PDA

View Full Version : Lido vs Jepp EHAM night RNAV

reverserunlocked
28th Oct 2018, 19:30
Anyone know what the story is with the Jepp vs Lido night RNAV into EHAM? Lido clearly gives the altitudes at EH600, NARIX and EH604 as 'AT OR ABOVE', whereas the Jepps give them as (according the 'how to interpret Jeppps pages' recommended altitudes.
What is a recommended altitude? Is it an at or above? I'm a bit confused at to why they've labelled it this way.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1605x1059/lido_273c2bbae9284513e3ea57142419e5779ec9be99.png

LIDO
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune.org-vbulletin/1246x821/jepp_4bd9fefe89a13ebf4c7f4619c51697ea1491e5f7.png
Jepp
FlightDetent
28th Oct 2018, 19:43
Hi reverse. Are you looking for this perhaps? http://www.ais-netherlands.nl/aim/2018-08-30-AIRAC/graphics/eAIP/EH-AD-2.EHAM-TRAN-18R.pdf

Sorry I cannot answer your question (why).
reverserunlocked
28th Oct 2018, 21:02
Hi reverse. Are you looking for this perhaps? http://www.ais-netherlands.nl/aim/2018-08-30-AIRAC/graphics/eAIP/EH-AD-2.EHAM-TRAN-18R.pdf

Sorry I cannot answer your question (why).

Yep well that seems to clear up that for sure it's an 'at or above' - just wondered why the Jepps show it differently. Cheers!
aterpster
29th Oct 2018, 15:27
Yep well that seems to clear up that for sure it's an 'at or above' - just wondered why the Jepps show it differently. Cheers!

The Jepp nav database shows them as at-or-above."