PDA

View Full Version : A330 takes out Gulfstream at VLVT


Koan
11th Mar 2020, 20:52
A Thai Airways A330-300 has nearly ripped the tail off a Gulfstream IV private jet during a taxiing accident in Vientiane, Laos.The accident occurred in darkness on 9 March as the A330 (HS-TEU) prepared to operate flight TG575 on the Vientiane-Bangkok Suvarnabhumi route, according to Thai Airways.When the pilot took the plane out to the taxiway, its wing collided with the tail of a small personal plane. Images on social media show that the outboard leading edge of the A330s left wing suffered damage.As for the private jet, M-YWAY, the entire tail plane was nearly torn off, coming to rest on the right-side horizontal stabilizer. The front landing gear also appears to have been severely twisted in its mounting. The Thai aircraft was carrying 79 passengers and 13 crew, all of whom are safe, says the airline. Cirium fleets data indicates that HS-TEU is managed by Thai and was delivered in March 2010, though it only entered service in June 2011.
https://www.flightglobal.com/safety/thai-a330-shears-tail-off-gulfstream-iv-in-vientiane/137157.article

A Thai Airways A330-300 has nearly ripped the tail off a Gulfstream IV private jet during a taxiing accident in Vientiane, Laos.The accident occurred in darkness on 9 March as the A330 (HS-TEU) prepared to operate flight TG575 on the Vientiane-Bangkok Suvarnabhumi route, according to Thai Airways.When the pilot took the plane out to the taxiway, its wing collided with the tail of a small personal plane. Images on social media show that the outboard leading edge of the A330s left wing suffered damage.As for the private jet, M-YWAY, the entire tail plane was nearly torn off, coming to rest on the right-side horizontal stabilizer.








https://cimg3.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1199x551/essjtigxyaalyl8_jpg_430fd28a615078dd492c6db6d1d51d2f_a9487eb eb28345f571355bc39ba9c5206b1c1c02.jpg

You should see the other guy..
https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/780x358/imageproxy_php_b2fad024255c61bc55eff1f0b9846c1663713c26.jpeg

Longtimer
12th Mar 2020, 00:48
The most telling thing re this report is that the A330-300 was only carrying 79 passengers..... vs a full load over 400

Gauges and Dials
12th Mar 2020, 01:16
"Small personal plane". G4. :p

ATC Watcher
12th Mar 2020, 08:19
the 330 having apparently from the photo has relatively little visible damage , and aircraft was taxing out , so most probably at low speed, how can this cause the 90 deg cut off of a G4 vertical stab ? are the vertical stab so weak to lateral forces by design,?

marchino61
12th Mar 2020, 08:34
the 330 having apparently from the photo has relatively little visible damage , and aircraft was taxing out , so most probably at low speed, how can this cause the 90 deg cut off of a G4 vertical stab ? are the vertical stab so weak to lateral forces by design,?

Momentum.....

MechEngr
12th Mar 2020, 08:41
the 330 having apparently from the photo has relatively little visible damage , and aircraft was taxing out , so most probably at low speed, how can this cause the 90 deg cut off of a G4 vertical stab ? are the vertical stab so weak to lateral forces by design,?

The mention suggests that the nose gear on the G4 was damaged; It may be that more than a little leverage was involved.

It would not surprise me if the little jet was set onto one wingtip and the nose gear and lifted off the main gear during the event.

jmmoric
12th Mar 2020, 09:03
Momentum.....

Agreed, as with everything else when you work with things weithing over a 100 tonnes....

fox niner
12th Mar 2020, 09:35
Nice registration. M-YWAY.
perhaps the airbus was in a right turn, which would give the wingtip an extra kick?

golfyankeesierra
12th Mar 2020, 10:40
In more then one way a costly flight..
The Thai aircraft was carrying 79 passengers and 13 crew

Lord Bracken
12th Mar 2020, 11:01
Dearie me. The reason big widebodies are operated in Asia is not always due to expected pax loads...have you seen the state of some of the road haulage in that part of the world?

