Ebbie 2003
19th Jan 2017, 16:23
For the past few years as an "older" FAA PPL I have been following with great interest the developments in connection with PPL's and Class 3 medicals.
I even went to the trouble of contacting AOPA and spoke with some of their guys - specifically asking how it would impact those of use whose primary license is FAA. I was told "don't worry we have it covered. They just didn't seem that interested. Then it passes and the FAA issue their rules.
The problem is that the standard is not to be able to meet the medical requirement to hold a US drivers license - but actually to have one. So I thought OK go do a driving test and get one.
Now the big problem - you can only get a US drivers license if you are a US citizen or a US permanent resident.
So those of US who are not do not get the benefit of these great liberalisation of the medical rules.
I live in Barbados and fly throughout the Eastern Caribbean primarily - the informal advice I had from our local CAA was - if the US licence is good and you meet their requirements (no matter what they are) we would be happy.
So a bit of a let down; in the UK there are to be similar rules (indeed I believe there are already for some activities) anyone else have thoughts on the issue.
Got to feel sorry for those in the US who fly but don't drive - or maybe there isn't such a beastie:)
It may seem like a whinge - but the whole point was the pointlessness of the medical for PPL's and the cost - well when one has to fly thousands of miles to get to an FME and get every test under the sun just to be sure the medical from someone from a remote location is measured in multiple thousands of dollars:(
The reforms are good though - but for the want of a few words in the rules (meeting the standard for rather than having a drivers licence) it cold have included a lot more people.
I even went to the trouble of contacting AOPA and spoke with some of their guys - specifically asking how it would impact those of use whose primary license is FAA. I was told "don't worry we have it covered. They just didn't seem that interested. Then it passes and the FAA issue their rules.
The problem is that the standard is not to be able to meet the medical requirement to hold a US drivers license - but actually to have one. So I thought OK go do a driving test and get one.
Now the big problem - you can only get a US drivers license if you are a US citizen or a US permanent resident.
So those of US who are not do not get the benefit of these great liberalisation of the medical rules.
I live in Barbados and fly throughout the Eastern Caribbean primarily - the informal advice I had from our local CAA was - if the US licence is good and you meet their requirements (no matter what they are) we would be happy.
So a bit of a let down; in the UK there are to be similar rules (indeed I believe there are already for some activities) anyone else have thoughts on the issue.
Got to feel sorry for those in the US who fly but don't drive - or maybe there isn't such a beastie:)
It may seem like a whinge - but the whole point was the pointlessness of the medical for PPL's and the cost - well when one has to fly thousands of miles to get to an FME and get every test under the sun just to be sure the medical from someone from a remote location is measured in multiple thousands of dollars:(
The reforms are good though - but for the want of a few words in the rules (meeting the standard for rather than having a drivers licence) it cold have included a lot more people.