PDA

View Full Version : Single Engine Turboprop Military Aircraft


Stationair8
10th May 2022, 07:10
One for the Pprune experts.

A single engine turboprop monoplane taildragger, possibily French designed, and built in the 1950's?.

It may have started life with an inline piston engine, then re-engineered with a turbine engine later in the mid 1960's.

I think it may have been used by the Swiss airforce for target towing.

Regards
S8

SWBKCB
10th May 2022, 07:15
Farner Werke C-3605

The F+W C-3605, nicknamed Schlepp ("Tug") or "Alpine Anteater", was a target towing aircraft operated by the Swiss Air Force from 1971–1987. The aircraft was developed during the latter half of the 1960s by the Swiss Federal Construction Works (Eidgenoessische Konstruktionswerkstaette) (EKW), renamed Farner Werke (F+W) in 1972, as a conversion of the existing C-3603 ground attack/target towing aircraft. Following a successful prototype conversion in 1968, 23 aircraft were converted between 1971–1973 with 2 still flying in private hands.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F%2BW_C-3605

Asturias56
10th May 2022, 07:21
The Morane-Saulnier MS 1500 Epervier fits the bill but not sure if it was ever used by the Swiss


SWB has it I think

Stationair8
10th May 2022, 08:30
Thanks SWBKCB, greatly appreciated for that info.

l.garey
10th May 2022, 08:47
Here is a Schlepp at Lausanne in 2011.
Laurence
https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/2000x1504/dscf0005_30540d27eba20de0c674965ac245e8e5bf5573af.jpg

Pypard
10th May 2022, 14:37
The Morane-Saulnier MS 1500 Epervier fits the bill but not sure if it was ever used by the Swiss


That was a real stretch of the imagination: the Epervier didn't start life with an inline piston engine; wasn't used by the Swiss and wasn't a target tug.

Pilatus Porter fit the remit a bit better, even though it's not.

SWBKCB
10th May 2022, 15:12
That was a real stretch of the imagination: the Epervier didn't start life with an inline piston engine; wasn't used by the Swiss and wasn't a target tug.

Pilatus Porter fit the remit a bit better, even though it's not.

I'd never heard of it, so have learned something today! :ok:

papa_sierra
10th May 2022, 15:59
There is one at Wickenby. Photo is not mine but is copyrighted to Kevin Mape.
https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1095x730/wickenby_aircraft_97a6085775ce7de294f3432b224672a2984de5c5.j pg

old,not bold
10th May 2022, 18:14
Hmmm........you would want to be very careful when getting the tail up on take-off; the blades might have the tips cut off but they're still quite long.

treadigraph
10th May 2022, 18:34
Do I recall one taxying into the back of a parked JetRanger at Duxford? (Yes, I know a Spitfire did the same thing!)

Don't think I've ever actually seen one...

DHfan
11th May 2022, 00:06
Pilatus Porter fit the remit a bit better, even though it's not.

The Pilatus (Turbo)-Porter was my first guess, having completely forgotten about the Schlepp.

Pypard
11th May 2022, 02:07
It would also appear that all 24 aircraft (all converted from piston-engined C-3603's) survive. That must be some kind of record if correct.

DaveReidUK
11th May 2022, 06:35
It would also appear that all 24 aircraft (all converted from piston-engined C-3603's) survive. That must be some kind of record if correct.

The Swiss AF wrote one off in 1983 after it hit first a bird and then a power line.

treadigraph
11th May 2022, 07:05
Often see birds sitting on powerlines...

Jhieminga
11th May 2022, 08:21
There's a C-3604 that's back to airworthy status courtesy of a 500 series Merlin: https://www.scramble.nl/military-news/first-flight-of-rare-bird

Pypard
11th May 2022, 13:20
My recollection is that these were referred to as EKW C-3605; is "F+W" (F&W?) the same thing?

treadigraph
11th May 2022, 19:09
My recollection is that these were referred to as EKW C-3605; is "F+W" (F&W?) the same thing?
EKW built the original piston aircraft, the same company rebadged as F+W did the turbine conversions...

Noyade
12th May 2022, 01:26
Observer's '74...


https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1000x688/scan0970_ef1c82515231131173ae6bee49d3a6e2b93c49a4.jpg

Asturias56
12th May 2022, 07:40
Did they have a camera under the nose so the pilot could see what was ahead?

DuncanDoenitz
12th May 2022, 13:32
One wonders whether the designer had, erm, esteem issues in the trouser department.

Perhaps that's just me.