J.L.Seagull
9th Apr 2017, 06:00
I can almost predict the backlash here... i.e. what is the pilot for? what about airmanship? etc etc... but just hear me out and let me know if this idea makes sense.
Wake turbulence for all aircraft types has definitely been considered during the design stage as part of the CFD models. So, we know what the wake is supposed to look like (intensity, direction, etc.)
We already have TCAS RAs, computed based on predicted TAUs. As part of the TCAS data broadcasted, why not have the aircraft gross weight and wind data also broadcast.
The receiving aircraft has it's own wind data and knows it's own gross weight and flight characteristics). Based on the info received, a lateral offset can easily be computed and suggested to the crew.
The deviation suggestion can (just like TCAS) be in the form of just information, or a resolution order, allowing the crew to decide what course of action to take.
New rules and SOPs may be needed to include wake avoidance in busy TMA's and narrow RNP airways.
What say?
Wake turbulence for all aircraft types has definitely been considered during the design stage as part of the CFD models. So, we know what the wake is supposed to look like (intensity, direction, etc.)
We already have TCAS RAs, computed based on predicted TAUs. As part of the TCAS data broadcasted, why not have the aircraft gross weight and wind data also broadcast.
The receiving aircraft has it's own wind data and knows it's own gross weight and flight characteristics). Based on the info received, a lateral offset can easily be computed and suggested to the crew.
The deviation suggestion can (just like TCAS) be in the form of just information, or a resolution order, allowing the crew to decide what course of action to take.
New rules and SOPs may be needed to include wake avoidance in busy TMA's and narrow RNP airways.
What say?