PDA

View Full Version : Air System Nonsense


The B Word
15th Dec 2018, 08:25
I see that the MAA have recently redrafted the Military Rules of the Air using the nonsensical term “Air System” throughout rather than the far more sensible “Aircraft”.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/696309/RA2307_Issue_8.pdf

Looking at their own definition of “Air System’ in MAA 02 it hardly fits either:

Fixed or rotary wing Aircraft, piloted or remotely piloted, and the ground-based systems vital to their safe operation.

So their Rules of the Air now uses the term Air System and states that an “Air System should not be flown in such proximity to other Air Systems as to create a danger of collision”. How the hell does that fit if the ground-based systems are included?

What is wrong with the people in the MAA? Why do they have to make their documents so ridiculously complicated by using inappropriate words like “Air System” instead of the widely used “Aircraft”? If anyone from the MAA reads this can you please have a serious think about the readability of your document set. Here is a starter for ten from the Oxford Dictionary:

AIRCRAFT - An aeroplane, helicopter, or other machine capable of flight.

:ok:

Exrigger
15th Dec 2018, 08:40
Added to that, look at the cost to RAF Bases and civilian contractors under MRP-145 who now have to trawl through all their local documents/procedures/contracts and then amend them appropriately, that is not cheap in time and costs associated with that task.

VinRouge
15th Dec 2018, 09:02
I guess it's to ensure that safety standards, in my mind including technically and particularly maintainance that apply to the aircraft, also apply to the likes of ground control centres and launch/recovery systems.

Can't see an issue with it myself. Aviation is inherently technical. If it's too complicated, go drive a bus!

Lomon
15th Dec 2018, 09:46
They did it a few years ago. BM Orders (driven by the MAA changes) have referred to 'Air Systems' rather than 'Aircraft' for at least a year now, if not longer.

Compass Call
15th Dec 2018, 09:59
When I read the thread title, I thought that the poster was referring to Aircraft Air Systems, as opposed to Fuel, Hydraulic, Electrical system etc :-)

Il Duce
15th Dec 2018, 12:52
Do the Royal Navy operate "Water Systems" or "Aquatic Systems"?

Rigga
15th Dec 2018, 16:20
Added to that, look at the cost to RAF Bases and civilian contractors under MRP-145 who now have to trawl through all their local documents/procedures/contracts and then amend them appropriately, that is not cheap in time and costs associated with that task.

In the civvy world - you just add a declaration changing terms and definitions, you don't waste effort by chasing boll...politics at the top of the chain.

Chugalug2
15th Dec 2018, 17:29
Comedy isn't what it used to be. In the 60's heliopters became hicopleters...

ACW342
16th Dec 2018, 14:14
I guess it's to ensure that safety standards, in my mind including technically and particularly maintainance that apply to the aircraft, also apply to the likes of ground control centres and launch/recovery systems.

Can't see an issue with it myself. Aviation is inherently technical. If it's too complicated, go drive a bus!

So does this mean that “ground Control Centres should not be flown in such proximity to other Ground Control Centres as to create a danger of collision”. I do believe that sometimes people make things sound more "Technical" than need be. In this case I think I detect the scent of "Male Bovine Faces"

tucumseh
16th Dec 2018, 15:02
Does MoD still have that department near Swindon that provides definitions/translations of words and phrases used by MoD that don't appear in any dictionary? I'd never heard of them until just before retiring, when I overheard one of my young graduates talking to them on the phone. He'd a degree in English Lit and done the Shrivenham Defence Admin degree course (bloody waste of time that one), but couldn't make head nor tail of a URD he'd received from London.

SASless
16th Dec 2018, 15:34
I do believe that sometimes people make things sound more "Technical" than need be.

Is that not a basic inherited trait of the British?:E

Rosevidney1
16th Dec 2018, 19:14
And our American friends are no slouches in that department either. How about Air Movement Device for 'fan'? :-)

Compass Call
16th Dec 2018, 19:26
What about "Dustman" - ' Council Domestic Waste Removal and Relocation Technician/Operative' ;)'

GlassCollector
16th Dec 2018, 21:23
Also, when did a 'room' become a 'space'?

unmanned_droid
17th Dec 2018, 00:03
This is most probably inspired by RPAS where the platform/vehicle is one part of a system spread far and wide.

NutLoose
17th Dec 2018, 00:28
What a load of Human future genetic material containment and production spheres..or bolloxs, why do these tossers or excess time expired genetic material disposal systems think it is smart to "redefine" words, does it give them a some sense of superiority or simply make up for deficiency in their petty lives?

NutLoose
17th Dec 2018, 00:32
Also, when did a 'room' become a 'space'?

About the same time as one stopped selling a house and replaced it with property.

Ascend Charlie
17th Dec 2018, 00:51
In the 60's heliopters became hicopleters...

Around here, they are Uptycopters.

treadigraph
17th Dec 2018, 08:31
I once travelled on a London bus displaying a notice describing the driver as the "personal transportation facilitator"...

1.3VStall
17th Dec 2018, 08:45
And don't forget that when Neil Armstrong walked on the moon he was wearing a nappy "fecal retention subsystem" under his space suit!

Bing
17th Dec 2018, 11:19
So does this mean that “ground Control Centres should not be flown in such proximity to other Ground Control Centres as to create a danger of collision”. I do believe that sometimes people make things sound more "Technical" than need be. In this case I think I detect the scent of "Male Bovine Faces"

Exactly, it's not the Air System that's flying, it's the Aircraft part of the Air System be that manned or otherwise.

