ayroplain
16th Jan 2021, 15:15
Comment posted on the Indonesian 735 crash thread:
over the years there have been many cases of pilots allowing the CVR to continue to record after landing - this overwrote all the information recorded during an "incident" on early small capacity recorders. This was especially the case for the CVR - even the FAA started to get suspicious.
Right on cue this report just issued by the AAIU is an example which is, presumably, one of the reasons the report is coming more than four years after the incident. Some very strange goings-on here!
Incident: Stobart AT72 at Dublin on Sep 2nd 2016, descended below assigned altitude and minimum safe altitude (http://avherald.com/h?article=49ea91f2&opt=0)
I've also just finished reading the full report at
http://www.aaiu.ie/sites/default/files/report-attachments/Report%202021-001_0.pdf
Very thorough report.
over the years there have been many cases of pilots allowing the CVR to continue to record after landing - this overwrote all the information recorded during an "incident" on early small capacity recorders. This was especially the case for the CVR - even the FAA started to get suspicious.
Right on cue this report just issued by the AAIU is an example which is, presumably, one of the reasons the report is coming more than four years after the incident. Some very strange goings-on here!
Incident: Stobart AT72 at Dublin on Sep 2nd 2016, descended below assigned altitude and minimum safe altitude (http://avherald.com/h?article=49ea91f2&opt=0)
I've also just finished reading the full report at
http://www.aaiu.ie/sites/default/files/report-attachments/Report%202021-001_0.pdf
Very thorough report.