BTW I posted my salary on a previous thread last year and can't be bothered to waste time or bandwidth repeating myself.

You express a wish to resort to violence, the last refuge of the mediocre; unfortunately I do not normally injure mental deficients but would be happy to make an exception in your case.

Further rants from yourself will be ignored until you grow up, although undoubtedly someone else will take exception to your obnoxious personality and terminate it long before that happens.
Lon More is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2004, 01:07
  #219 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Wivenhoe, not too far from the Clacton VOR
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent", to quote from FOUNDATION by Isaac Asimov.

Nothing to do with pay, but mildly more interesting than all this bickering.
Bern Oulli is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2004, 01:22
  #220 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bern....
You are still the funniest person I know!!!!

Well done - the best post in 15 pages of argument!

B-L
Bright-Ling is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.