Log in

View Full Version : 777 VNAV descent logic


Check Airman
30th Nov 2023, 05:38
A few questions for the 777 gurus regarding the use of speed intervention. I understand that in descent, this causes PTH to revert to SPD, but my confusion is regarding how it this reversion affects the resulting profile.

Let’s assume we’re on profile in PTH at FL200 at 280kt. There is a crossing restriction of FL150 at the next fix and the MCP is set to FL100.

Scenario 1. If we use speed intervention to slow to 250kt, we end up above the profile. On reaching 250kt, does it attempt to recalculate a new profile, or just say DRAG REQUIRED and cross the fix above FL150?

Scenario 2. If we use speed intervention to accelerate to 310kt, will it add power to get to 310kt, then go back to idle once it reaches a new idle profile to the fix? Will it get to 310kt, and then descend at 1200fpm until intercepting the original profile? Will it simply do an idle descent at 310kt to FL150, then drive to the fix in VNAV ALT?

Is there a situation in which using speed intervention could cause VNAV to bust an altitude constraint?

I’ve tried looking for a bit more detail in the FCOM and FCTM, but with no luck. Are there any techniques you prefer using when a speed change is needed on a STAR? Would appreciate any document references available.

Thanks in advance!

mbcxharm
30th Nov 2023, 07:21
My two cents:-

Scenario 1: It will only recalculate if you enter (+execute!) the new speed into the FMC descent page. As you say this will likely leave you high on your 280kt profile, and probably high on a 250kt profile since that would naturally be shallower. Enter the new speed and see how high once you have finished decelerating (if you have time). Then use drag to get back on the profile. If you don’t have time (maybe the constraint is fast approaching or you are too low to justify going ‘heads down’ into the FMC) then just speed intervene and get the drag out straight away and eyeball it!

Scenario 2. Assuming you are in HOLD | ROLL MODE | VNAV PATH, when you speed intervene the autothrottle will remain in HOLD when the pitch mode changes to VNAV SPD. As you accelerate you go below the profile. If you don’t use speed intervention, when you enter the new speed into the FMC it will recalculate the profile, this time likely leaving you low. THR | ROLL MODE | VNAV SPD should be the new FMA with THR targeting 1250fpm to regain the profile. My preferred option is using V/S for a short time to maintain present rate of descent whilst accelerating. Then enter new speed into FMC, recalculate, then back to VNAV to regain profile as above.

It wouldn’t drive to the fix in VNAV ALT, but go from VNAV SPD to VNAV PTH to satisfy the constraint. It will only go VNAV ALT when levelling at the MCP altitude.

As far as busting the constraint - only if you use basic modes. Quote from FCTM Ch 4, Descent Constraints: ‘the selection of a pitch mode other than VNAV PTH or VNAV SPD for descent will result in a risk of violating altitude constraints.’ Note this is specifically referencing the ‘Alternate MCP setting procedure’ for closely spaced constaints. The normal procedure is to keep the constraint in the MCP (in your example FL150) until the constraint is ‘assured’. A bit annoying depending on where you are in the world and how the descent clearances are phrased there! This is where some ‘resilience’ may be required…

Check Airman
3rd Dec 2023, 01:50
Thanks much for your input and clarification. I wish the FCOM spelled that out a bit more clearly.