Wonderworld
12th Mar 2020, 12:13
The most telling thing re this report is that the A330-300 was only carrying 79 passengers..... vs a full load over 400

Since when do TG 333s take over 400 pax?

ZFT
12th Mar 2020, 12:15
Since when do TG 333s take over 400 pax?

Never..........

Longtimer
12th Mar 2020, 16:24
Since when do TG 333s take over 400 pax? the number posted was for an all economy 330 and of course was inaccurate for Thai. sorry but still not much of a load

No longer ATC
12th Mar 2020, 19:52
Nice registration. M-YWAY.
perhaps the airbus was in a right turn, which would give the wingtip an extra kick?
"Thai did it Myyyyy waaayyyyyy ................... I'll get me coat.

WingNut60
13th Mar 2020, 11:06
Dearie me. The reason big widebodies are operated in Asia is not always due to expected pax loads...have you seen the state of some of the road haulage in that part of the world?
I most certainly have.

For the most part Thailand is way ahead of its neighbours.

deja vu
14th Mar 2020, 02:22
the number posted was for an all economy 330 and of course was inaccurate for Thai. sorry but still not much of a load

You can only judge the load from the ZFW, which we don't know. My former company operated many 333 flights to one destination and return with <50 pax but at Max ZFW in that part of the world.

Air Inter ( now defunct) were the only A330 operator I know of with an all economy config of close to 400. Maybe others I guess.

No, what is telling is that this was not even close to missing the Gulfstream. We seem to be a bit short on info regarding who strayed where in this almost unforgivable event.

Pugilistic Animus
14th Mar 2020, 02:24
Reminds me of that AF A380 did the same thing to an ERJ

Pugilistic Animus
17th Mar 2020, 04:05
[QUOTE=deja vu;10713200]You can only judge the load from the ZFW, which we don't know. My former company operated many 333 flights to one destination and return with <50 pax but at Max ZFW in that part of the world.[/QUOTE/
​​​​​​What jet hits MZFW with just 50 punters?

deja vu
17th Mar 2020, 04:46
​​​​​​What jet hits MZFW with just 50 punters?[/QUOTE]

Early A330-300 for starters

megan
17th Mar 2020, 06:31
What jet hits MZFW with just 50 puntersIn conversation a non airline pilot commented on a 777 flight where they had similar number of pax and was told it was maxed out due to a belly load of fish. Possible?

Mad (Flt) Scientist
17th Mar 2020, 20:51
Reminds me of that AF A380 did the same thing to an ERJ

I believe it was an AF Regional ERJ and a Thai bully ....

Private jet
17th Mar 2020, 21:41
Looking at the image, parked a long way back?

DaveReidUK
17th Mar 2020, 22:04
I believe it was an AF Regional ERJ and a Thai bully ....

Air France A380 and Comair CRJ7 at JFK.

Pugilistic Animus
18th Mar 2020, 06:57
Mad( FLT) Scientist: the A380 is like a bull in a China shop however one slices it...JFK actually couldn't accept the A380 or 747-8 without several FAA waivers

Pugilistic Animus
18th Mar 2020, 23:16
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SpLd-t1tcJU

saffi
19th Mar 2020, 00:31
That must have hurt whomever was sitting in the "pointy end"......

Mad (Flt) Scientist
19th Mar 2020, 22:40
Actually, I usually think of that one when sat in the cabin and we stop short of the gate, and half the pax immediately get up to grab their carry-on etc.

I wonder how many were stood in the aisle when that collision happened ...

Longtimer
20th Mar 2020, 01:35
Actually, I usually think of that one when sat in the cabin and we stop short of the gate, and half the pax immediately get up to grab their carry-on etc.

I wonder how many were stood in the aisle when that collision happened ...
I bet they will not do so again. A lesson learned perhaps.

Pugilistic Animus
20th Mar 2020, 15:28
I haven't found an online epilogue to the JFK incident ... Very curious to know more details about it