PlasticCabDriver
17th Dec 2018, 16:12
Around here, they are Uptycopters.

Nonsense. Any fule knows they are called Jellyfloppers.

NutLoose
18th Dec 2018, 11:17
"Morning Chief, how many Air systems can we generate today?"
"Errr... three desk fans, one air conditioning unit, one fan oven, one hot airgun, two air start trollies and ermm... ahhh yes four aircraft"

;)

SASless
18th Dec 2018, 12:32
Well for sure "Choppers" is out as that is so Sexist.

A and C
19th Dec 2018, 08:18
My guess is that these people are so detached from reality that writing this sort of nonsense allows them to avoid any chance of contact with an aircraft ( sorry air system ) and therefore avoiding making any decisions that might be difficult to or involve and risk to their careers.

The question I would like to ask of my MP is why with so many failings of the military airworthiness system are we employing muppets to write this stuff rather than fix the airworthiness system ?

unmanned_droid
19th Dec 2018, 10:39
It's easier to produce documents about fully airworthy air systems than it is to produce fully airworthy air systems.

EAP86
19th Dec 2018, 11:07
I think that if a comparison is made between the number of traditional aircraft types and the number of RPAS/UAVS/Drones in design, build or Service, it will become apparent that there are many more of the latter which explains why "Air System" was chosen. A few years ago, the Army in particular had large numbers of unmanned projects on the go and their compliance with regs wasn't the best. One unmanned program was described to me as like "procuring a Land Rover with wings".

EAP

Basil
19th Dec 2018, 13:31
Nevertheless, a UAV is an aircraft.

19th Dec 2018, 15:22
We first saw this bollox in the early 2000s with the first UKSAR bid - some genius from the school of blue-sky thinking decided that a replacement for Mil SAR helicopters didn't have to be different SAR helicopters - it could be a balloon or dirigible so the term Air System was used. WAFLOB.......ask an SH crewman if you can't work it out:)

Bazzo
19th Dec 2018, 16:32
In the A400 world we went from SRM to ASR, according to the Airbus web site they're not too sure if it means Air vehicle or Aircraft Structural Repair Manual

Compass Call
20th Dec 2018, 14:15
Todays Telegraph - 'Civil Enforcement Officer = Traffic Warden' :confused:

langleybaston
20th Dec 2018, 15:16
There were Air Systems at quite a few RAF Control Towers, especially where Met. lived down stairs ............... obs, specials and twarnings were shot upwards by Lamson tubes.
The occasional liaison with a WAAF was also arranged thereby.

The tubes could transport a modest quantity of jelly beans or alternatives to taste.

SASless
20th Dec 2018, 16:19
Crab,

The US Coast Guard sent pilots and other ranks to Lakehurst, New Jersey for Blimp Training in 1945....so yes...SAR can be done by other than a helicopter.

During WWII....the US Navy used Blimps for SAR and other duties.....the K Model had a 59 hour Fuel Endurance and carried Radar.


https://books.google.com/books?id=q98DAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA65&lpg=PA65&dq=Navy+Blimp+rescuing+people+at+sea&source=bl&ots=162e32jy-w&sig=g-a7v7bTyDsUuuS9gj1TpAju0Q4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi5l-il967fAhVCWqwKHYtsBLMQ6AEwFHoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=Navy%20Blimp%20rescuing%20people%20at%20sea&f=false

JRFD
20th Dec 2018, 17:29
This nonsense started i the 70's when I was at Border Radar. We couldn't declare the radar 'Un-serviceable', it had to "Essential Facility Lost".

I always wondered where it had got to!

NutLoose
20th Dec 2018, 17:53
You should have sent it to us JRFD, we had a magic cupboard that our Chief used to shove broken ground equipment stuff in, then pulled it out months later when we were desperate and would say try that, and blow me it worked..... for about 5 mins.

whowhenwhy
20th Dec 2018, 18:14
What's particularly irritating about this is that if the MAA had referred to ICAO materials (Annex 2 I believe) they'd have discovered that unmanned aircraft (there's a clue in there) are classed as aircraft...:ugh:

Il Duce
21st Dec 2018, 15:15
Even the Verey pistols used by ATC are now referred to as Weapon Systems.
"Weapon fires, weapon stops!" Imagine that.

flensr
22nd Dec 2018, 02:31
Ok, we've agreed that it's a bad idea to drive your GCS through controlled airspace, but where on the ramp can we park it?

Party Animal
22nd Dec 2018, 15:32
"Even the Verey pistols used by ATC are now referred to as Weapon Systems"

As are the miniflares that I carry in my LSJ. Which also includes the delight of a weapon handling test every 6 months for currency. Lapse on this BCR and I will automatically be grounded until I re-pass the test!

Oh, and while I'm here, we had a period a few years ago when the fleet was temporarily grounded - except it was called an 'Operational Pause' because mid level leadership were frightened to be associated with failure to generate aircraft.

mikemmb
22nd Dec 2018, 16:14
Do the Royal Navy operate "Water Systems" or "Aquatic Systems"?

Don't forget the Army’s “Terestial Mobility Systems”!

Compass Call
22nd Dec 2018, 20:30
Latest from the Telegraph: "Care Navigators = Receptionists" :confused:

cynicalint
22nd Dec 2018, 23:37
"Transparent Wall Cleansing System" A bucket of water and a chamois leather cloth to clean a window.