ATC Sickness
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: EGLL
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ATC Sickness
Just heard that a certain regional airport is now starting to give written warnings to its staff if they have five separate unrelated sickness periods. This includes ATC staff and therefore ATCO's and ATSA's. If ATCO's are not allowed to work as per the ANO when they are sick, does this mean that the ATCO's will be put under pressure to work when they are feeling ill in fear of a written warning. Surely this is unsafe and what legal standing has the ATCO? What about the ATSA's would any ATCO want an assistant to work alongside trying to do a job in a professional way whilst ill? Imagine this, 2 days off for a migraine, 2 head colds during a year (quite common), a viral infection and some other form of sickness amounting to 10 days off in total. This means a written warning. Over three years this is 3 warnings and therefore dismissed! I don't think anybody in the ATC profession should be put under pressure to work if they are ill, I can see this in other working environments but not in the aviation industry.What do you think?
Manchesters Most Wanted PPRuNer
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ta! - and more to the point, oh dear.
We're supported very well in this respect. If we're ill we're told to stay away in no uncertain terms - it's as simple as that. Probably thanks to our Manager ATC (Area) who is a thoroughly decent chap!
We're supported very well in this respect. If we're ill we're told to stay away in no uncertain terms - it's as simple as that. Probably thanks to our Manager ATC (Area) who is a thoroughly decent chap!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: EGLL
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK but what are your views. I certainly would not like to be on a flight where either one of the pilots (or both), or any of the controllers were ill and under pressure to work in fear of losing their jobs. I thought the aviation industry was the safest in the world. This is not so if ATC staff are being made to work whilst ill in fear of losing their jobs.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UAE
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A certain place not a million miles from me will give you a warning for three periods of illness within each 12 months. So it is possible to have only three days off sick in a year and get disciplined. It`s also impossible to refuse overtime without the same risk.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Costa del Swanwick
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why are we so worried about "naming and shaming" these airports/employers?
Surely the more information that is in the public domain in respect of working conditions then the less liklihood there is that they will continue to get away with it-especially if they were to get few applicants for vacancies in the future.
Come on folks-if these are the FACTS then let's not be afraid to air them properly.
Surely the more information that is in the public domain in respect of working conditions then the less liklihood there is that they will continue to get away with it-especially if they were to get few applicants for vacancies in the future.
Come on folks-if these are the FACTS then let's not be afraid to air them properly.
Manchesters Most Wanted PPRuNer
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ILS 119.5 - I don't think 250kts was being "funny" about it - he / she actually has a very good point.
The only way practises like this will be stopped is if those who perpetuate such allegedly totalitarian and dangerous schemes are named and indeed shamed. For everyone's sake.
Imagine the popular BBC TV programme "Watchdog" if no company or product were ever named. It would lose 95% of it's power and 100% of its point and usefulness.
Do the people at these units have any sort of union representation? If so perhaps a formal discussion with management could and should take place if, as you say, lives are being put at risk.
There are official ways and means to do things if you believe things are so utterly serious after all, this isn't a game we're talking about here.
May I suggest also that http://www.chirp.co.uk/ is worthy of some viewing and participation on the matter.
The only way practises like this will be stopped is if those who perpetuate such allegedly totalitarian and dangerous schemes are named and indeed shamed. For everyone's sake.
Imagine the popular BBC TV programme "Watchdog" if no company or product were ever named. It would lose 95% of it's power and 100% of its point and usefulness.
Do the people at these units have any sort of union representation? If so perhaps a formal discussion with management could and should take place if, as you say, lives are being put at risk.
There are official ways and means to do things if you believe things are so utterly serious after all, this isn't a game we're talking about here.
May I suggest also that http://www.chirp.co.uk/ is worthy of some viewing and participation on the matter.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Cloud Nine
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
However I for one get pretty sick of continually covering for those who take the piss out of the system..... sickness is one thing but, (at a previous place of employment, in a galaxy far far away) I knew of some who had 26 days a year (often weekends and rarly more than 2 days at a time) - AND a 10 year previous track record/history - does every unit have it's SickNote or Lemsip?
How do you separate the legitimate from the malingerers ? I know ... you promote them
How do you separate the legitimate from the malingerers ? I know ... you promote them
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: EGLL
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
niteflite01 - Yes I agree, from what I know , most of the staff are p*****ed about the situation and chirp is the next avenue. First of all, if ATCO's and ATSA's are ill whilst on duty then Yes lives are being put at risk. I do not know if they have union representation, but the point is why should it go that far. Safety is the most paramount importance in the UK and worldwide, why should it come down to a pprune thread to discuss these situations. Why can't the powers that be see this and try to accommodate. I think, as said earlier, it's up to the Men from the Ministry to make a decision. If they read this, which I'm sure they will.
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cheshire, California, Geneva, and Paris
Age: 67
Posts: 867
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont think that NATS is immune from this "system" of pressuring employees to work when not fit. It is now NATS policy to refuse to promote or interview candidates for internal posts because of their sick record. If you are keen it might make you think about coming to work when not fit.
aceatco, retired
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: one airshow or another
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Any company will have Absence Controls in place, a system which should sort out the malingerers and encourage them back to work, and which helps people who are genuinely ill. But it is a fine line between applying a bit of pressure to encourage people not to go sick too often, and the requirements of an ATCO to present him/herself fit for duty.
ILS 119.5 - doesn't anyone feel comfortable enough to have a quiet word with your Inspector?
ILS 119.5 - doesn't anyone feel comfortable enough to have a quiet word with your Inspector?
Panthera pardus puella
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: here, sometimes there
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
frankly outrageous that folk will be put under pressure to come into work when they are unwell
maybe there are a few folk who swing the lead at the unit and therefore this is why da management are bringing this policy in?
(dc10 chap - nats have had that policy for a number of years - although at a unit i was working at a few years ago - a member of staff who was always sick for a saturday morning shift without fail and a good few sunday morning shifts was promoted despite this!!)
yaffs
maybe there are a few folk who swing the lead at the unit and therefore this is why da management are bringing this policy in?
(dc10 chap - nats have had that policy for a number of years - although at a unit i was working at a few years ago - a member of staff who was always sick for a saturday morning shift without fail and a good few sunday morning shifts was promoted despite this!!)
yaffs
StandupfortheUlstermen
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Peoples' Democratic Republic of Wurzelsetshire
Age: 53
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The unit Tower Ranger is talking about is Belfast City. I know, because I used to work there and was interviewed by my boss about my sick leave.
I get severe throat infections 2 - 3 times a year, but while the "management" (and I use the term very loosely) at the City thought I was taking the p1ss, I was able to prove that it was genuine. The ATSM was very supportive, but was obliged under company procedures to interview/counsel me. His report to the higher management suggested no further action, and indeed none was taken against me. However, the decision rests with the higher levels of management, not within the ATC dept. It's all a bit worrying really.
I know of members of staff who will come in to work ill, in order to preserve their sick records, as the City airport used to give an extra days leave to anyone who had an unblemished sick record for more than 12 months. Personally, I never felt the need to put passenger safety, my licence or my fellow ATCO's licences at risk by coming in while I was less than 100%, all for the reward of an extra 8 hours leave! Much better to have a few days off to sort yourself out.
I get severe throat infections 2 - 3 times a year, but while the "management" (and I use the term very loosely) at the City thought I was taking the p1ss, I was able to prove that it was genuine. The ATSM was very supportive, but was obliged under company procedures to interview/counsel me. His report to the higher management suggested no further action, and indeed none was taken against me. However, the decision rests with the higher levels of management, not within the ATC dept. It's all a bit worrying really.
I know of members of staff who will come in to work ill, in order to preserve their sick records, as the City airport used to give an extra days leave to anyone who had an unblemished sick record for more than 12 months. Personally, I never felt the need to put passenger safety, my licence or my fellow ATCO's licences at risk by coming in while I was less than 100%, all for the reward of an extra 8 hours leave! Much better to have a few days off to sort yourself out.
Ohcirrej
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hell, SN, you serious about the extra day's leave thing? That's effin outrageous. I don't think there would be much for anybody to stand on if, go forbid, after a serious incident an ATCO came out with "Oh, I've got the flu". Niteflite is right, raise the issue.
Unfortunately the system is open to people taking the p*ss out of it, and it does become apparent which individuals may come down with "soccer-itis".
Unfortunately the system is open to people taking the p*ss out of it, and it does become apparent which individuals may come down with "soccer-itis".
niknak
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was a time when I would have gone to work with a broken leg and my left arm dropping off, but no longer.
If you're not fit to work, you're not safe to work, it's as simple as that, it comes under duty of care, and the health and safety at work act, which is the responsibility of both employer and employee.
The management at "123.75" deserve everything they get for this ridiculous and petty minded approach - I only hope that there's maximum publicity on this subject, and the travelling public there find out exactly how little the airport authority think of their safety.
If you're not fit to work, you're not safe to work, it's as simple as that, it comes under duty of care, and the health and safety at work act, which is the responsibility of both employer and employee.
The management at "123.75" deserve everything they get for this ridiculous and petty minded approach - I only hope that there's maximum publicity on this subject, and the travelling public there find out exactly how little the airport authority think of their safety.
Last edited by niknak; 4th Nov 2003 at 03:15.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: UAE
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi SN , Yeah it`s pointless going in when your not up to it but as you know some people would rather colapse at their desks than admit they`re sick.
But don`t get me started on the sick pay scheme because I really don`t think anybody would believe it. I just hope I`m never seriously ill whilst in my present job.
But don`t get me started on the sick pay scheme because I really don`t think anybody would believe it. I just hope I`m never seriously ill whilst in my present job.